|
Post by aliciafoxfan on Dec 30, 2014 14:49:09 GMT -5
So many of these threads bring up some sort of aesthetic thing about a wrestler or something that requires visual analysis but NEVER have pictures! I read this in Sandow's voice and laughed.
|
|
|
Post by The Tee Why on Dec 30, 2014 16:05:39 GMT -5
So many of these threads bring up some sort of aesthetic thing about a wrestler or something that requires visual analysis but NEVER have pictures! People are scared to post them cause someone will jump up their ass about objectifying women
|
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Dec 30, 2014 16:34:31 GMT -5
So many of these threads bring up some sort of aesthetic thing about a wrestler or something that requires visual analysis but NEVER have pictures! People are scared to post them cause someone will jump up their ass about objectifying women Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual.
|
|
|
Post by Some Guy on Dec 30, 2014 16:35:30 GMT -5
I'mm all for it if we get gratuitous shots of Tyson last night.
|
|
|
Post by SkullTrauma on Dec 30, 2014 17:20:30 GMT -5
|
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Dec 30, 2014 17:35:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Dec 30, 2014 17:39:29 GMT -5
Eh, it's totally possible to point out an attractive person and say as such without going full on objectifying. There's a happy medium to be found between prude and pervert, one would hope. That said, Darling Nikki is amazing. If John won't marry ya:
|
|
|
Post by "Gentleman" AJ Powell on Dec 30, 2014 17:41:13 GMT -5
People are scared to post them cause someone will jump up their ass about objectifying women Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual.
|
|
Sephiroth
Wade Wilson
Surviving
Posts: 28,830
Member is Online
|
Post by Sephiroth on Dec 30, 2014 17:42:30 GMT -5
People are scared to post them cause someone will jump up their ass about objectifying women Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual. That's why boss threads about walking down the street nude traumatized me so much
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2014 17:45:25 GMT -5
I think the general rule is don't say perverted things or extreme close ups. This post is okay because this moment happened in the match. If the post was a gif that's 100x zoom on her ass or someone said something really perverted it's not okay. Am I right?
|
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Dec 30, 2014 18:21:15 GMT -5
I think the general rule is don't say perverted things or extreme close ups. This post is okay because this moment happened in the match. If the post was a gif that's 100x zoom on her ass or someone said something really perverted it's not okay. Am I right? I believe that's exactly the rule; stuff like that is fine in context but when we get shit like we had during the AJ heyday where every gif posted of her allowed us to see her anus and labia, it becomes an issue.
|
|
|
Post by "Gentleman" AJ Powell on Dec 30, 2014 18:23:46 GMT -5
I think the general rule is don't say perverted things or extreme close ups. This post is okay because this moment happened in the match. If the post was a gif that's 100x zoom on her ass or someone said something really perverted it's not okay. Am I right? I believe that's exactly the rule; stuff like that is fine in context but when we get shit like we had during the AJ heyday where every gif posted of her allowed us to see her anus and labia, it becomes an issue. And the comments that followed said GIFs.
|
|
|
Post by The Trashman on Dec 30, 2014 18:33:08 GMT -5
People are scared to post them cause someone will jump up their ass about objectifying women Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual. People choose what threads they go into.
|
|
|
Post by aliciafoxfan on Dec 30, 2014 18:44:32 GMT -5
Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual. People choose what threads they go into. Maybe but as a Woman, I don't like to read skeezy posts about what guys want to do to a certain diva, its creepy and gross.
|
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Dec 30, 2014 18:47:12 GMT -5
Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual. People choose what threads they go into. And a lot of legitimate threads have been derailed by perviness, what's your point? FAN isn't/shouldn't be a place where people have to be careful about what threads they go into because other people don't know when it's inappropriate to talk about their dicks. I mean, there are two female posters here that I call my sisters and they almost quit posting because of the perviness around here on multiple occasions.
|
|
|
Post by "Gentleman" AJ Powell on Dec 30, 2014 18:47:43 GMT -5
Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual. People choose what threads they go into. They shouldn't have to avoid certain threads simply because a select few can't go without making gross comments or screencapping every millisecond that the camera focuses on an arse or boobs. If people feel the need to make such comments, I'm fairly certain porn sites allow you to make comments these days!
|
|
Lila
El Dandy
Slip N Slide World Champion 1997
Posts: 8,905
|
Post by Lila on Dec 30, 2014 18:49:37 GMT -5
How is this thread even allowed without pics? So many of these threads bring up some sort of aesthetic thing about a wrestler or something that requires visual analysis but NEVER have pictures! www.google.com/Use it and stop being lazy.
|
|
Hawk Hart
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Sold his organs.
The Best There Is, the Best There Was, and the Best That There Ever Will Be
Posts: 15,296
|
Post by Hawk Hart on Dec 30, 2014 18:51:33 GMT -5
Eh, it's totally possible to point out an attractive person and say as such without going full on objectifying. There's a happy medium to be found between prude and pervert, one would hope. That said, Darling Nikki is amazing. If John won't marry ya: I'm so happy I'm not the only one that calls her Darling Nikki.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2014 18:53:28 GMT -5
Yeah, f*** following a rule that allows this board to operate without people being made to feel uncomfortable by having gratuitous T&A shots and people being overtly sexual. People choose what threads they go into. f***ing THIS. You don't walk into a horror movie and complain about people getting killed. People here will go out of their way to click on something JUST to bitch about having to see it.There's a happy medium between restricting people's actions and catering to those who those actions might offend and we're just not there at the moment. When people are actively trying to find stuff that offends them the act of banning it isn't the right track. You're only allowing yourself (and everyone else around) to be bullied by the sensibilities of the most conservative. I'm not advocating porn threads... I'm just saying that when the thread is specifically about "Nikki's ass" if someone clicks on it then complains about seeing a picture of Nikki's ass that might be their own damn fault. At that point the solution isn't banning visual representation of the topic... it's either banning the topic or telling those who might be offended to steer clear.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2014 18:59:50 GMT -5
People choose what threads they go into. They shouldn't have to avoid certain threads simply because a select few can't go without making gross comments or screencapping every millisecond that the camera focuses on an arse or boobs. If people feel the need to make such comments, I'm fairly certain porn sites allow you to make comments these days! Again, I agree that people shouldn't have to see anything sexual that they don't want to see. Anything that offends their sensibilities. That being said if they click on a thread with the title "Nikki Bella's Ass" they should absolutely expect to see an image of Nikki Bella's ass. Granted people getting crude with what they'd like to do WITH said ass is going too far in a public forum, but when it comes to pictures of the subject matter... THEY CLICKED ON THE THREAD. I'm not for anyone being offended... I just refuse to be reigned in by others running around specifically LOOKING for stuff to be offended by (which I feel the "wall" of having to click on the thread after seeing the title covers).
|
|