JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,791
|
Post by JCBaggee on Jul 22, 2016 15:15:56 GMT -5
It's simple and clean, but a little too simple and clean. I dunno. We'll see how it is in execution.
|
|
|
Post by YAKMAN is ICHIBAN on Jul 22, 2016 15:16:46 GMT -5
....
Really?
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jul 22, 2016 15:16:58 GMT -5
Very reminiscent of the one Sabu fell off of.
|
|
|
Post by Alyce: Old Media Enthusiast on Jul 22, 2016 15:17:13 GMT -5
Smackdown Logo too 5 minutes in photoshop, baby
|
|
JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,791
|
Post by JCBaggee on Jul 22, 2016 15:18:50 GMT -5
Smackdown Logo too {Spoiler}{Spoiler} 5 minutes in photoshop, baby Yeah, I saw the Smackdown one a few weeks ago, this is the first I've seen of the Raw one. Odd, given how much the new Smackdown logo resembles the previous Raw logo, I fully expected it to stay the same so both shows would kind of match.
|
|
|
Post by YAKMAN is ICHIBAN on Jul 22, 2016 15:19:56 GMT -5
These are both freaking terrible.
|
|
Chad1m
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,664
|
Post by Chad1m on Jul 22, 2016 15:20:52 GMT -5
I dig the new SmackDown logo. The RAW logo looks like something I made in Paint when I was nine.
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jul 22, 2016 15:21:34 GMT -5
The Smackdown logo is a little too similar to the Impact logo, IMO. RAW isn't bad but I wouldn't say it is good either, the "W" just looks weird. Impact logo for those that don't know
|
|
|
Post by Friday Night SmackOwn on Jul 22, 2016 15:22:57 GMT -5
WWE Ram?
|
|
|
Post by KobashiChop on Jul 22, 2016 15:23:12 GMT -5
RAW logo is awful.
|
|
|
Post by Helen of Jasper Troy on Jul 22, 2016 15:23:25 GMT -5
That looks absolutely hideous
|
|
|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Jul 22, 2016 15:23:50 GMT -5
The W in the RAW logo looks too much like an upside down M than the actual letter.
|
|
|
Post by Friday Night SmackOwn on Jul 22, 2016 15:24:19 GMT -5
TNA: We'll take your timeslot. WwE: Fine. We'll "borrow" your show's logo. TNA:
|
|
|
Post by Wrestling Curmudgeon on Jul 22, 2016 15:32:11 GMT -5
RAM IS MAR
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2016 15:34:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jul 22, 2016 15:35:39 GMT -5
The first RAW logo was the best
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2016 15:36:39 GMT -5
oof, gradients are so 1999. why not throw some explosion.gifs in there while you're at it.
|
|
|
Post by edgestar on Jul 22, 2016 15:37:06 GMT -5
They couldn't dodge that
|
|
|
Post by Ecks Ecks Ringout Ecks Ecks on Jul 22, 2016 15:37:38 GMT -5
Neither one is enough of a change, in my opinion. They've been tweaking the same aesthetic for Raw since 1993, and Smackdown since 1999. I'm sure they want to maintain at-a-glance brand recognition for the casual viewer and all that, but can't they go a little further for the sake of keeping things fresh?
I feel like we're long overdue for a Prime Time Wrestling > Raw style overhaul. Red Show, Blue Show feels done to death.
|
|
|
Post by Friday Night SmackOwn on Jul 22, 2016 15:40:12 GMT -5
The Smackdown logo is a little too similar to the Impact logo, IMO. RAW isn't bad but I wouldn't say it is good either, the "W" just looks weird. Impact logo for those that don't know I think it's the blue line from the "D" and the italicized name text that brings to mind Impact Wrestling.
|
|