mrbananagrabber
King Koopa
Paul Heyman's unofficial joke writer
Posts: 11,881
|
Post by mrbananagrabber on Jul 4, 2016 12:37:08 GMT -5
The Lesnar vs Ambrose Mania feud build up was good, but the match was a dud, it did nothing for Lesnar who looked bored and made Ambrose look like an ineffective goof. And then the next night on Raw it was like it never happened. Pointless.
Now would be a perfect time to revisit it, though. Ambrose can fight for his title and his glory and The Conquerer has a good claim for being a contender.
This time though, if they want to cement Ambrose as a genuine contender, he needs to beat Brock. Not a sneaky win or a fluke, he needs to go to war with the guy but come out on top. And not in some ten minute bullshit match either.
Yes? No?
|
|
|
|
Post by CM Parish on Jul 4, 2016 12:42:33 GMT -5
No.
|
|
EyeofTyr
Hank Scorpio
Strange and Mystical
Posts: 5,744 
|
Post by EyeofTyr on Jul 4, 2016 12:45:21 GMT -5
It is a natural story to tell with Dean as champion, but if they are going to do it, it would be best served a little deeper into the reign. Give Dean a few hurtles before putting such a big one in front of him.
|
|
FinalGwen
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Particularly fond of muffins.
Posts: 16,523 
|
Post by FinalGwen on Jul 4, 2016 12:47:22 GMT -5
We already had to go through it once. Don't torture us further.
|
|
The Yes Man
Unicron
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 2,502
|
Post by The Yes Man on Jul 4, 2016 12:52:34 GMT -5
Only if Ambrose wins clean.
|
|
|
|
Post by Just call me D.j.m. on Jul 4, 2016 12:53:03 GMT -5
Nope.gif
|
|
|
|
Post by horseface on Jul 4, 2016 13:05:11 GMT -5
They really screwed up the first time. Don't think a do-over would have the same effect.
|
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jul 4, 2016 13:39:48 GMT -5
First that WM build and match sucked.
Second, he has to make past Roman at Battleground and that ain't happening, IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vincent Whiney on Jul 4, 2016 14:02:47 GMT -5
Only if Brock squashes him as bad as Cena.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jul 4, 2016 14:03:24 GMT -5
It amazed me, AMAZED ME, how much they messed up the build to that 'Mania match.
Like...after that Fast Lane triple threat, you would have thought they'd have Dean fight Lesnar everywhere and get up after a beating and then get the advantage right before.
Instead, Brock kills Dean, a bunch of hardcore wrestlers give him stupid crap that A. Couldn't be used properly in that match and B. Weren't even useful on the night.
On the flip side of that, if there was a rematch that was a redemption of that feud, I'd be down.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2016 14:43:50 GMT -5
It amazed me, AMAZED ME, how much they messed up the build to that 'Mania match. Like...after that Fast Lane triple threat, you would have thought they'd have Dean fight Lesnar everywhere and get up after a beating and then get the advantage right before. Instead, Brock kills Dean, a bunch of hardcore wrestlers give him stupid crap that A. Couldn't be used properly in that match and B. Weren't even useful on the night. On the flip side of that, if there was a rematch that was a redemption of that feud, I'd be down. Wrestlemania 32's booking was like Vince decided the day of the show that he was going to do a 180 on the booking just to "surprise" everyone, sensibility be damned. Logically, Dean should have won that match, or at least had it end with a double count with both men being unable to get up at the count of 10. Sasha should have won the title. Styles should have beat Jericho. New Day should have come to the aid of the legends, not the other way around. |
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jul 4, 2016 15:16:04 GMT -5
It amazed me, AMAZED ME, how much they messed up the build to that 'Mania match. Like...after that Fast Lane triple threat, you would have thought they'd have Dean fight Lesnar everywhere and get up after a beating and then get the advantage right before. Instead, Brock kills Dean, a bunch of hardcore wrestlers give him stupid crap that A. Couldn't be used properly in that match and B. Weren't even useful on the night. On the flip side of that, if there was a rematch that was a redemption of that feud, I'd be down. Wrestlemania 32's booking was like Vince decided the day of the show that he was going to do a 180 on the booking just to "surprise" everyone, sensibility be damned. Logically, Dean should have won that match, or at least had it end with a double count with both men being unable to get up at the count of 10. Sasha should have won the title. Styles should have beat Jericho. New Day should have come to the aid of the legends, not the other way around. Yeah, WrestleMania 32 was WWE finally showing that the building of a newer generation that was the whole narrative of WrestleMania 30 was a complete fluke. Seriously, even having Rock, Austin and Hogan out over the locker room at the start of the show now means absolutely nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by carp (SPC, Itoh Respect Army) on Jul 4, 2016 15:21:29 GMT -5
It amazed me, AMAZED ME, how much they messed up the build to that 'Mania match. Like...after that Fast Lane triple threat, you would have thought they'd have Dean fight Lesnar everywhere and get up after a beating and then get the advantage right before. Instead, Brock kills Dean, a bunch of hardcore wrestlers give him stupid crap that A. Couldn't be used properly in that match and B. Weren't even useful on the night. They needed the "guy gets the crap beat out of him but won't stay down" story for Shane, and they decided they couldn't book the same match twice on the same night. Because the Shane match had huge ramifications for the future of the WWE, because his loss meant the authority couldn't be disbanded and Shane had to not be on TV anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jul 4, 2016 15:23:00 GMT -5
No. Lesnar should be nowhere near the title picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jul 4, 2016 15:25:25 GMT -5
It amazed me, AMAZED ME, how much they messed up the build to that 'Mania match. Like...after that Fast Lane triple threat, you would have thought they'd have Dean fight Lesnar everywhere and get up after a beating and then get the advantage right before. Instead, Brock kills Dean, a bunch of hardcore wrestlers give him stupid crap that A. Couldn't be used properly in that match and B. Weren't even useful on the night. They needed the "guy gets the crap beat out of him but won't stay down" story for Shane, and they decided they couldn't book the same match twice on the same night. Because the Shane match had huge ramifications for the future of the WWE, because his loss meant the authority couldn't be disbanded and Shane had to not be on TV anymore. Oh, obviously. But then, just like 99% of WrestleMania, the result of that match didn't matter not one jolt. It either shows they have zero faith in an over guy or they realised what they did and went "Well shit! We need to backtrack like hell tomorrow!" Also didn't help that even with that story, Shane/Taker was godawful. |
|
Hanzo
Dennis Stamp
"You want Cena to go to ECW?!"
Posts: 4,666
|
Post by Hanzo on Jul 4, 2016 15:42:06 GMT -5
I actually see Triple H facing Dean at Summerslam. He never got his rematch.
|
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Jul 4, 2016 19:54:42 GMT -5
No. Enough of the stale ape man suplex city bullshit...
|
|
