|
Post by -Lithium- on Jun 8, 2016 16:29:01 GMT -5
When HHH does it we call it burial.... In fact when anyone else does it it's called burial... To be fair HHH rarely questions someone's manhood like Stephanie does every week. HHH's promo burials are often about the guys wrestling ability, stupid appearance, mic ability, not being elite like he is, etc. Stephanie's are often more vicious, frequently asks people if they are going to cry when they look like they are about too, brings up their family and children and questions their worth as a father, and often attacks them when they can't fight back. At least with a HHH promo burial the guy doesn't look like he's about to cry and often always tries to fight HHH in the end or goes face to face. Nothing annoyed me more than in 2012 when Heyman and HHH were talking and Heyman made a passing reference to the fact that HHH had kids, and Steph immediately stormed out doing with that stupid "Grr I IS scary!!!!" face on, and told Heyman that he wasn't ever allowed to even mention they had kids...and went on to talk about how Heymans kids would see him as a failure. Then of course when Heyman mentioned (again, just the fact that their kids existed) them again, Steph got to beat the shit out of him. It was such bullshit. One of the first times I remember getting so annoyed with Stephanies Queen Badass Bitch bullshit. It's even more annoying when you think of how Heyman had a ton of success with so little, and Stephanie is in the position shes at solely because she came out of Vince McMahons dick, and has overseen a massive dropout in viewership under her watch despite WWE being the only major fed around and having tons of money to play with for production and talent. Stephanie McMahon isn't even in the same galaxy as it comes to Heyman when it comes to talent. Also, in regards to HHH...people talk about burials and the Reign of Terror. Atleast with HHH he cheated. It's not as if he beat Kane, Booker, Steiner, Nash, or Goldberg clean. It was shown everytime that HHH wasn't as good as he thought he was.
|
|
|
Post by kendrickisking on Jun 8, 2016 16:37:31 GMT -5
I understand the idea that Rollins or Ambrose can't hit Stephanie because of sponsors but wy can't Charlotte or Sasha Banks? There's women's wrestling matches on RAW every week. The fans hate Stephanie. Let a female wrestler beat her up. You'd make a great female babyface in one segment.
|
|
Sephiroth
Wade Wilson
Surviving
Posts: 29,302
|
Post by Sephiroth on Jun 8, 2016 16:45:25 GMT -5
But she talks down to all sexes equally. Basically Triple H often buries you as a wrestler while Stephanie often buries the wrestlers character. Like outside of The Rock, Dusty Rhodes (in a unscripted moment), John Cena, and Rhonda Rousey who else really stepped up against her? Like she's the worst heel because she never ever gets her comeuppance. And when she does it's brushed off a week later like the last appearance of Vickie Guerrero. Like basically she often talks down to people in such a personal way where she attacks and destroys the wrestlers character that it's beyond burial. There's not a lot of words that really describe it than emasculating. Like do you have a better suggestion outside of burial? To be fair, and I'm not at all defending Stephanie's character or use on TV in general here, but I'm not sure there's a whole lot they could do to give her comeuppance just because of WWE's partners and such. I mean, we've seen Stephanie take Stunners, DDTs, and stuff in the past, but I don't think they're willing to risk bad PR just to Steph can "get what's coming to her". Even Roman's spear at WrestleMania was played up as being unintentional. She could get a bucket of crud thrown on her-no hitting and still guess gives her some commpuance.
|
|
tenshi
Patti Mayonnaise
Probably more memorable than a Charlotte title reign
Posts: 34,868
|
Post by tenshi on Jun 8, 2016 17:14:11 GMT -5
For the sake of being a mind screw, I'd like her to berate Triple H for letting her get speared by Roman Reigns and losing the title at Dallas, act like nothing happened and then ignore her so he can spend time behind the workings of NXT.
|
|
|
Post by Diamond Cutter Out of Nowhere! on Jun 8, 2016 17:19:06 GMT -5
Are we at that stage of meta yet where Stephanie could be in the ring, emasculating herself? Just tearing herself down and not responding to it before walking out dejected?
|
|
|
Post by Mr PONYMANIA Mr Jenzie on Jun 8, 2016 20:13:59 GMT -5
Are we at that stage of meta yet where Stephanie could be in the ring, emasculating herself? Just tearing herself down and not responding to it before walking out dejected? hehe me thinking right before i cam back into this thread, was they just stuck a mirror in front of her ..... because i KNOW that seeing two stephanies would make me EXPOLDE in glee
|
|
|
Post by warriorthug4edge on Jun 9, 2016 0:34:19 GMT -5
To be fair HHH rarely questions someone's manhood like Stephanie does every week. HHH's promo burials are often about the guys wrestling ability, stupid appearance, mic ability, not being elite like he is, etc. Stephanie's are often more vicious, frequently asks people if they are going to cry when they look like they are about too, brings up their family and children and questions their worth as a father, and often attacks them when they can't fight back. At least with a HHH promo burial the guy doesn't look like he's about to cry and often always tries to fight HHH in the end or goes face to face. Nothing annoyed me more than in 2012 when Heyman and HHH were talking and Heyman made a passing reference to the fact that HHH had kids, and Steph immediately stormed out doing with that stupid "Grr I IS scary!!!!" face on, and told Heyman that he wasn't ever allowed to even mention they had kids...and went on to talk about how Heymans kids would see him as a failure. Then of course when Heyman mentioned (again, just the fact that their kids existed) them again, Steph got to beat the shit out of him. It was such bullshit. One of the first times I remember getting so annoyed with Stephanies Queen Badass Bitch bullshit. It's even more annoying when you think of how Heyman had a ton of success with so little, and Stephanie is in the position shes at solely because she came out of Vince McMahons dick, and has overseen a massive dropout in viewership under her watch despite WWE being the only major fed around and having tons of money to play with for production and talent. Stephanie McMahon isn't even in the same galaxy as it comes to Heyman when it comes to talent. Also, in regards to HHH...people talk about burials and the Reign of Terror. Atleast with HHH he cheated. It's not as if he beat Kane, Booker, Steiner, Nash, or Goldberg clean. It was shown everytime that HHH wasn't as good as he thought he was. I never wanted Brock to come down more than that night.
|
|
Lt. Palumbo
Hank Scorpio
On again off again watcher of a wrestling TV show
Posts: 6,067
|
Post by Lt. Palumbo on Jun 9, 2016 3:10:05 GMT -5
And yet we never talk about all the years of HHH "emasculating" people, of Vince "emasculating" people, etc. etc. Are......are you new to wrestling? We've been doing that for years. Many years. And heck, at least HHH and Vince take beatings and comeuppances. Steph.......not so much... The literal phrase "emasculation" was used for HHH, Vince, etc.?
|
|