Tammy Sytch Pleads No Contest to DWI Manslaughter P39

[mistery]

Yeah its also worth pointing out that at no point has she shown any remorse for killing this man. So if she is convicted (and that seems incredibly likely), she will be looking at a very lengthy sentence. I don't see her taking a plea deal either since she legitimately thinks she did nothing wrong.

[FHgrad99]

Her being remanded is smart because she won't be able to get into more trouble than she already is. Since this latest incident, she has shown no signs of taking responsibility for her actions or any remorse for her actions. Her being in jail is probably safest for everybody.

[sdoyle7798]

May 13, 2022 11:03:30 GMT -5 FHgrad99 said:

Her being remanded is smart because she won't be able to get into more trouble than she already is. Since this latest incident, she has shown no signs of taking responsibility for her actions or any remorse for her actions. Her being in jail is probably safest for everybody.

And I'm willing to bether attorney put up zero objections, as she was only hurting her case with her actions.

[Deleted]

May 11, 2022 20:15:02 GMT -5 Push R Truth said:

May 11, 2022 20:13:16 GMT -5 Alice Syndrome said:

Did they have to do a blood alcohol test, or did they just take that video file and run a breathalyser on that?

Breathalyzer probably was beeping "over the limit" while the cop was still 15 feet away

[Kevin Hamilton]

Throw away the key so she can't kill again. She's had something like 12 chances. That's enough.

[Clutchhausen]

May 13, 2022 11:48:37 GMT -5 @jdogindy said:

May 11, 2022 20:15:02 GMT -5 Push R Truth said:

Breathalyzer probably was beeping "over the limit" while the cop was still 15 feet away

I just heard the horn that plays in this scene.

[Natural Born Farmer]

Volusia County jail seeing a lot of Sunny days lately

[fortknox]

[Glitch]

Not gonna lie, it really pisses me seeing those court images of her acting as if this is some minor inconvenience at a grocery store. F*** you tammy. I hope she spends her last elderly days behind bars.

[jason1980s]

I wonder if the court system ever saw someone who is totally indefensible? Like, no paid defense lawyer or public defender would ever work with this person-they turned down the job. I would imagine she is very close to being that one person.

[zrowsdower]

May 13, 2022 17:25:29 GMT -5 jason1980s said:

I wonder if the court system ever saw someone who is totally indefensible? Like, no paid defense lawyer or public defender would ever work with this person-they turned down the job. I would imagine she is very close to being that one person.

She'll be the first person to be blackballed by the court system. Knowing her, she'll probably brag about it though.

[mistery]

May 13, 2022 17:25:29 GMT -5 jason1980s said:

I wonder if the court system ever saw someone who is totally indefensible? Like, no paid defense lawyer or public defender would ever work with this person-they turned down the job. I would imagine she is very close to being that one person.

The state has to provide her with a lawyer. Public defenders can choose whether they want to defend the person or not. However, they are legally obligated to defend the person to the best of their ability if they do take on the case.

With that being said though, her public statements she's made since the incident will just make her lawyer's life even harder. The best case scenario right now for her is pleading guilty and hoping for a slightly lighter sentence. But as it stands, she's looking at 26 years in the clink.

[MiLB Fan]

May 13, 2022 17:25:29 GMT -5 jason1980s said:

I wonder if the court system ever saw someone who is totally indefensible? Like, no paid defense lawyer or public defender would ever work with this person-they turned down the job. I would imagine she is very close to being that one person.

PWInsider says that according to court records she did have a public defender, but hired her own attorney.

Which leads me to the question that I’m sure everyone will ask: how the hell can she afford an attorney? I’ll assume her boyfriend is footing the bill, although he’ll soon need one himself for the civil lawsuit initiated by the Lasseter estate.

[Ringmaster]

ORDER GRANTING STATE'S MOTION FOR PRE-TRIAL DETENTION

THIS CAUSE having come upon the State's motion to detain the Defendant on May 13, 2022, and the Court having conducted a hearing, taken testimony, accepting exhibits, and the Court otherwise being fully apprised in this matter, this Court hereby finds as follows:

Pursuant to Section 907.041(4)(c)4, Florida Statutes, this Court finds there-is a substantial probability, based on the Defendant's past and present patterns of behavior and other relevant facts, that the Defendant poses a threat of harm to the community.

1. The Defendant is charged with DUI Causing Death of a Human/Unborn Child (DUI Manslaughter), a "dangerous crime" under Florida Statute 907.041(4)(a)(10). Accordingly, this Court finds the Defendant is charged with a dangerous crime.

2. The Court finds from the testimony presented and the documents entered into evidence that there is a substantial probability that the Defendant committed the crime of DUI Manslaughter.

a. The Court heard the testimony of two (2) officers from the arresting agency.

b. Defendant was the sole occupant of her vehicle and found in the driver's seat, despite evidence that her driver's license is currently suspended.

c. Defendant's vehicle rear-ended a stopped vehicle (a Kia) so hard that the Kia ran into yet another vehicle.

d. The accident resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia.

e. Defendant had an unsealed bottle of vodka in the passenger floorboard.

f. Defendant made admissions that she had been drinking vodka earlier in the evening.

g. Defendant's blood alcohol was well over the legal limit (at least .28, ranging up to .32 - .36).

h. Defendant's blood also had levels of THC.

i. The crash caused by the Defendant's driving resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia vehicle.

3. The Court finds that the Defendant is a threat to the community and disregarded the safety of the community. The Court took into consideration the factors in 907.041(4)(a)(c)(4)(a)-(c).

The Court finds that the Defendant meets the standards under numerous factors of being a threat to the community.

a. The Court reviewed the Defendant's driving record that was entered into evidence. The Defendant has previous convictions for three (3) separate Driving Under the Influence charges, as well as for Driving While License Suspended, Canceled or Revoked.

b. The Defendant further has charges pending from January of 2022 out of New Jersey, as well as a pending Driving Under the Influence out of New Jersey from February of 2022.

c. Though this offense occurred on March 25, 2022, the Defendant was taken into custody on a Marchman Act in May of 2022, after being found in front of "Robbie O'Connell's" unresponsive.

d. On the date of the incident, the Defendant had no Florida driver's license, and her license from another state was suspended due to previous Driving Under the Influence charges.

4. This Court finds there are no less restrictive conditions of release that can reasonably protect the community. The Court finds that the Defendant has disregarded the law several times previously, and that the Defendant has no intention of abiding by the law or bond conditions based on her past and present conduct.

5. The Court finds it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a need for pretrial detention.

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED the State's Motion for Pretrial Detention is GRANTED and the Defendant is to be held without bond.

DONE AND ORDERED this / day of May 2022, at DAYTONA BEACH IN VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

www.pwinsider.com/article/158890/complete-judges-order-remanding-tammy-sytch-to-jail.html?p=1

[Mighty Attack Tribble]

That's about as open-and-shut a case as it gets. She's toast.

[mistery]

May 13, 2022 19:00:51 GMT -5 MiLB Fan said:

May 13, 2022 17:25:29 GMT -5 jason1980s said:

I wonder if the court system ever saw someone who is totally indefensible? Like, no paid defense lawyer or public defender would ever work with this person-they turned down the job. I would imagine she is very close to being that one person.

PWInsider says that according to court records she did have a public defender, but hired her own attorney.

Which leads me to the question that I’m sure everyone will ask: how the hell can she afford an attorney? I’ll assume her boyfriend is footing the bill, although he’ll soon need one himself for the civil lawsuit initiated by the Lasseter estate.

OnlyFans money bud.

[ChitownKnight]

Say she served like 25 years. Will she be able to get out in half time for good behavior? Because with what she’s shown, she absolutely does NOT deserve it

[fortknox]

[1 Free Moon-Down with Burger]

Demott may have done some bad things but goddamn no one deserves to lose a daughter

[Susan "Poison" Candy]

May 13, 2022 19:17:06 GMT -5 Ringmaster said:

ORDER GRANTING STATE'S MOTION FOR PRE-TRIAL DETENTION

THIS CAUSE having come upon the State's motion to detain the Defendant on May 13, 2022, and the Court having conducted a hearing, taken testimony, accepting exhibits, and the Court otherwise being fully apprised in this matter, this Court hereby finds as follows:

Pursuant to Section 907.041(4)(c)4, Florida Statutes, this Court finds there-is a substantial probability, based on the Defendant's past and present patterns of behavior and other relevant facts, that the Defendant poses a threat of harm to the community.

1. The Defendant is charged with DUI Causing Death of a Human/Unborn Child (DUI Manslaughter), a "dangerous crime" under Florida Statute 907.041(4)(a)(10). Accordingly, this Court finds the Defendant is charged with a dangerous crime.

2. The Court finds from the testimony presented and the documents entered into evidence that there is a substantial probability that the Defendant committed the crime of DUI Manslaughter.

a. The Court heard the testimony of two (2) officers from the arresting agency.

b. Defendant was the sole occupant of her vehicle and found in the driver's seat, despite evidence that her driver's license is currently suspended.

c. Defendant's vehicle rear-ended a stopped vehicle (a Kia) so hard that the Kia ran into yet another vehicle.

d. The accident resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia.

e. Defendant had an unsealed bottle of vodka in the passenger floorboard.

f. Defendant made admissions that she had been drinking vodka earlier in the evening.

g. Defendant's blood alcohol was well over the legal limit (at least .28, ranging up to .32 - .36).

h. Defendant's blood also had levels of THC.

i. The crash caused by the Defendant's driving resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia vehicle.

3. The Court finds that the Defendant is a threat to the community and disregarded the safety of the community. The Court took into consideration the factors in 907.041(4)(a)(c)(4)(a)-(c).

The Court finds that the Defendant meets the standards under numerous factors of being a threat to the community.

a. The Court reviewed the Defendant's driving record that was entered into evidence. The Defendant has previous convictions for three (3) separate Driving Under the Influence charges, as well as for Driving While License Suspended, Canceled or Revoked.

b. The Defendant further has charges pending from January of 2022 out of New Jersey, as well as a pending Driving Under the Influence out of New Jersey from February of 2022.

c. Though this offense occurred on March 25, 2022, the Defendant was taken into custody on a Marchman Act in May of 2022, after being found in front of "Robbie O'Connell's" unresponsive.

d. On the date of the incident, the Defendant had no Florida driver's license, and her license from another state was suspended due to previous Driving Under the Influence charges.

4. This Court finds there are no less restrictive conditions of release that can reasonably protect the community. The Court finds that the Defendant has disregarded the law several times previously, and that the Defendant has no intention of abiding by the law or bond conditions based on her past and present conduct.

5. The Court finds it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a need for pretrial detention.

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED the State's Motion for Pretrial Detention is GRANTED and the Defendant is to be held without bond.

DONE AND ORDERED this / day of May 2022, at DAYTONA BEACH IN VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

www.pwinsider.com/article/158890/complete-judges-order-remanding-tammy-sytch-to-jail.html?p=1