Who needed a win from Triple H the most?

[The Rick Jericho]

The timeline says it all as there were questionable victories for Triple H at times.

But which one victory over Triple H was needed most in your mind?

[Mister Pigwell]

Sting and Booker are 1A and 1B for me here.

[The Rick Jericho]

Jun 27, 2018 19:50:17 GMT -5 Mister Pigwell said:

Sting and Booker are 1A and 1B for me here.

That's a tough one.

I was thinking either Goldberg at Summerslam 2003, the WWE was finally ready for him.

Or Night of Champions 11, because that cause SO MUCH long term WWE damage to the Punk character.

[Facetious]

While Lesnar worked out in the end, he definitely didn't need to lose to Triple H at Mania. And maybe there was more to the backstage Jeff Hardy 08-09 run, but I feel like a win of him could have been huge but they skipped around that.

[Clutchhausen]

It will always be WM 19. Always.

[Deleted]

Jun 27, 2018 19:52:46 GMT -5 Facetious said:

While Lesnar worked out in the end, he definitely didn't need to lose to Triple H at Mania. And maybe there was more to the backstage Jeff Hardy 08-09 run, but I feel like a win of him could have been huge but they skipped around that.

I don't understand it. If Triple H wanted to prove he was above Lesnar's level, he should have gone in MMA and won a heavyweight belt.

[toodarkmark]

Booker T needed it, Sting would have just brought people some joy.

[Hypnosis]

Booker, no doubt.

[atgnatpodcast]

Jun 27, 2018 20:51:34 GMT -5 toodarkmark said:

Booker T needed it, Sting would have just brought people some joy.

I was struggling with the decision until I read this, great point

[Slingshot Suplay]

1. Booker t
2. Sting
3. Punk

[Deleted]

Booker easily.

[bob]

when Trips played the race card, the least he should've put over Booker T

[Deleted]

The answer is always Booker T.

[corndog]

Booker T needed it and the booking(no pun intended)even made it necessary. Punk and Sting didn't need the wins, but they definitely should have won.

[Bub (BLM)]

Jesus, where's the "All" option? I knew it was bad, but seeing it all in a row like that... yeesh.

["Magic" Mark Hurr]

Jun 27, 2018 22:05:21 GMT -5 Bub (BLM) said:

Jesus, where's the "All" option? I knew it was bad, but seeing it all in a row like that... yeesh.

I jokingly said all of them to myself before I opened the thread.

[Deleted]

Rock should have won at WM 16 (I still haven’t watched that match because it pisses me off that they deliberately held off for a month later), but Rock didn’t lose anything by it.

Goldberg at Summerslam, Booker at WM, and Sting at WM were definitely the top answers to this question.

Hmm, I sense a theme with those three.

[The Legend of Groose]

Booker T and Sting. Both with the same problem of there was literally NO reason for Triple H to win clean.

[mauled]

Booker T no question. Once racism came into play that was the only way to go.

[The Dark Order Inferno]

Booker T, that was the only way it should have gone once they made Triple H the racist heel.

Honourable mention for Sting. Punk would have benefited more from not being in a feud with Triple H at all.