Dolph Ziggler for Royal Rumble winner!!!

[Instant Classic]

I find it amazing that Ziggler has been in the WWE since like 2006 and I've never been a fan of the guy. I've never disliked him, but I was never a fan. Since around Septemeber he's has consistently impressed me as the days keep coming. If anyone deserves this Mania main event, it's Ziggler. Not Reigns, not Ambrose(2nd choice), and not even Daniel Bryan. Go Zig!!!!

[Pushed to the Moon]

It won't happen BUT if pigs start flying and he does win it I'd like to see him enter at either 1 or 2.

[Deleted]

I don't see it happening.


Unless they do the double winner finish then do a Triple Threat at mania, but it would have to be under elimination rules so whoever would win would get the rub of pinning Lesnar and another guy in the same match. Ideally Reigns tries spearing Ziggler who sidesteps a spear and pushes Reigns and his spear in to Lesnar who is behind him and just standing up followed by lesnar being eliminated by pin then Ziggler beating Reigns after a solid match minus Lesnar by out thinking him.


Of course Ziggler should lose the title within a month (ideally the next night on Raw) to Rollins or Wyatt (or even better Reigns who turns heel to win the belt) for some heats and to set up the next storyline which is Ziggler chasing the title until Summerslam, Bryan returns somewhere in there and gets an automatic shot as a make good for being stripped of the title which adds a triple threat match to whoever Ziggler and the champion are as a way to extend the storyline a month longer and let Bryan work with the 2 young guys to give them the rub and give them experience of working with a veteran.

[xCompackx]

I could be wrong, but I think Dolph's chances would be a lot higher if Brock Lesnar wasn't Champion. I know that Cena vs. Lesnar 3(4) is at Royal Rumble, but there's no way they'd have Brock away from TV for so long just to lose 2 months before WrestleMania and Ziggler vs. Lesnar just isn't something Vince won't see any money in. I'd love to see Dolph Ziggler win the Royal Rumble, but I doubt it.

[Deleted]

Dec 28, 2014 19:36:11 GMT -5 @graant said:

I don't see it happening.


Unless they do the double winner finish then do a Triple Threat at mania, but it would have to be under elimination rules so whoever would win would get the rub of pinning Lesnar and another guy in the same match. Ideally Reigns tries spearing Ziggler who sidesteps a spear and pushes Reigns and his spear in to Lesnar who is behind him and just standing up followed by lesnar being eliminated by pin then Ziggler beating Reigns after a solid match minus Lesnar by out thinking him.


Of course Ziggler should lose the title within a month (ideally the next night on Raw) to Rollins or Wyatt (or even better Reigns who turns heel to win the belt) for some heats and to set up the next storyline which is Ziggler chasing the title until Summerslam, Bryan returns somewhere in there and gets an automatic shot as a make good for being stripped of the title which adds a triple threat match to whoever Ziggler and the champion are as a way to extend the storyline a month longer and let Bryan work with the 2 young guys to give them the rub and give them experience of working with a veteran.

Ziggler is older than Bryan, but you probably mean career wise.

[metylerca]

Dec 29, 2014 11:55:25 GMT -5 @rainbowrandy said:

Dec 28, 2014 19:36:11 GMT -5 @graant said:

I don't see it happening.


Unless they do the double winner finish then do a Triple Threat at mania, but it would have to be under elimination rules so whoever would win would get the rub of pinning Lesnar and another guy in the same match. Ideally Reigns tries spearing Ziggler who sidesteps a spear and pushes Reigns and his spear in to Lesnar who is behind him and just standing up followed by lesnar being eliminated by pin then Ziggler beating Reigns after a solid match minus Lesnar by out thinking him.


Of course Ziggler should lose the title within a month (ideally the next night on Raw) to Rollins or Wyatt (or even better Reigns who turns heel to win the belt) for some heats and to set up the next storyline which is Ziggler chasing the title until Summerslam, Bryan returns somewhere in there and gets an automatic shot as a make good for being stripped of the title which adds a triple threat match to whoever Ziggler and the champion are as a way to extend the storyline a month longer and let Bryan work with the 2 young guys to give them the rub and give them experience of working with a veteran.

Ziggler is older than Bryan, but you probably mean career wise.

Do we really want old man Ziggler with his finger on the button?

[Instant Classic]

I mean, why else have him be the sole survivor and give that talk about how he's gonna be the man with Michael Cole?

[deancubed]

Dec 29, 2014 16:23:13 GMT -5 Instant Classic said:

I mean, why else have him be the sole survivor and give that talk about how he's gonna be the man with Michael Cole?

To set up more main event stars for when Lesnar is gone and Cena is busy outside of the title picture.

[gnr123]

Dec 29, 2014 16:23:13 GMT -5 Instant Classic said:

I mean, why else have him be the sole survivor and give that talk about how he's gonna be the man with Michael Cole?

Why give Cearo his huge win at WM, but no follow-up? Why did they have Daniel Bryan turn on the Wyatt's and get one of the biggest crowd reaction in year, yet not win the Rumble? The do this stuff all the time with little or no reason's. Just like Batista last year, I think their dead-set of Reigns winning and nothing going to change that. It would be awesome if Ziggler, Ambrose, or even a returning Bryan won. but, Reigns will probably win to the displeasure of many of us.

[Instant Classic]

Dec 29, 2014 17:00:18 GMT -5 gnr123 said:

Dec 29, 2014 16:23:13 GMT -5 Instant Classic said:

I mean, why else have him be the sole survivor and give that talk about how he's gonna be the man with Michael Cole?

Why give Cearo his huge win at WM, but no follow-up? Why did they have Daniel Bryan turn on the Wyatt's and get one of the biggest crowd reaction in year, yet not win the Rumble? The do this stuff all the time with little or no reason's. Just like Batista last year, I think their dead-set of Reigns winning and nothing going to change that. It would be awesome if Ziggler, Ambrose, or even a returning Bryan won. but, Reigns will probably win to the displeasure of many of us.

Well, I'll like Roman winning, but only really because hopefully we get a Rollins cash in. I like Reigns, but he's not ready. 

[Bub (BLM)]

Honestly, I'd put him in at number 1 and have him win the thing. He's over enough to justify it, and no one on the main roster sells an underdog story during a match better than Ziggler. That place would erupt when he won.

[kingbookermark]

I do think that he's one of the most deserving individuals who could win.