|
Post by celticjobber on Sept 10, 2014 20:03:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Sept 10, 2014 20:05:44 GMT -5
Quoting this so it doesnt' get lost at the bottom of a page.
|
|
|
Post by Dean F'n Ambrose on Sept 10, 2014 20:13:30 GMT -5
Not sure if this goes into the Divas or the Superstars one, but this is hilarious. Poor Charlotte.
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,996
|
Post by Sparkybob on Sept 10, 2014 20:35:26 GMT -5
Quoting this so it doesnt' get lost at the bottom of a page. So I can still post my Randy Orton thigh's gif right? For the sake of the board the answer better be yes.
|
|
|
Post by PsychoGoatee on Sept 10, 2014 20:54:55 GMT -5
People find eachother attractive, posting material either officially from a show they're on or pics they themselves post should all be considered okay I'd say. Just one opinion, but just for the record, I really disagree with this. It's okay to like what a person looks like, if this topic is dedicated just to "ring action", well, that would be very strong censorship that serves no real purpose, other than forcing your view against PG sexuality on your forum users. I know that's your call to make, just sharing my two cents. I'd hope gifs from RAW or clothed pics from a diva wouldn't be discouraged because their body is noticeable in the picture. Appreciating the human body and attraction to other people is oddly enough more natural than power fantasy fictional violence. I'm not going to break your rules, and I hope you're okay with different views and opinions being voiced on your forum. It's good that selfie pics and professional pics are allowed, but gifs or pics highlighting what they look like on live TV being discouraged to me is misguided and pretty bad censorship. If that moment of somebody bending over getting in the ring is okay for TVPG, I think it should be okay for the posters on here. But hey. (I should also add, I like the Garth Marenghi's Dark Place avatar Kash has, and Garth Mereghi would be appalled at this censorship if he existed.) And if "showing off breasts" isn't okay, what is? The woman are not wearing much, any view where the camera is at all zoomed in chest up the breasts will be noticed. This is okay! It's not bad! To me it's offensive that showing cleavage or pics highlighting it would be banned. Plus there are women who want to "free the nipple" and have the right to be topless in public, the same rights men have. Not even saying to allow topless pics on here, just pointing out that's a view that plenty of women do have. What is more harmless than breasts, or in the case of this topic the top half of breasts. What is the root of the problem, why make something that is good supposedly bad? Who does it benefit?
|
|
jemtruman
ALF
Chances are, I stole it from the tumbles.
Posts: 1,238
|
Post by jemtruman on Sept 10, 2014 21:12:59 GMT -5
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,996
|
Post by Sparkybob on Sept 10, 2014 21:23:20 GMT -5
Honestly if those are the new rules, I'm not sure what's the purpose of having the divas and superstar gif threads be separate.
|
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Sept 10, 2014 21:26:28 GMT -5
Honestly if those are the new rules, I'm not sure what's the purpose of having the divas and superstar gif threads be separate. Dude, these threads are loaded up with clean content. I mean abso-f***ing-lutely loaded down. This site has a wide variety of visitors, we're in mixed company you'd say and for a lot of that company that's interested in the clean content it's either entirely inappropriate or completely uncomfortable to sift through the minority of hyper sexualized content.
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Sept 10, 2014 21:28:50 GMT -5
Honestly if those are the new rules, I'm not sure what's the purpose of having the divas and superstar gif threads be separate. Nah, I wouldn't go that far. If they aren't separated, they'll just over-run the other thread. I support this change 100%. And to bring this thread back on-topic
|
|
|
Post by Error on Sept 10, 2014 21:29:58 GMT -5
First, knock that shit off with shots at each other.
Second, in what way is telling you to not make gifs out of a 1 second shot of a female's crotch, butt or breasts or take zoomed in screenshots of the same killing anyone? When you want to perv on people that bad, do it elsewhere because we're sick of it. It is that simple. We're not saying that if they come out in bikinis or bra and panties that you cannot post that, just that the shit where people going frame by frame to get a shot of a part of a female body ends as far as this place is concerned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2014 21:30:09 GMT -5
Yes, acceptance, equality, tolerance, and a lack of shaming is indeed a "cool story", bro, I suppose. Yeah, that's cool. Carrying the flag in the name of pictures that consist of extreme close ups of labias and anuses? That shit is creepy and needs to be kept in private message meetings and spank bank websites. I think now that we have private message conversations that people can participate in, this content being prevented isn't a bad thing in the least. Maybe give the people who want to participate in that some kind of way to round up names of interested people so they can message each other that stuff in private, just to facilitate an easy shift away from this thread.
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 10,996
|
Post by Sparkybob on Sept 10, 2014 21:33:29 GMT -5
Honestly if those are the new rules, I'm not sure what's the purpose of having the divas and superstar gif threads be separate. Dude, these threads are loaded up with clean content. I mean abso-f***ing-lutely loaded down. This site has a wide variety of visitors, we're in mixed company you'd say and for a lot of that company that's interested in the clean content it's either entirely inappropriate or completely uncomfortable to sift through the minority of hyper sexualized content. But with those new rules, those dirty comments won't be allowed anyways. And those rules basically defeat the original purpose of the split which I heard was due to people complaining of all the dirty images of Divas clogging up the thread. I mean to me, if you are comfortable seeing a gif of Cesaro neutralizing Sheamus, I don't see how Paige hitting the Page turner will force that same person to become uncomfortable. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
Post by PsychoGoatee on Sept 10, 2014 21:35:53 GMT -5
First, knock that shit off with shots at each other. Second, in what way is telling you to not make gifs out of a 1 second shot of a female's crotch, butt or breasts or take zoomed in screenshots of the same killing anyone? When you want to perv on people that bad, do it elsewhere because we're sick of it. It is that simple. We're not saying that if they come out in bikinis or bra and panties that you cannot post that, just that the shit where people going frame by frame to get a shot of a part of a female body ends as far as this place is concerned. I haven't seen many gifs in here lately where it's zoomed in specifically on anything, it's usually just whatever the camera was doing on RAW, recorded onto a gif. To me if a camera shot of a TVPG show hightlights somebody's butt while they bend over, that should be able to be posted. Ditto for breasts. Is this rule just against cropped zoomed faceless pics of breasts and butts? The rules say "showing off breasts" is off limits, which would kill the thread yes.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,391
|
Post by Mozenrath on Sept 10, 2014 21:37:42 GMT -5
There's a difference between studio shots, in ring action gifs, all that, and just zooming right in. Beyond that, they will remain separate just because otherwise, the sheer volume would have us blowing through threads much too rapidly, which played a part in their separation at the genesis.
Some gifs that have been posted before, I feel like after seeing them, I should be forwarded to their OB/GYN. It's a bit much, and it's been causing issues. Similarly, there's a difference between something like "Eden Rhodes is seriously gorgeous" or the like, and the recently deleted "Nice dumper!"
We are asking people to show judgment in what they post, and if that seems draconic, I'm sorry to hear that, but it isn't negotiable. We do not arbitrarily decide to do things like this, it is due to evaluating the community and our options, and besides that, there is no shortage of sites where people could find more lax content rules, and people are free to go there for skeezier shots. Power to them to do so. It's just not going to fly here.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Sept 10, 2014 21:39:30 GMT -5
Seriously, like 90% of the stuff that was posted before can still be posted.
Selfies, posed shots, actual wrestling moves, pictures of them with their fans, pictures from shows... etc. etc.
|
|
|
Post by PsychoGoatee on Sept 10, 2014 21:41:16 GMT -5
Some gifs that have been posted before, I feel like after seeing them, I should be forwarded to their OB/GYN. That's one thing, but what about clothed breasts? What exactly is filthy and terrible about that? Seriously, like 90% of the stuff that was posted before can still be posted. Selfies, posed shots, actual wrestling moves, pictures of them with their fans, pictures from shows... etc. etc. The majority of the best content in the topic is gifs and pics from RAW that aren't wrestling moves. Why limit it to wrestling moves? The sexy posing and entrances and whatnot are intentional, and are considered TVPG by the way. It's harmless stuff. Would the gif of Brock laughing from Summerslam be banned? Not a wrestling move. Why do women have to be wrestling to be in a gif now? I genuinely don't understand why this could be considered a positive idea.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Sept 10, 2014 21:50:19 GMT -5
Nowhere did I say they had to be pictures of wrestling moves only, and I listed poses as one of the acceptable things in my incomplete list of stuff that's still ok.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2014 21:52:22 GMT -5
There's a difference between studio shots, in ring action gifs, all that, and just zooming right in. Beyond that, they will remain separate just because otherwise, the sheer volume would have us blowing through threads much too rapidly, which played a part in their separation at the genesis. Some gifs that have been posted before, I feel like after seeing them, I should be forwarded to their OB/GYN. It's a bit much, and it's been causing issues. Similarly, there's a difference between something like "Eden Rhodes is seriously gorgeous" or the like, and the recently deleted "Nice dumper!" We are asking people to show judgment in what they post, and if that seems draconic, I'm sorry to hear that, but it isn't negotiable. We do not arbitrarily decide to do things like this, it is due to evaluating the community and our options, and besides that, there is no shortage of sites where people could find more lax content rules, and people are free to go there for skeezier shots. Power to them to do so. It's just not going to fly here. This is purely out of curiosity: how would you rule on...say, the "Paige on the ring apron" .gif on Page 39? Frame-by-frame, it's clearly a zoom in or cut section of the overall camera, since Bella interference (the storyline there) is only barely in the image. Such an action would, from what I can tell, really be teetering on the edge of what is and isn't acceptable. Now, here's the thing. Paige is arching her back out, sticking her butt up. That being the focus of the image does seem kind of sleazy, but she's almost certainly doing it on purpose. People don't move in that way unless they're doing it with some purpose. It's not like she's got someone in the PTO and the camera is fishing for a nip slip or something. So what would you make of that one? Would images of that nature (overly zooming on something that is intentionally risqué) be allowed or barred from future posting? {Spoiler}{Spoiler}...gosh, I feel like Hank Hill in the episode about the porn rental.
|
|
|
Post by PsychoGoatee on Sept 10, 2014 21:54:06 GMT -5
Nowhere did I say they had to be pictures of wrestling moves only, and I listed poses as one of the acceptable things in my incomplete list of stuff that's still ok. Since you said actual wrestling moves, it sounded like other stuff in the ring wasn't encouraged. Or to make it easier, could you specificy what isn't allowed? Other than manually zooming in or cropping an image, can anything a woman does on WWE TV be shown in a gif in this topic? If not, why not? And why do men and women have seperate rules on this subject? Why can we see Randy Orton in more poses and angles than divas now apparently? The rules as worded say that anything showing off breasts is off limits in a gif, but what doesn't show off the breasts in ring attire? If the camera is zooming in on somebody putting a headlock on somebody, we happen to see noticeable cleavage, is this still okay? If not, you can't really say 90% of the topic still flies.
|
|
|
Post by Savage Gambino on Sept 10, 2014 21:55:10 GMT -5
There's a difference between studio shots, in ring action gifs, all that, and just zooming right in. Beyond that, they will remain separate just because otherwise, the sheer volume would have us blowing through threads much too rapidly, which played a part in their separation at the genesis. Some gifs that have been posted before, I feel like after seeing them, I should be forwarded to their OB/GYN. It's a bit much, and it's been causing issues. Similarly, there's a difference between something like "Eden Rhodes is seriously gorgeous" or the like, and the recently deleted "Nice dumper!" We are asking people to show judgment in what they post, and if that seems draconic, I'm sorry to hear that, but it isn't negotiable. We do not arbitrarily decide to do things like this, it is due to evaluating the community and our options, and besides that, there is no shortage of sites where people could find more lax content rules, and people are free to go there for skeezier shots. Power to them to do so. It's just not going to fly here. That sounds more than fair. Hell, 90-95% of the Divas threads are relatively harmless anyway. If you're so hung up on the other five percent, well, I don't know what to tell you. Quite frankly, I can do without all the allusions to beating off.
|
|