|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Dec 15, 2015 11:15:55 GMT -5
Like say Barrett was did a sneak attack at TLC (Usos have the ladder match injury angle at least) or on RAW say if they try to save they (Ambrose and Usos) are fired and Reigns loses if they come out. Something. Unless I missed it on RAW since I was flipping between RAW and the football game.
|
|
|
|
Post by warriorthug4edge on Dec 15, 2015 11:20:21 GMT -5
You COULD conceivably say he was getting treatment from Owens' attack (and having Ziggler powerbombed on top of him), but they should establish that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2015 11:21:12 GMT -5
Ambrose and Reigns have explained a few times in interviews that they don't help each other at times because they're grown men who should be able to handle things on their own at times. Makes sense to me I guess. Another time Ambrose said he was getting treated from an attack which is why he didn't help. Believe it or not I find it interesting that those two explain what happen in interviews unlike a lot of stars who just leave it as be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Dec 15, 2015 11:35:14 GMT -5
Ambrose and Reigns have explained a few times in interviews that they don't help each other at times because they're grown men who should be able to handle things on their own at times. Makes sense to me I guess. Another time Ambrose said he was getting treated from an attack which is why he didn't help. Believe it or not I find it interesting that those two explain what happen in interviews unlike a lot of stars who just leave it as be. Sure that handle things on your own makes sense when its a one on one match or sanctioned multiman match that you aren't involved it. But when its a 3 on 1 attack its just stupid. Babyfaces are stupid. |
|
Bo Rida
Fry's dog Seymour
Pulled one over on everyone.
Got away with it, this time.
Posts: 23,590
Member is Online
|
Post by Bo Rida on Dec 15, 2015 11:38:47 GMT -5
WWE have some of the most talented and creative writers in the world so they wouldn't make oversights like this. Therefore they must be deliberately saving up these incidents until it gets to the point Roman can't trust Ambrose any more.
It all started a long time ago when Dean went AWOL against The Wyatts and his stable-mates didn't fully believe the explanation for his absence.
It's great long-term story-telling.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Dec 15, 2015 11:44:17 GMT -5
WWE have some of the most talented and creative writers in the world so they wouldn't make oversights like this. Therefore they must be deliberately saving up these incidents until it gets to the point Roman can't trust Ambrose any more. It all started a long time ago when Dean went AWOL against The Wyatts and his stable-mates didn't fully believe the explanation for his absence. It's great long-term story-telling. It would be if it pays off but I doubt it will. Hell even if one of them turns on the other they won't mention this. |
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Dec 15, 2015 11:59:23 GMT -5
WWE have some of the most talented and creative writers in the world so they wouldn't make oversights like this. Therefore they must be deliberately saving up these incidents until it gets to the point Roman can't trust Ambrose any more. It all started a long time ago when Dean went AWOL against The Wyatts and his stable-mates didn't fully believe the explanation for his absence. It's great long-term story-telling. This is sarcasm right? |
|
Bo Rida
Fry's dog Seymour
Pulled one over on everyone.
Got away with it, this time.
Posts: 23,590
Member is Online
|
Post by Bo Rida on Dec 15, 2015 15:41:14 GMT -5
WWE have some of the most talented and creative writers in the world so they wouldn't make oversights like this. Therefore they must be deliberately saving up these incidents until it gets to the point Roman can't trust Ambrose any more. It all started a long time ago when Dean went AWOL against The Wyatts and his stable-mates didn't fully believe the explanation for his absence. It's great long-term story-telling. This is sarcasm right? I take inspiration from WWE's 50/50 booking, 50% Sarcasm, 50% genuine point. |
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Dec 15, 2015 15:43:32 GMT -5
The entire point of giving Roman a stable, I thought, was to at some point have the moment of crowd ignition where the dastardly heels come in to interfere, only for hot babyfaces to make the save and keep them at bay. Like, that is literally the point of faces uniting against a heel faction if it's not Survivor Series season. The only other reason for The Family would be if they were taking falls for him, and not only are they not even doing that, but Roman seems capable of fighting everybody off himself.
It's just crap writing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fake Jesus on Dec 15, 2015 17:03:06 GMT -5
Ambrose and Reigns have explained a few times in interviews that they don't help each other at times because they're grown men who should be able to handle things on their own at times. Makes sense to me I guess. Another time Ambrose said he was getting treated from an attack which is why he didn't help. Believe it or not I find it interesting that those two explain what happen in interviews unlike a lot of stars who just leave it as be. Sure that handle things on your own makes sense when its a one on one match or sanctioned multiman match that you aren't involved it. But when its a 3 on 1 attack its just stupid. Babyfaces are stupid. They're crap friends, too. I mean if I saw some guys I really didn't like beating the crap out of my buddy, I'd jump in as soon as I could. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2015 17:11:29 GMT -5
Dean recommended Riot Control helps out.
Roman said, "Nah, I'll handle this myself."
|
|
|
|
Post by xCompackx on Dec 15, 2015 17:13:22 GMT -5
WWE have some of the most talented and creative writers in the world so they wouldn't make oversights like this. Therefore they must be deliberately saving up these incidents until it gets to the point Roman can't trust Ambrose any more. It all started a long time ago when Dean went AWOL against The Wyatts and his stable-mates didn't fully believe the explanation for his absence. It's great long-term story-telling. Didn't they do something similar with Ryback when he turned heel? |
|
saintpat
El Dandy
Release the hounds!!!
Posts: 7,664
|
Post by saintpat on Dec 15, 2015 17:55:44 GMT -5
Ambrose and Reigns have explained a few times in interviews that they don't help each other at times because they're grown men who should be able to handle things on their own at times. Makes sense to me I guess. Another time Ambrose said he was getting treated from an attack which is why he didn't help. Believe it or not I find it interesting that those two explain what happen in interviews unlike a lot of stars who just leave it as be. This is why it doesn't bother me at all. Because they HAVE explained it, more than once. I don't feel like we need to be beaten over the head with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 15, 2015 19:05:48 GMT -5
Ambrose and Reigns have explained a few times in interviews that they don't help each other at times because they're grown men who should be able to handle things on their own at times. Makes sense to me I guess. Another time Ambrose said he was getting treated from an attack which is why he didn't help. Believe it or not I find it interesting that those two explain what happen in interviews unlike a lot of stars who just leave it as be. Sure that handle things on your own makes sense when its a one on one match or sanctioned multiman match that you aren't involved it. But when its a 3 on 1 attack its just stupid. Babyfaces are stupid. Yeah, that's nonsensical hahaha. "Dude, I know it's 3-on-1 and this is the title you've been chasing for like a year and I know this same group actually tried to screw me over in the past but nah, you need to stand on your own two feet." Then why the f*** have these goofballs been running around as Roman's "Family?" This is just bad storytelling. It's a hole in the story but it's a TV show so we aren't supposed to think about it that hard in their minds. |
|
|
|
Post by cahuette on Dec 15, 2015 20:36:52 GMT -5
The reason is really simple, Roman is the manliest manly man in the land, why help the greatest wrestler they have right now? I mean come on the guy is awesome, he even beat HHH, such a cool strong beautiful man, he fought so hard against the establishment to get where he is too, they didn't want him to be the champ but he superman punched all of them, such a cool guy, no need for any help from that midcarder who barely managed to stay over after losing EVERYTHING.
|
|
saintpat
El Dandy
Release the hounds!!!
Posts: 7,664
|
Post by saintpat on Dec 15, 2015 20:38:45 GMT -5
It's like the Cena thing: if he does a run-in to help someone, he's interjecting himself in someone else's chance to shine; if he doesn't he's criticized for not being a good friend.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2015 20:43:16 GMT -5
Roman doesn't want his hair to develop a lunatic fringe.
Dean won't share his concession stand food while watching the big screen backstage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips Has Left on Dec 15, 2015 20:52:53 GMT -5
He's in the back. With some tittys.
|
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Dec 15, 2015 20:54:50 GMT -5
Ambrose and Reigns have explained a few times in interviews that they don't help each other at times because they're grown men who should be able to handle things on their own at times. Makes sense to me I guess. Another time Ambrose said he was getting treated from an attack which is why he didn't help. Believe it or not I find it interesting that those two explain what happen in interviews unlike a lot of stars who just leave it as be. This is why it doesn't bother me at all. Because they HAVE explained it, more than once. I don't feel like we need to be beaten over the head with it. But they hardly ever mention this on commentary and they don't mention it on TV. Most of this stuff's been on WWE.com and the idea that people should check the website or YouTube for all the little etches of character development and explainations that won't be addressed at all to those who can't watch or don't want to check sounds ridiculous to me. This has bothered me for a while and it really doesn't take much effort to either have the commentators talk about Reigns being stubborn backfiring on him or cutting to the laid out bodies of his friends with the League gloating as they keep kicking the hell out of Reigns. |
|
saintpat
El Dandy
Release the hounds!!!
Posts: 7,664
|
Post by saintpat on Dec 15, 2015 21:08:16 GMT -5
This is why it doesn't bother me at all. Because they HAVE explained it, more than once. I don't feel like we need to be beaten over the head with it. But they hardly ever mention this on commentary and they don't mention it on TV. Most of this stuff's been on WWE.com and the idea that people should check the website or YouTube for all the little etches of character development and explainations that won't be addressed at all to those who can't watch or don't want to check sounds ridiculous to me. This has bothered me for a while and it really doesn't take much effort to either have the commentators talk about Reigns being stubborn backfiring on him or cutting to the laid out bodies of his friends with the League gloating as they keep kicking the hell out of Reigns. I think it would sound forced. "OMG, the League of Nations are attacking Roman Reigns ... And where is Dean Ambrose you ask? ... Well he and Roman have an understanding that they should handle their own business and don't want the other to interfere ... So that's why ... Wow, what a kick by Rusev." I'd prefer they give the audience enough credit to figure out a few things without pointing it out as if we were in kindergarten. I wonder how many people who feel this way really can't figure it out or just think others aren't bright enough to fill in the blanks. But that's just me. |
|
