|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 11, 2016 23:45:16 GMT -5
Still trying to figure out how Titus O Neil has a winning streak... or more so, why... Two RAW wins on the trot, as well as one on Main Event. He's two wins away from the 10 bonus points for five in a row.
|
|
Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 244,772
Member is Online
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Jan 11, 2016 23:58:33 GMT -5
Still trying to figure out how Titus O Neil has a winning streak... or more so, why... Two RAW wins on the trot, as well as one on Main Event. He's two wins away from the 10 bonus points for five in a row. FIVE!?!
|
|
Jasper Troy Bolton
Ozymandius
MAMMA MIA! CRUISERLICIOUS!
GIIIGIIIGIIIGIIIGIGI
Posts: 60,629
Member is Online
|
Post by Jasper Troy Bolton on Jan 12, 2016 2:37:44 GMT -5
I'd just like to say how much I love this thread.
Also, TITUS O'NEIL P4P SECOND BEST IN THE WORLD LET'S GO
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 13, 2016 22:32:40 GMT -5
Updated for Main Event and NXT (and fancy new graphics which I'm still working on).
The Ascension are one loss away from taking a ten point penalty for five consecutive losses, while we finally get some more women ranked for the year thanks to our NXT battle royal.
|
|
|
Post by mhamm05 on Jan 13, 2016 23:08:20 GMT -5
This is just as awesome as I initially hoped it'd be. Thanks for putting this together!
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 14, 2016 22:25:55 GMT -5
Updated for SmackDown.
How about that Heath Slater, hm?
EDIT: Minor tweaks made, as WWE.com declared the main event a DQ win for Ambrose and Neville, not a double countout. Therefore, points for Ambrose/Neville, points lost for Owens/Sheamus.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 48,465
|
Post by Dub H on Jan 14, 2016 23:00:19 GMT -5
Updated for SmackDown. How about that Heath Slater, hm? Slatergator is top 2 and 3 COINCIDENCE?
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 15, 2016 22:58:05 GMT -5
And we finish another week with Superstars.
The Ascension claim the first 10 point penalties of the year for five consecutive TV losses.
|
|
|
Post by hbkid718 on Jan 18, 2016 13:59:00 GMT -5
Updated for SmackDown. How about that Heath Slater, hm? EDIT: Minor tweaks made, as WWE.com declared the main event a DQ win for Ambrose and Neville, not a double countout. Therefore, points for Ambrose/Neville, points lost for Owens/Sheamus. I thought the match was a No Contest, even though .com called it a DQ. So, I tweeted the referee Chad Patton and asked him what his official decision was and he told me that he lost control of the match, therefore it was a No Contest.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 18, 2016 19:31:08 GMT -5
I'm just going by what WWE.com had it as, which was the DQ win for Ambrose and Neville.
|
|
|
Post by hbkid718 on Jan 18, 2016 23:36:35 GMT -5
I'm just going by what WWE.com had it as, which was the DQ win for Ambrose and Neville. OK. No problem. I also have everyone as participants of last week's Raw main event, while you just counted Reigns & Owens.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 18, 2016 23:57:50 GMT -5
I'm just going by what WWE.com had it as, which was the DQ win for Ambrose and Neville. OK. No problem. I also have everyone as participants of last week's Raw main event, while you just counted Reigns & Owens. In my opinion, I couldn't really count the others as having been in the match when they weren't actually IN the match, because it was thrown out before the first one-on-one fall of Reigns v Owens. Hell, if they hadn't actually been at ringside, we would have been none the wiser whether or not they WERE in the match to begin with. Strangely enough, because it was a no-contest, and because everyone in it has appeared on RAW for the month anyways, the points would be the exact same.
|
|
Reflecto
Hank Scorpio
The Sorceress' Knight
Posts: 6,847
|
Post by Reflecto on Jan 19, 2016 0:07:53 GMT -5
Updated for Main Event and NXT (and fancy new graphics which I'm still working on). The Ascension are one loss away from taking a ten point penalty for five consecutive losses, while we finally get some more women ranked for the year thanks to our NXT battle royal. The graphics are great. One question due to all the non-contracted performers in NXT, though: With non-contract performers, what will the status be for non-WWE televised matches be? It's an unlikely situation, of course- but we already have at least one situation from the battle royal. {Spoiler}where Dionna Purazzo appeared in a WWE battle royal and a battle royal for TNA during the tapings.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 19, 2016 0:11:41 GMT -5
Updated for Main Event and NXT (and fancy new graphics which I'm still working on). The Ascension are one loss away from taking a ten point penalty for five consecutive losses, while we finally get some more women ranked for the year thanks to our NXT battle royal. The graphics are great. One question due to all the non-contracted performers in NXT, though: With non-contract performers, what will the status be for non-WWE televised matches be? It's an unlikely situation, of course- but we already have at least one situation from the battle royal. where Dionna Purazzo appeared in a WWE battle royal and a battle royal for TNA during the tapings. Only WWE-sanctioned matches are applicable towards the rankings. And while uncontracted talents do have their scores tracked, they're not placed on the official rankings until they are listed on WWE.com as official roster talent. Same thing for unlisted contracted talents like a Liv Morgan or an Aliyah down in NXT.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 19, 2016 0:51:27 GMT -5
And updated for RAW.
The appearance points definitely provide an interesting twist in that one can lose, but because it's their first RAW match for the month, they actually gain points. Just look at Tyler Breeze and Tamina. It'll be interesting to see how the Rumble changes things.
|
|
Jasper Troy Bolton
Ozymandius
MAMMA MIA! CRUISERLICIOUS!
GIIIGIIIGIIIGIIIGIGI
Posts: 60,629
Member is Online
|
Post by Jasper Troy Bolton on Jan 19, 2016 0:53:40 GMT -5
The fact that the weird MLK Day team takes up the entire top 5 except for number 1 is a beautiful thing.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 19, 2016 0:54:54 GMT -5
The fact that the weird MLK Day team takes up the entire top 5 except for number 1 is a beautiful thing. See, racking up them wins on Superstars and Main Event ARE important. Henry and R-Truth are on three straight wins, Hell... O'Neil is one away from BONUS POINTS. I wouldn't want to be Tyler Breeze on Main Event tomorrow.
|
|
Jasper Troy Bolton
Ozymandius
MAMMA MIA! CRUISERLICIOUS!
GIIIGIIIGIIIGIIIGIGI
Posts: 60,629
Member is Online
|
Post by Jasper Troy Bolton on Jan 19, 2016 0:59:27 GMT -5
The fact that the weird MLK Day team takes up the entire top 5 except for number 1 is a beautiful thing. See, racking up them wins on Superstars and Main Event ARE important. Henry and R-Truth are on three straight wins, Hell... O'Neil is one away from BONUS POINTS. I wouldn't want to be Tyler Breeze on Main Event tomorrow. I'm gonna lose my f***ing mind when Titus hits #1
|
|
|
Post by hbkid718 on Jan 19, 2016 12:50:01 GMT -5
OK. No problem. I also have everyone as participants of last week's Raw main event, while you just counted Reigns & Owens. In my opinion, I couldn't really count the others as having been in the match when they weren't actually IN the match, because it was thrown out before the first one-on-one fall of Reigns v Owens. Hell, if they hadn't actually been at ringside, we would have been none the wiser whether or not they WERE in the match to begin with. Strangely enough, because it was a no-contest, and because everyone in it has appeared on RAW for the month anyways, the points would be the exact same. I get your point. True, if no one was out there, then we wouldn't have known who else was in the match. But, I counted it as a Gauntlet Match, with one guy vs the rest, so that's why I counted everyone. They could've easily made it a Handicap Match and the result would've been the same.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 20, 2016 23:25:41 GMT -5
Updated for Main Event and NXT.
Neville is slowly putting together an impressive run. The guy has been strange like that in his main roster run, in that he usually DOES win more often than not, yet because he's not in a lot of ongoing storylines it looks like he's being held down.
|
|