Eunös ✈
Dalek
Duck Feet Expert
Tolerated, just not practically liked.
Posts: 59,315
|
Post by Eunös ✈ on Jan 12, 2018 17:10:10 GMT -5
It's funny how WWE likes to make a big deal that being the Number 1 entry into a Royal Rumble is the worst thing possible and if you want to win it you got a long night ahead of you. Yet being entry Number 2 isn't quite as big a deal despite the fact you have to go the same distance. They always waffle on every year about how Shawn Michaels once won it from 1, and that other before he did his thing. Yet they don't really mention Mysterio winning it from 2 or I guess Mcmahon (Even if he did spend most of the match away from the ring) The only difference between these 2 numbers is the order you are introduced to the ring. Personally I think drawing out 2 is worse than 1.. I mean think about it, You could get jumped on as soon as you enter making you easy pickings. 4 Times in Royal Rumble history, entry 2 has been eliminated 4 times before Entry 3 has come out. Don't get me wrong Being Entry 1 has it's dangers.. Like in 2003 when Jericho came out only for it to be Christian, and Jericho attacked HBK from the other side.. and what is to stop Entry 2 running down and taking out Entry 1 as they are heading to the ring?.. Unless it's 2008 and you get disqualified Either way Dolph Ziggler clearly agrees that Entry 1 is the safer option as he chose that over being Entry 2 back in 2013.. So do you think being entry 2 is slightly more of a disadvantage than being Entry 1 or not.. Or perhaps both are equally as a disadvantage as each other. Do share
|
|
|
Post by CeilingFan on Jan 12, 2018 17:18:44 GMT -5
in Kayfabe, it is the psychological factor. You have entered the ring and 29 other superstars are coming after you.
|
|
Shark
Hank Scorpio
The world's only Samurai Ninja Pirate
Posts: 7,045
|
Post by Shark on Jan 12, 2018 22:26:03 GMT -5
When Rey was with the company, they'd almost always mention that he won from #2 and that the same number of people have won from the starting 2 positions. So they have before.
|
|
rrg251
Don Corleone
Posts: 2,051
|
Post by rrg251 on Jan 13, 2018 0:07:24 GMT -5
This brings me to a suggestion I've had for several years: Why not just have two #1 positions? They're going to be tied at 00:00 for the time they enter the match, so why have the thankless #2 position at all?
|
|
|
Post by darthobiwan on Jan 13, 2018 0:08:47 GMT -5
I think usually 2 goes out before 1 in rumbles, and about half of them 2 was the first one eliminated too.
|
|
Cranjis McBasketball
Crow T. Robot
Knew what the hell that thing was supposed to be
It's Just a Ride
Posts: 42,477
|
Post by Cranjis McBasketball on Jan 13, 2018 0:16:09 GMT -5
This brings me to a suggestion I've had for several years: Why not just have two #1 positions? They're going to be tied at 00:00 for the time they enter the match, so why have the thankless #2 position at all? Because one is not big enough to hold two. That’s why two was invented.
|
|
|
Post by xCompackx on Jan 13, 2018 0:32:40 GMT -5
I mean, I could see how the earlier entrants could be easier targets from exerting energy trying to avoid eliminations, fighting off other entrants, and the exhaustion of just being in a match for how ever long they're in for, but I'd think once you get past, say, 10 entrants, numbers 1 and 2 would probably be safer than later ones. Sure, you could eliminate Jobber McJobberson as he's trying to recover his stamina, but your focus should probably be more on 3-10, plus the others coming later as they're more likely to try and eliminate you.
On the flip side, I wouldn't consider #30 to be all that great, outside of kayfabe. Yeah, you're as fresh as you're going to be, but you're also completely at the mercy of everyone else's efforts in terms of how many people are left in the ring and the one guy they'd probably want to target is the guy well-rested enough to start throwing out people.
Sorry, I like these kinds of topics, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Final Countdown Jones on Jan 13, 2018 1:30:14 GMT -5
This brings me to a suggestion I've had for several years: Why not just have two #1 positions? They're going to be tied at 00:00 for the time they enter the match, so why have the thankless #2 position at all? Because that's how numbers are?
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Jan 13, 2018 5:36:22 GMT -5
Two is at a disadvantage since number 1 is already in the ring and can get the jump on the guy when hes coming in...
|
|
mrbananagrabber
King Koopa
Paul Heyman's unofficial joke writer
Posts: 11,893
|
Post by mrbananagrabber on Jan 13, 2018 10:27:36 GMT -5
My biggest pet peeve with the Rumble and the promo after it, “I went through 29 other men..”
No, you didn’t, unless you came in at the start, you didn’t.
Gaaah.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Jan 13, 2018 11:18:00 GMT -5
Two is at a disadvantage since number 1 is already in the ring and can get the jump on the guy when hes coming in... also at #2 you know who #1 is. when you pull #1 in theory you don't know who is coming out next until their music plays.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 12:16:02 GMT -5
If you asked me 5 years ago, I'd argue #3 was the worst spot. Yeah, Ric Flair won from that entry, but often, that would be a jobber or a guy quickly eliminated.
But, #2 seems to always get eliminated by #1 these days.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 12:17:43 GMT -5
My biggest pet peeve with the Rumble and the promo after it, “I went through 29 other men..” No, you didn’t, unless you came in at the start, you didn’t. Gaaah. Here's another. When Kane beat up Carlito heading up to the 2006 Rumble, he said that was his first victim, and there's 29 more left. Basic math means he wants to eliminate 30 people.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Jan 13, 2018 12:21:52 GMT -5
My biggest pet peeve with the Rumble and the promo after it, “I went through 29 other men..” No, you didn’t, unless you came in at the start, you didn’t. Gaaah. Here's another. When Kane beat up Carlito heading up to the 2006 Rumble, he said that was his first victim, and there's 29 more left. Basic math means he wants to eliminate 30 people. It was good enough for Macho Man!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 12:23:52 GMT -5
Here's another. When Kane beat up Carlito heading up to the 2006 Rumble, he said that was his first victim, and there's 29 more left. Basic math means he wants to eliminate 30 people. It was good enough for Macho Man! To be fair, logic often escaped Macho Man at the Rumble. Who will forget he was the first no-show, or how he accidentally eliminated himself, or most famously, that pinfall attempt?
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Jan 13, 2018 12:50:11 GMT -5
I say have #1 enter by themselves, and then make them spend the first two minutes doing Hindu squats and jumping jacks until #2 enters.
|
|
segaz
Samurai Cop
Posts: 2,381
|
Post by segaz on Jan 13, 2018 13:04:40 GMT -5
This brings me to a suggestion I've had for several years: Why not just have two #1 positions? They're going to be tied at 00:00 for the time they enter the match, so why have the thankless #2 position at all? They should just call the first two "co starters" and make call the next entrant the 3rd entrant.
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Jan 13, 2018 16:36:37 GMT -5
See I always wanted a comedy guy like Santino to fall out of the ring as number 1 before number 2 came out and was eliminated that way
|
|
|
Post by karl100589 on Jan 13, 2018 16:41:14 GMT -5
I mean, I could see how the earlier entrants could be easier targets from exerting energy trying to avoid eliminations, fighting off other entrants, and the exhaustion of just being in a match for how ever long they're in for, but I'd think once you get past, say, 10 entrants, numbers 1 and 2 would probably be safer than later ones. Sure, you could eliminate Jobber McJobberson as he's trying to recover his stamina, but your focus should probably be more on 3-10, plus the others coming later as they're more likely to try and eliminate you. On the flip side, I wouldn't consider #30 to be all that great, outside of kayfabe. Yeah, you're as fresh as you're going to be, but you're also completely at the mercy of everyone else's efforts in terms of how many people are left in the ring and the one guy they'd probably want to target is the guy well-rested enough to start throwing out people. Sorry, I like these kinds of topics, lol. It's the same reason I hate the commentary team hyping up monster heels ala Big Show. If you're the biggest and tallest man in the match the likelyhood of everyone teaming up to get you out increases.
|
|
|
Post by Nic Nemeth on Jan 14, 2018 5:11:23 GMT -5
#1 doesn't know who #2 is but #2 knows who #1 is. You're already prepared to face them when you head to the ring, even if they try to sneak attack you, you know the refs will try to separate you until the bell rings so you can prepare for that as well.
|
|