Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 244,481
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Jan 29, 2017 22:45:17 GMT -5
Three Years of this shit, THREE YEARS. And he's still getting Stadium Wide Boos and outright rejection. This Rumble was the cherry on top of the cherry on top of the cheery they keep putting on top of this F***ing Push. He was booed in the Shark Cage Match, Braun got CHEERED when he beat him down.
THEN, they expect him being 30th in the Rumble to go over, not only that, ELIMINATING TAKER, THEY EXPECTED THAT TO GO OVER.
What they got was Multiple "This is Bullshit" chants, arena wide.
Roman Reigns ruined the Rumble, for basically the third straight year. Vince, F*** you, or F*** whoever keeps deciding this is working, it's not working, whoever thinks so, is f***ing DEAF.
F*** this Roman Reigns booking, everything about it, three years strong.
|
|
|
Post by The Legend of Groose on Jan 29, 2017 22:47:36 GMT -5
But he's THE GUY!
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 29, 2017 22:48:45 GMT -5
He didn't even win. And I'm pretty sure they wanted him getting booed against Undertaker.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 22:49:14 GMT -5
Roman's been in four Rumbles. He's won one, been third once, and been the runner-up twice. That is insane.
|
|
|
Post by Andy Martin on Jan 29, 2017 22:49:31 GMT -5
I mean, he was acting pretty heel-ish in there. Commentary mentioned it as well.
|
|
Knailsic From Now On
Dennis Stamp
Loneliest Number Since #1
Waiting with my red eyes and my stone heart
Posts: 4,365
|
Post by Knailsic From Now On on Jan 29, 2017 22:49:51 GMT -5
I like Roman and even I felt tonight was way too much.
|
|
|
Post by DoubleDare on Jan 29, 2017 22:50:17 GMT -5
You'd think they would've learned from 2 years ago when I went to the rumble. He is such a sour note.
|
|
|
Post by xCompackx on Jan 29, 2017 22:51:59 GMT -5
I have to believe that if Roman vs. Undertaker is happening, Roman is turning heel. Like, there's no other way it can happen. The fans won't let it be face vs. face. It was hardly face vs. face when they did Brock vs. Undertaker at SummerSlam. Roman's going to be heel in this scenario.
|
|
|
Post by Ishmeal Loves BBL Bayley on Jan 29, 2017 22:52:15 GMT -5
I think tonight they actually got the reaction they were going for. No, it doesn't make sense for "the guy" and the next face of the company, but they wanted that reaction against Taker, and they know whoever eliminated him was getting cheered. The Wyatts have been tweeners for a while now, so it makes sense in that sense.
|
|
Shai
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,507
|
Post by Shai on Jan 29, 2017 22:52:26 GMT -5
I'm f***ing speechless. I can't even.
That really just happened?!
|
|
|
Post by Big Bad Kahuna on Jan 29, 2017 22:52:28 GMT -5
If Vince was smart, he'd let Roman take a LONG timeout after WM33
|
|
Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 244,481
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Jan 29, 2017 22:52:37 GMT -5
I mean, he was acting pretty heel-ish in there. Commentary mentioned it as well. I'll Believe That when I see it on RAW... Cause I don't see it happening.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 22:52:46 GMT -5
I mean, he was acting pretty heel-ish in there. Commentary mentioned it as well. If the intention was to turn him heel, wouldn't it have made more FAR sense for Taker to eliminate Reigns then Reigns throws a fit over it and lays him out when he looks to be ready to take out the Wyatts and win?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 22:52:50 GMT -5
You'd think having him go over Bryan was a big thing. Taker is a damn legend that all casuals love. This is something entirely different. We're not getting Cena/Taker at all. We're getting Reigns/Taker.
Think about it.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 48,450
|
Post by Dub H on Jan 29, 2017 22:54:05 GMT -5
You'd think having him go over Bryan was a big thing. Taker is a damn legend that all casuals love. This is something entirely different. We're not getting Cena/Taker at all. We're getting Reigns/Taker. Think about it. Well.Bryan is also a damn legend that all casuals love. But enough being pedantic ,i get what you are saying
|
|
Gus Richlen: Ruffian
Patti Mayonnaise
Metal Maestro: Co-winner of the FAN Idol Throwdown!
BAU BAU
Posts: 39,125
|
Post by Gus Richlen: Ruffian on Jan 29, 2017 22:58:36 GMT -5
I had read quite a bit elsewhere that Reigns was supposed to turn some point late last year but Balor's injury screwed that plan up. My guess is they decided not to wait.
I will be going to Fastlane so maybe he faces Strowman, acts quite a bit more heelish in the build, Undertaker cost him the match, and Reigns wallops him afterwards. BOOM. Heel turn sealed.
|
|
|
Post by Session Moth is over on Jan 29, 2017 23:00:56 GMT -5
He was only in the Rumble so people would cheer an Orton win.
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jan 29, 2017 23:02:01 GMT -5
If they're determined to have him vs Taker, it works for what it is.
Why that's some sort of make believe dream match I don't know.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 23:02:06 GMT -5
I dunno I don't think you can call WWE out for making a mistake when it seems like the reason Reigns was there in the first place was this reaction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 23:02:35 GMT -5
He was only in the Rumble so people would cheer an Orton win. Probably would've anyway, particularly if he did it by tossing Bray. Orton's been getting cheered huge any time he's looked to be turning on him and is popular with crowds anyway despite his shaky Internet reception.
|
|