Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2019 15:30:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jun 19, 2019 15:33:58 GMT -5
Make Shane the champion.
Maybe that will help.
|
|
dbrussel
Don Corleone
Former WOW employee
Posts: 1,793
|
Post by dbrussel on Jun 19, 2019 15:50:52 GMT -5
Real Housewives of Beverly Hills won the night. Wow
It's time to make Shane the champ. Who cares anymore. Let's try that experiment.
I just wanna see the world burn.
|
|
mrbananagrabber
King Koopa
Paul Heyman's unofficial joke writer
Posts: 11,783
|
Post by mrbananagrabber on Jun 19, 2019 16:15:31 GMT -5
I can’t believe people aren’t invested and tuning in to see Dolph vs Kofi.
|
|
|
Post by Fade is a CodyCryBaby on Jun 19, 2019 16:18:29 GMT -5
Last night around midnight, at some point I went “oh shit Smackdown was on today”
|
|
|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Jun 19, 2019 16:33:38 GMT -5
Things definitely happen on Smackdown but it's become more of the secondary show that builds on RAW rather than its own show. I mean, a lot of the storylines built on Tuesday built off of Monday's show.
|
|
|
Post by TWERKIN' MAGGLE on Jun 19, 2019 17:04:26 GMT -5
Somehow this is Finn Balor’s fault. I don’t know how, but it is.
We need more BEEF!
|
|
|
Post by cabbageboy on Jun 19, 2019 17:04:28 GMT -5
Making SD this secondary jobber show is a horrible idea going into the Fox deal. The irony is that Fox wants various star names but the problem is that in putting star names from Raw on SD it basically makes SD this nothing 2 hours of filler rather than its own entity.
|
|
|
Post by theironyuppie on Jun 19, 2019 20:38:42 GMT -5
Who would have thought an episode with a combined 50 minutes of Dolph/Shane and no Roman/Charlotte/Finn would rate poorly?
|
|
Facetious
King Koopa
ADAM COLE BAYBAY
Posts: 11,542
|
Post by Facetious on Jun 19, 2019 21:00:02 GMT -5
Making SD this secondary jobber show is a horrible idea going into the Fox deal. The irony is that Fox wants various star names but the problem is that in putting star names from Raw on SD it basically makes SD this nothing 2 hours of filler rather than its own entity. The same thing happened years ago when they had SD stars on Raw all the time right before they ended the split. If you're a casual fan, why watch SD when Raw gets those stars PLUS it's own?
|
|
|
Post by Surfer Sandman on Jun 19, 2019 21:04:28 GMT -5
I turned it off half-way through.
I do not want to see an extension of the terrible, third-rate RAW.
|
|
|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Jun 20, 2019 9:21:09 GMT -5
From WOR, the actual rating it did (1.27) was the second lowest live Smackdown in history behind the one on Christmas Day.
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Jun 20, 2019 9:26:45 GMT -5
From WOR, the actual rating it did (1.27) was the second lowest live Smackdown in history behind the one on Christmas Day. Fox:
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Jun 20, 2019 10:09:19 GMT -5
From WOR, the actual rating it did (1.27) was the second lowest live Smackdown in history behind the one on Christmas Day. And this is a really, really important note I'm gonna harp home every ratings thread I can. Not only are ratings down in a raw numbers sense, but the share WWE gets of the ratings total has gone down with it, and cord cutting might change what 100% expresses but it doesn't change things being out of 100%. WWE has been falling out of favour faster than television has and it's because the product has driven people off.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,745
|
Post by Dub H on Jun 20, 2019 10:23:56 GMT -5
remember when smackdown live 2016 pulled about 3.000 viewers?
|
|
|
Post by YAKMAN is ICHIBAN on Jun 20, 2019 10:57:04 GMT -5
From WOR, the actual rating it did (1.27) was the second lowest live Smackdown in history behind the one on Christmas Day. Fox: It really makes you wonder what performance metrics are included in the FOX deal.
|
|