|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Jan 5, 2016 17:16:24 GMT -5
Not this year with so many injuries and all, but I could dig it with a healthier roster and shorter times between entrances. Also, if it is that big for storyline purposes so people don't get worried it'll stay 50 men like they did for the Rumble with 40.
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jan 5, 2016 18:29:12 GMT -5
Maybe. If WWE insist on having surprise nostalgia entrants, then there should be more than the usual 30.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 5, 2016 18:35:29 GMT -5
Hell yes. The countdown and entrances are my favorite part, and I always get a little bummed out when it gets into the high 20's because I know the fun is about to stop.
|
|
JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,786
|
Post by JCBaggee on Jan 5, 2016 18:52:15 GMT -5
The problem with a 50 man Rumble is that the match would be over 2 hours. That being said, yeah, I could be down for it. The 40 man Rumble was great, because it allowed for a few more surprises than usual, but doing it yearly would burn out pretty quick.
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Jan 5, 2016 18:55:52 GMT -5
Nah. I feel like they couldn't get enough interesting competitors to actually sustain a 50 person Rumble without there being tons of geeks out there just to up the elimination number of the bigger names. I like that the Rumble is 30 people and like it even more when guys actually have to win qualifying matches to get in. Really made the match feel like this prestigious thing. It needs to be like the All Star Game or the Pro Bowl. The absolute best that the company has to offer all collide in one match.
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Jan 5, 2016 18:56:58 GMT -5
no
|
|
|
Post by lionelp on Jan 5, 2016 19:06:42 GMT -5
Hell no, that's like a whole PPV dedicated to the match.
I'd like it to be cut down if anything to 20 superstars
|
|
baracklesnar
Team Rocket
"Lunatic Fringe" Dean Ambrose
Posts: 860
|
Post by baracklesnar on Jan 5, 2016 19:15:12 GMT -5
The Royal Rumble should be like a cricket match, in that it goes for four to five days with intermittent tea and biscuit breaks.
|
|
|
Post by Savage Gambino on Jan 5, 2016 20:14:28 GMT -5
|
|
cool
Samurai Cop
Posts: 2,195
|
Post by cool on Jan 5, 2016 20:19:38 GMT -5
no because wwe will want del rio to win it like he did the 40 man one and we do not want that horror again
|
|
kevin
El Dandy
Posts: 7,503
|
Post by kevin on Jan 5, 2016 20:26:49 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind but I would rather they do another smaller 20 man Rumble later in the year.
|
|
ayumidah
Wade Wilson
Don't bother pretending I seem fine, I like that I'm a mess
Posts: 27,032
Member is Online
|
Post by ayumidah on Jan 5, 2016 20:27:52 GMT -5
I guess I could see them doing something like that for, say, if the Rumble makes it to its 50th anniversary but... just for the sake of? No thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jan 5, 2016 22:09:40 GMT -5
Nah, the forty man one showed that they don't really have many ideas.
Plus with that many slots, you'd get the mid 90s ones where you had Kwang, eighty seven year old Mil Mascaras etc.
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Jan 5, 2016 22:21:39 GMT -5
I'd like it but not for the rumble. I'd rather they do it on Raw with the nxt roster in it. At least it would be a unique episode instead of the usual live rerun.
|
|
Lancers
El Dandy
Oh you
Posts: 7,951
|
Post by Lancers on Jan 5, 2016 22:23:45 GMT -5
F*** it. Let's go 60! And let's add a couple of more rings to spice it up! I like to see some wrestling promotion pull that off.
|
|
RIHT
Hank Scorpio
Wanted a title with "YOU'RE WELCOME!" Close enough.
Hey-yo.
Posts: 5,897
|
Post by RIHT on Jan 5, 2016 23:00:29 GMT -5
WWE should do a Rumble that lasts an entire 3 hour PPV, with, like, 100 guys.
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Jan 5, 2016 23:08:33 GMT -5
It would run out of steam and interest by the time it hit 50, not to mention hit some serious issues with repetition. That's just altogether way too long to run that kind of thing.
|
|
|
Post by tigermaskxxxvii on Jan 5, 2016 23:14:29 GMT -5
The Royal Rumble should be like a cricket match, in that it goes for four to five days with intermittent tea and biscuit breaks. The Royal Rumble: Send Snacks!
|
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 27,976
|
Post by chazraps on Jan 5, 2016 23:17:45 GMT -5
Dude, I don't know. I really can't talk right now. I'll get back to you later, cool?
|
|
|
Post by berlynwright on Jan 6, 2016 0:02:56 GMT -5
add 10 more and call it world war instead
and have JBL bury it, we did better than WCW maggle!
|
|