|
|
Post by Digital Witness on Dec 27, 2014 11:52:37 GMT -5
Let's see... 1. It was good, not that good. 2. Not seen it. 3. Should be the top one. 4. Not seen it. 5. Payback one was way better. 6. Not seen it. 7. Yeah, that was great. 8. Ditto. 9. It was okay. 10. Yeah, good match, though found it kind of hard to care about it that much with how much they've faced each other. 11. Not seen it. 12. Don't know that I'd put it that high but was great. 13. Didn't like it. 14. Wouldn't put it that high but a lot of fun. Extreme Rules was better. 15. Great match, terrible ending kind of ruins it. 16. Not seen it. 17. Great match and yet a third of the people involved in it were fired. 18. Not seen it. 19. Yeah, that ruled. 20. Fun, not that fun. 21. I'll allow it, that was nuts. 22. Great match I completely forgot about. 23. Not seen it. 24. Noooo. 25. That match f***ing sucked. In my opinion, everyone needs to go out of their way to see #2 and #4. |
|
Bo Rida
Fry's dog Seymour
Pulled one over on everyone.
Got away with it, this time.
Posts: 23,480
Member is Online
|
Post by Bo Rida on Dec 27, 2014 12:23:09 GMT -5
Hmm, of course I'd swap some things around but that's a surprisingly good list.
However doesn't it contradict that top 100 matches to watch on the network list they did recently?
(Maybe not as I haven't checked)
|
|
|
|
Post by Capt. Internet Darling on Dec 27, 2014 13:23:50 GMT -5
This list makes me wish the WWE would actually give some goddamn respect to Cesaro. He might be a little bit Swiss but the guy is supremely talented and this list is the best evidence of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth Drakin of Monster Crap on Dec 27, 2014 14:11:52 GMT -5
Wow....WWE staff believing the Survivor Series Match is better than Zayn vs. Neville despite what every other person would tell you. I guess you gotta make that Slammy mean something even though it was done before the Zayn vs. Neville match was done.
|
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Dec 27, 2014 15:11:59 GMT -5
Until I see the NXT stuff, my top five for this year is
1. Bryan/HHH
2. Shield/Wyatts
3. Orton/Batista/Bryan
4. Team Cena/Team Authority
5. Usos/Wyatts
|
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Dec 27, 2014 16:59:51 GMT -5
Times like this make it painfully obvious that WWE.com is basically non-canon.
|
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Dec 27, 2014 18:43:11 GMT -5
Times like this make it painfully obvious that WWE.com is basically non-canon. This is the website that said Ziggler/Bryan from Bragging Rights 2010 was MOTY when the Slammy went to Michaels/Undertaker (not unjustifiably, but the fact it got its due was crazy). |
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Dec 27, 2014 18:45:28 GMT -5
Times like this make it painfully obvious that WWE.com is basically non-canon. This is the website that said Ziggler/Bryan from Bragging Rights 2010 was MOTY when the Slammy went to Michaels/Undertaker (not unjustifiably, but the fact it got its due was crazy). I wasn't saying it as a criticism, just making an observation. WWE.com acknowledges ROH and even TNA in passing once off the top of my head. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2014 18:51:19 GMT -5
Bryan v Wyatt at the Rumble is my personal favourite singles match from this year. I am sure people will argue NXT stuff but it felt like everyone was going "this is a waste of Bryan" and going on about how Wyatt was crap yet they stole the show. That puts it over the others for me in that you were legit surprised while the others almost had an expectation of the quality.
I am just glad WWE even acknowledge the quality of the match nearly a year on instead of just the result.
|
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Dec 27, 2014 19:11:42 GMT -5
This is the website that said Ziggler/Bryan from Bragging Rights 2010 was MOTY when the Slammy went to Michaels/Undertaker (not unjustifiably, but the fact it got its due was crazy). I wasn't saying it as a criticism, just making an observation. WWE.com acknowledges ROH and even TNA in passing once off the top of my head. No, I completely get you, just saying this is a weirdly consistent thing they do, along with the ROH and TNA stuff. Joey seems to get (mostly) free run of the place. |
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Dec 27, 2014 19:13:06 GMT -5
I wasn't saying it as a criticism, just making an observation. WWE.com acknowledges ROH and even TNA in passing once off the top of my head. No, I completely get you, just saying this is a weirdly consistent thing they do, along with the ROH and TNA stuff. Joey seems to get (mostly) free run of the place. Sort of the best and worst of WWE rolled into one really, isn't it? WWE.com is f***ing awesome, but only because absolutely no-one important is paying attention to it. |
|
