Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2016 15:16:26 GMT -5
What is the appeal of another Lesnar/Goldberg match? Goldberg just beat the guy in 90 seconds. Why on earth should anyone care or expect something decent? Am I missing something? Regarding Raw's title scene, there is literally no decent top match they can build to. As far as Rollins/HHH goes, again, what does it matter? Beating HHH doesn't mean much at this point. Even coming out of WM next year, what is Raw's plan? I see nothing. It is alarming that Styles has nothing going on for WM. It's not like he hasn't basically carried the SD brand since the split, or been the best wrestler in the company for 2016. Wouldn't want to have a major WM match for him, no sir. Because we never got that epic two jacked up hosses beating each other to a pulp match that we were promised 13 years ago. The first one both guys decided to phone it more than the biggest slacker working his last day in a job he hates and the second one was 90 seconds. Those matches don't even feel like matches it just feels like glorious in ring segments to close a Raw. Haha you're getting like me where you're getting pissed about random shit supersweet. Before long you're going to have that just for men haircut going along with a shaved moustache you can't hide like me. That's you man! You're gettin old!
|
|
Rican
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
July 17, 2011 - HHHe called it
Posts: 16,460
|
Post by Rican on Dec 29, 2016 15:23:00 GMT -5
Undertaker - "And SmackDown has always been my home!" *goes to Raw to feud with Reigns for no reason* What pisses me off is that the 2 guys who have been killing it this year, Ambrose and Styles, don't have any major plans it seems. They've been the workhorses of this company for 2016, they've been doing the most and then this shit happens. Sad. I hate when they do that. The people who have had the best years deserve high profile matches.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2016 15:24:53 GMT -5
Because we never got that epic two jacked up hosses beating each other to a pulp match that we were promised 13 years ago. The first one both guys decided to phone it more than the biggest slacker working his last day in a job he hates and the second one was 90 seconds. Those matches don't even feel like matches it just feels like glorious in ring segments to close a Raw. Haha you're getting like me where you're getting pissed about random shit supersweet. Before long you're going to have that just for men haircut going along with a shaved moustache you can't hide like me. That's you man! You're gettin old! You honestly couldn't have timed that message more perfectly with the way how my week and day has been going. Like I had to work extra days on my days off with less then 12 hours notice which means I had to cancel many appointments and reschedule them next week and the one I was pissed off the most was delaying my haircut especially on how long my sides are getting making my grays more noticeable! f*** this has to be sign.
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Dec 29, 2016 15:32:33 GMT -5
Like seriously, why the hell is Big Show Vs Shaq even happening?! Does anyone seriously want to see this?! Is Vince so determined to have this match that he has to announce it a year in advance?! Because Shaq is wiling to do it, and Wrestlemania is the greatest concentration of Vince McMahon's craving for media attention and whatever narrow idea of "legitimacy" he believes is brought by having real stars show up on his wrestling show. Shaq is still a huge sports name, and the last time he had a name that big involved in his show was Lawrence Taylor over 20 years ago. Shaq's willing to get in the ring, which means there's no way Vince won't go all out.
|
|
|
Post by Fade is a CodyCryBaby on Dec 29, 2016 15:38:44 GMT -5
I can hear it now..."This ain't your yard anymore, it's The Big Dogs!!"
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 29, 2016 15:41:41 GMT -5
Like seriously, why the hell is Big Show Vs Shaq even happening?! Does anyone seriously want to see this?! Is Vince so determined to have this match that he has to announce it a year in advance?! Because Shaq is wiling to do it, and Wrestlemania is the greatest concentration of Vince McMahon's craving for media attention and whatever narrow idea of "legitimacy" he believes is brought by having real stars show up on his wrestling show. Shaq is still a huge sports name, and the last time he had a name that big involved in his show was Lawrence Taylor over 20 years ago. Shaq's willing to get in the ring, which means there's no way Vince won't go all out. You could make an argument for Floyd Mayweather since he was at arguably his peak when WWE brought him in but yeah, Shaq is a pretty huge "get" for WWE. The fact that he showed up at Mania this year and was in the Battle Royal was easily the most shocking thing on the show.
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
Celestial Princess in Exile.
Posts: 46,055
Member is Online
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Dec 29, 2016 15:42:56 GMT -5
Like seriously, why the hell is Big Show Vs Shaq even happening?! Does anyone seriously want to see this?! Is Vince so determined to have this match that he has to announce it a year in advance?! Because Shaq is wiling to do it, and Wrestlemania is the greatest concentration of Vince McMahon's craving for media attention and whatever narrow idea of "legitimacy" he believes is brought by having real stars show up on his wrestling show. Shaq is still a huge sports name, and the last time he had a name that big involved in his show was Lawrence Taylor over 20 years ago. Shaq's willing to get in the ring, which means there's no way Vince won't go all out. I really hope Shaq gets himself in some shape other than "Rikishi in TNA" since he's committed to this match.
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
Celestial Princess in Exile.
Posts: 46,055
Member is Online
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Dec 29, 2016 15:44:04 GMT -5
Because Shaq is wiling to do it, and Wrestlemania is the greatest concentration of Vince McMahon's craving for media attention and whatever narrow idea of "legitimacy" he believes is brought by having real stars show up on his wrestling show. Shaq is still a huge sports name, and the last time he had a name that big involved in his show was Lawrence Taylor over 20 years ago. Shaq's willing to get in the ring, which means there's no way Vince won't go all out. You could make an argument for Floyd Mayweather since he was at arguably his peak when WWE brought him in but yeah, Shaq is a pretty huge "get" for WWE. The fact that he showed up at Mania this year and was in the Battle Royal was easily the most shocking thing on the show. And this is something Shaq has seemed to have wanted for a long time to begin with. I remember there being a segment of him whacking Carlito with a steel chair backstage some years ago...
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Dec 29, 2016 15:56:35 GMT -5
Because Shaq is wiling to do it, and Wrestlemania is the greatest concentration of Vince McMahon's craving for media attention and whatever narrow idea of "legitimacy" he believes is brought by having real stars show up on his wrestling show. Shaq is still a huge sports name, and the last time he had a name that big involved in his show was Lawrence Taylor over 20 years ago. Shaq's willing to get in the ring, which means there's no way Vince won't go all out. You could make an argument for Floyd Mayweather since he was at arguably his peak when WWE brought him in but yeah, Shaq is a pretty huge "get" for WWE. The fact that he showed up at Mania this year and was in the Battle Royal was easily the most shocking thing on the show. Admittedly I'd forgotten about Mayweather completely, but I'd argue that the get of one of the biggest name value stars in one of what I'd imagine is generally a bigger sport in today's time, would have biggest sicne Lawrence Taylor" hold up, at least.
|
|
|
Post by Fade is a CodyCryBaby on Dec 29, 2016 16:05:34 GMT -5
Shaqs still a pretty big deal. Not only that but the prospect of those two Giants going at it will garner attention. And it'll be a glorious hot f***ing mess.
|
|
Gus Richlen Was Wrong
Patti Mayonnaise
Metal Maestro: Co-winner of the FAN Idol Throwdown!
Fun while it lasted
Posts: 38,450
|
Post by Gus Richlen Was Wrong on Dec 29, 2016 16:09:29 GMT -5
Reigns isn't facing Undertaker, as much as I'd love to see that and for Reigns to win it. He's likely getting Nakamura or Joe (unless they're overly eager to rush Strowman to the top, in which case Reigns loses the US Championship to Braun instead), Owens and Balor will face off for the Universal title, World Champ Styles will probably go over Ambrose for the umpteenth time, and *sigh* we'll get Taker vs. Cena, which I have never had any interest in seeing.
|
|
santmare12
Trap-Jaw
Why? Et tu, Jericho?
Posts: 453
|
Post by santmare12 on Dec 29, 2016 16:10:46 GMT -5
He's in the title match. Better chance of him winning that. That's right, I don't know what I was thinking. I guess I've tried to block the Owens/Reigns feud out of my mind. Lets just hope they don't pull a Ziggler and have him in the Rumble after losing the title match. I hate double duty at the Rumble.
|
|
Phil Parent
El Dandy
Your Favourite Teacher
Posts: 8,508
|
Post by Phil Parent on Dec 29, 2016 16:11:18 GMT -5
I have no problem with Shaq at WrestleMania. The match is a non-factor in the great scheme of things, it's not like he's wrestling for the world title.
|
|
|
Post by One-Armed Drummer of Defrebel on Dec 29, 2016 16:12:59 GMT -5
Wrestlemania's tentative plans have sounded consistently lame for the last 3 or so years, so I'm not too worried about it because of this.
|
|
Pushed to the Moon
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Tony Schiavone in Disguise
Working myself into a shoot
Posts: 15,819
|
Post by Pushed to the Moon on Dec 29, 2016 16:32:04 GMT -5
How can they talk about building the future on a card featuring Shaq vs Big Show and Brock vs Golderg? If Cena vs Taker will create the most interest then surely they'll do it. Wrestlemania has become the part timer paradise already.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2016 16:42:21 GMT -5
How can they talk about building the future on a card featuring Shaq vs Big Show and Brock vs Golderg? If Cena vs Taker will create the most interest then surely they'll do it. Wrestlemania has become the part timer paradise already. Are you implying 2016 shouldn't be headed up by shaq, big show, brock, and goldberg? Surely you are not!
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,745
|
Post by Dub H on Dec 29, 2016 16:44:02 GMT -5
Yeh,i will probably just skip this WM like I skipped most of last. It is like from the end of the Rumble to the end of WM,it is just non stop disappointment
|
|
|
Post by Mid-Carder on Dec 29, 2016 16:53:49 GMT -5
If AJ Styles isn't in the last match, I won't be watching any of it. There's literally no excuse for him not to main event.
|
|
|
Post by Fade is a CodyCryBaby on Dec 29, 2016 16:57:26 GMT -5
If AJ Styles isn't in the last match, I won't be watching any of it. There's literally no excuse for him not to main event. If it's Taker/Cena, I get it. That's a huge match. But regardless AJ should have a top billed match and not relegated to some multi-man ladder match.
|
|
|
Post by Mid-Carder on Dec 29, 2016 17:38:30 GMT -5
If AJ Styles isn't in the last match, I won't be watching any of it. There's literally no excuse for him not to main event. If it's Taker/Cena, I get it. That's a huge match. But regardless AJ should have a top billed match and not relegated to some multi-man ladder match. No doubt, but Taker and Cena have had their chance to main event Mania. It's AJ's time. There's no reason they should get top billing ahead of him.
|
|