Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2016 7:41:39 GMT -5
Only way I don't see Reigns winning is if they want to spice things up with some sort of interference/stipulation that makes the mania main event end up being Reigns/Ambrose/HHH.
Reigns is winning at mania either way.
|
|
Tom Turkey
Ozymandius
The King of North America
Posts: 61,994
Member is Online
|
Post by Tom Turkey on Jan 26, 2016 9:29:13 GMT -5
The guy with the biggest pecs.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Workin On My Night Cheese on Jan 26, 2016 9:31:27 GMT -5
I'd be very, VERY surprised if it wasn't Reigns. But as long as the rest of the WM card is good, I can deal with Triple H/Reigns as the main.
|
|
|
Post by sonofblaine on Jan 26, 2016 10:40:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Workin On My Night Cheese on Jan 26, 2016 10:43:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MrElijah on Jan 26, 2016 12:08:49 GMT -5
Usually Roman would have 8 1/3 of chance but since fellow Samoan, Joe somehow won, Roman should overcome the odds.
But then I remembered Brock breaks logic and Roman's chances drastic go down.
And Dean? He KNOWS he can't beat Brock so he's not even going to try!
|
|
Professor Chaos
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bringer of Destruction and Maker of Doom
Posts: 16,332
|
Post by Professor Chaos on Jan 26, 2016 12:15:20 GMT -5
Ambrose could win then Reigns invokes his rematch clause at WrestleMania for a triple threat.
|
|
|
Post by darkjourney on Jan 26, 2016 12:30:54 GMT -5
Reigns obviously. How can they be so damn predictable with their creative direction? I guess Lesnar could eat the pin if the Wyatts run in and demolish him with weapons. It wouldn't make Brock look to weak.
But herein lies the problem. Wyatt is just going to lose another Mania (What is that like 3 in a row?). this does nothing to help Wyatt.
Im assuming Lesnar gets pinned as if Reigns pin Ambrose, the crowd will go ape shit and boo Reigns out of the building.
|
|
|
Post by sunnytaker on Jan 26, 2016 12:38:18 GMT -5
I thought the options were going to be 1) roman 2) reigns 3) roman reigns 4) the big guy from the SHIELD
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Jan 26, 2016 14:38:12 GMT -5
So, Mr. Reigns, you admit you speared babygurl. What do you have to say in your defence? Mr. Reigns, your silence will only incriminate you further... No, Mr. Reigns, don't take your anger out on me! Get back! Get back! M-Mr. Reigns! NOOOO! {Spoiler}*Dramatisation, may not have happened.
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Jan 26, 2016 14:43:53 GMT -5
For a brief, shining moment, I thought that Dean was winning the Rumble by screwing Roman over.
But that clearly isn't happening. It is so painfully obviously Roman winning this, and Dean is just there to eat a fall so that Brock doesn't have to.
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Jan 26, 2016 14:56:35 GMT -5
4) the big guy from the SHIELD Mack? I'd be down for that.
|
|
Tom Turkey
Ozymandius
The King of North America
Posts: 61,994
Member is Online
|
Post by Tom Turkey on Jan 26, 2016 15:07:12 GMT -5
4) the big guy from the SHIELD Mack? I'd be down for that. good. Either Daisy or May or Mockingbird can wail on Steph.
|
|
|
Post by Ron Woodsman aka Shempaholic on Jan 26, 2016 15:07:19 GMT -5
Yep, Wyatts take out Lesnar and Roman pins Ambrose. I would expect Roman and Dean to feud this summer with Dean as the heel, and Roman will get booed out of the building every night (except on Smackdown of course). We'll probably get our Shield triple-threat at next year's Mania, with Reigns (celebrating a year as champion) vs. Ambrose vs. Rollins.
|
|