Tammy Sytch Pleads No Contest to DWI Manslaughter P39

[FHgrad99]

May 13, 2022 19:17:06 GMT -5 Ringmaster said:

ORDER GRANTING STATE'S MOTION FOR PRE-TRIAL DETENTION

THIS CAUSE having come upon the State's motion to detain the Defendant on May 13, 2022, and the Court having conducted a hearing, taken testimony, accepting exhibits, and the Court otherwise being fully apprised in this matter, this Court hereby finds as follows:

Pursuant to Section 907.041(4)(c)4, Florida Statutes, this Court finds there-is a substantial probability, based on the Defendant's past and present patterns of behavior and other relevant facts, that the Defendant poses a threat of harm to the community.

1. The Defendant is charged with DUI Causing Death of a Human/Unborn Child (DUI Manslaughter), a "dangerous crime" under Florida Statute 907.041(4)(a)(10). Accordingly, this Court finds the Defendant is charged with a dangerous crime.

2. The Court finds from the testimony presented and the documents entered into evidence that there is a substantial probability that the Defendant committed the crime of DUI Manslaughter.

a. The Court heard the testimony of two (2) officers from the arresting agency.

b. Defendant was the sole occupant of her vehicle and found in the driver's seat, despite evidence that her driver's license is currently suspended.

c. Defendant's vehicle rear-ended a stopped vehicle (a Kia) so hard that the Kia ran into yet another vehicle.

d. The accident resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia.

e. Defendant had an unsealed bottle of vodka in the passenger floorboard.

f. Defendant made admissions that she had been drinking vodka earlier in the evening.

g. Defendant's blood alcohol was well over the legal limit (at least .28, ranging up to .32 - .36).

h. Defendant's blood also had levels of THC.

i. The crash caused by the Defendant's driving resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia vehicle.

3. The Court finds that the Defendant is a threat to the community and disregarded the safety of the community. The Court took into consideration the factors in 907.041(4)(a)(c)(4)(a)-(c).

The Court finds that the Defendant meets the standards under numerous factors of being a threat to the community.

a. The Court reviewed the Defendant's driving record that was entered into evidence. The Defendant has previous convictions for three (3) separate Driving Under the Influence charges, as well as for Driving While License Suspended, Canceled or Revoked.

b. The Defendant further has charges pending from January of 2022 out of New Jersey, as well as a pending Driving Under the Influence out of New Jersey from February of 2022.

c. Though this offense occurred on March 25, 2022, the Defendant was taken into custody on a Marchman Act in May of 2022, after being found in front of "Robbie O'Connell's" unresponsive.

d. On the date of the incident, the Defendant had no Florida driver's license, and her license from another state was suspended due to previous Driving Under the Influence charges.

4. This Court finds there are no less restrictive conditions of release that can reasonably protect the community. The Court finds that the Defendant has disregarded the law several times previously, and that the Defendant has no intention of abiding by the law or bond conditions based on her past and present conduct.

5. The Court finds it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a need for pretrial detention.

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED the State's Motion for Pretrial Detention is GRANTED and the Defendant is to be held without bond.

DONE AND ORDERED this / day of May 2022, at DAYTONA BEACH IN VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

www.pwinsider.com/article/158890/complete-judges-order-remanding-tammy-sytch-to-jail.html?p=1

[lionheart21]

May 13, 2022 19:17:06 GMT -5 Ringmaster said:

ORDER GRANTING STATE'S MOTION FOR PRE-TRIAL DETENTION

THIS CAUSE having come upon the State's motion to detain the Defendant on May 13, 2022, and the Court having conducted a hearing, taken testimony, accepting exhibits, and the Court otherwise being fully apprised in this matter, this Court hereby finds as follows:

Pursuant to Section 907.041(4)(c)4, Florida Statutes, this Court finds there-is a substantial probability, based on the Defendant's past and present patterns of behavior and other relevant facts, that the Defendant poses a threat of harm to the community.

1. The Defendant is charged with DUI Causing Death of a Human/Unborn Child (DUI Manslaughter), a "dangerous crime" under Florida Statute 907.041(4)(a)(10). Accordingly, this Court finds the Defendant is charged with a dangerous crime.

2. The Court finds from the testimony presented and the documents entered into evidence that there is a substantial probability that the Defendant committed the crime of DUI Manslaughter.

a. The Court heard the testimony of two (2) officers from the arresting agency.

b. Defendant was the sole occupant of her vehicle and found in the driver's seat, despite evidence that her driver's license is currently suspended.

c. Defendant's vehicle rear-ended a stopped vehicle (a Kia) so hard that the Kia ran into yet another vehicle.

d. The accident resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia.

e. Defendant had an unsealed bottle of vodka in the passenger floorboard.

f. Defendant made admissions that she had been drinking vodka earlier in the evening.

g. Defendant's blood alcohol was well over the legal limit (at least .28, ranging up to .32 - .36).

h. Defendant's blood also had levels of THC.

i. The crash caused by the Defendant's driving resulted in the death of an occupant in the Kia vehicle.

3. The Court finds that the Defendant is a threat to the community and disregarded the safety of the community. The Court took into consideration the factors in 907.041(4)(a)(c)(4)(a)-(c).

The Court finds that the Defendant meets the standards under numerous factors of being a threat to the community.

a. The Court reviewed the Defendant's driving record that was entered into evidence. The Defendant has previous convictions for three (3) separate Driving Under the Influence charges, as well as for Driving While License Suspended, Canceled or Revoked.

b. The Defendant further has charges pending from January of 2022 out of New Jersey, as well as a pending Driving Under the Influence out of New Jersey from February of 2022.

c. Though this offense occurred on March 25, 2022, the Defendant was taken into custody on a Marchman Act in May of 2022, after being found in front of "Robbie O'Connell's" unresponsive.

d. On the date of the incident, the Defendant had no Florida driver's license, and her license from another state was suspended due to previous Driving Under the Influence charges.

4. This Court finds there are no less restrictive conditions of release that can reasonably protect the community. The Court finds that the Defendant has disregarded the law several times previously, and that the Defendant has no intention of abiding by the law or bond conditions based on her past and present conduct.

5. The Court finds it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a need for pretrial detention.

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED the State's Motion for Pretrial Detention is GRANTED and the Defendant is to be held without bond.

DONE AND ORDERED this / day of May 2022, at DAYTONA BEACH IN VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

www.pwinsider.com/article/158890/complete-judges-order-remanding-tammy-sytch-to-jail.html?p=1

[jimmyjames]

So Tammy wasn't just drinking and driving she decided to smoke some marijuana to top this off. This keeps getting worst and worst and the trial hasn't even started.

[jason1980s]

May 13, 2022 19:00:51 GMT -5 MiLB Fan said:

PWInsider says that according to court records she did have a public defender, but hired her own attorney.

Which leads me to the question that I’m sure everyone will ask: how the hell can she afford an attorney? I’ll assume her boyfriend is footing the bill, although he’ll soon need one himself for the civil lawsuit initiated by the Lasseter estate.

I just wonder if there's ever been a person, or will ever be that is so evil that no paid or public lawyer would defend them. They all would refuse.
I will say it's pretty awful her posting the only fans stuff just a few days ago. I worked in a job where one person was a murderer and three people became murderers and though the first one wound up becoming a deacon, the last three to me had no conscience. They also had one thing in common-an adult life of 40-50 years filled with drug and alcohol abuse. They would wield around weapons to hit someone in the head, like it was nothing. Tammy may not have set out to kill that man but she's no different than the folks I knew. I can only hope time away can help her become some better, like the prisoners who teach literacy, but I highly doubt it.

And I'm guessing they'll have no issues finding a fair jury. No one will be influenced by her "fame" since she was only known for such a short period of time.

I also hope Bill Demott has changed. I feel for him losing his daughter at all but especially that way. And if this is his life's mission, I hope he can help others.

[The Captain]

Sytch is like z-list in terms of fame these days. I doubt anyone outside of big pro wrestling fans will know her by name.

She also has a constitutional right to counsel and public defenders have defended far more repugnant people. I don't think this would've been the test case even if she didn't already have a lawyer.

[Natural Born Farmer]

People in this thread are acting like a public defender has the option to just say "nope" to defending someone.

It doesn't work like that. They don't get to choose their clients.

They can request the judge release them from the case if they feel there's a genuine reason they cannot represent their client to the best of their ability, but that's going to be a rare occurrence. Generally their professional ethics are going to require them to see the case through to the end.

No matter how much of a shitbag their assigned client is, in this country those clients are still entitled to a rigorous defense.

[ayumidah]

Another new mugshot and she's STILL SMILING in it agggh!

[Milkman Norm]

May 14, 2022 13:21:45 GMT -5 Natural Born Farmer said:

People in this thread are acting like a public defender has the option to just say "nope" to defending someone.

It doesn't work like that. They don't get to choose their clients.

They can request the judge release them from the case if they feel there's a genuine reason they cannot represent their client to the best of their ability, but that's going to be a rare occurrence. Generally their professional ethics are going to require them to see the case through to the end.

No matter how much of a shitbag their assigned client is, in this country those clients are still entitled to a rigorous defense.

A vigorous defense means that they are legally and ethically required to do all they within the law to get a not guilty or get charges dismissed.

[XIII]

After reading the motion for pre-trial detention if she doesn’t serve a long time for this then I won’t know what to say.

.28 but maybe as high as .36, an open bottle of vodka in the floorboard. Found unresponsive in front of what I can only assume is a bar months after this.

Sounds like she’s going to be held until trial, which is probably the safest place for her because if she’s out on bond I truly expect the final chapter of this fiasco one way or another.

[Ringmaster]

May 14, 2022 13:34:33 GMT -5 ayumidah said:

Another new mugshot and she's STILL SMILING in it agggh!

She very likely could believe like in the multiple other cases she's had she will simply get off having to pay a bond.

I don't think the gravity of her killing another person has set in and, frankly, I don't think it ever will.

[Nosnorb]

May 13, 2022 10:13:52 GMT -5 sdoyle7798 said:

May 13, 2022 7:51:40 GMT -5 Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! said:

Normally I would never use this word, but god what a c*** she is...

I'm teh same way.

I reserve that word for the truely deserving.

This c*** deserves it.

Don't call her that. A c*** has warmth, depth and sensitivity.

[Clutchhausen]

Just saw the body cam footage. Man, she looks rough. No sympy tho.

[Alice Syndrome]

Go to jail, stay in jail, please.

[WoodStoner1]

May 13, 2022 4:11:23 GMT -5 jimmyjames said:

As bad as she's been before, this latest incident really shows what a disgusting human she is. I'm sorry but that's what she is. Some people would have a "Come to Jesus" moment and get help. Not Tammy. Almost everyone would not say anything and lay low. Mot Tammy. Instead she's out here on social media attacking people who criticize her, coming up with bulls&%$ excuses for what happened and never, never showing one ounce of remorse or sorrow for the lives she's taken and effected. Just disgusting.

If I can use my favorite TV show...I wish there was a Hetty Woodstone who could just say "You can go to hell!" and have Tammy go down on us as a result. She is worse than her husband Elias, I dare to say.

Wouldn't be the first time she went down, I'm sure. (yes, she deserves slut shaming too, in my book)

[WoodStoner1]

May 12, 2022 23:19:33 GMT -5 Oh Cry Me a Screwball said:

www.wrestlinginc.com/news/2022/05/tammy-sytch-fires-back-at-bill-demott-for-calls-to-remove-her-from-wwe-hall-of-fame/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

What a class act by Sunny, mocking the grieving father of a DUI victim. Yeah, DeMott isn't exactly a great person either, but at least he got held accountable in the end. Something Tammy Sytch will hopefully experience in the near future.

As I said before, based on the times I met him, at least Bill HAS mellowed out. He's always been super cool to me. Yes it took being held accountable, and losing his daughter, unfortunately. But hey, learning from negative experiences...something Tammy HASN'T done.

[WoodStoner1]

May 13, 2022 10:10:34 GMT -5 Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! said:

May 13, 2022 8:30:31 GMT -5 Push R Truth said:

I thought they removed Snuka from the Hall of Fame a couple years back

They never officially removed him but they did take him off the website and considering there's no actual hall, it's the closest thing they have

As I said before, probably dozens of times in this thread alone...

1) Yeah I think Snuka is not mentioned on the HOF website. They did pay tribute to him when he passed away, so it's not like they totally UnPersoned him. Hogan got this too after his scandal, albeit temporarily.

2) Yeah it's just a name on a website. But I think it's just the idea of her getting the Benoit treatment. Which she deserves.

3) Yes, if you get rid of Sunny, where do you stop? There's the Snuka example, which we think they acted on (no doubt as it was a fairly big MSM story, like Benoit but on a lesser scale of course). Then you got Carlos Colon, and his role in Brody's death. I can see people being all What About with accidental killings too (Scott Hall, Great Khali...watch some people complain if and when Rey Mysterio gets in.) There's also that certain celebrity who some blame for like 500K+ deaths and some extra at a certain other FAN-unfriendly incident 1.5 years ago.

Then you got all the non-death scandals. Spousal abuse (Austin, Savage). Convicted rapist (Tyson). People who said inflammatory/inappropriate things (Hogan, Warrior). Horrible fathers (Fritz). The whole Moolah thing (though I somehow still hold an "allegedly" near that). All of Flair's antics. There's Chyna and "what if they Google her?" She was much like Sunny except I don't think she harmed another person.

There's also the things only wrestling fans will care about, like Dusty being a horrible booker and someone who was there to just put himself over.

I think Superstar Billy Graham was removed too, at his insistence over the Abdullah thing. Yet he hasn't been behaved (his rants about how so and so should use steroids)

At this rate, Bobby Eaton will be the only HOF-worthy person out there!

[ChitownKnight]

May 16, 2022 9:12:48 GMT -5 WoodStoner1 said:

May 13, 2022 10:10:34 GMT -5 Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! said:

They never officially removed him but they did take him off the website and considering there's no actual hall, it's the closest thing they have

As I said before, probably dozens of times in this thread alone...

1) Yeah I think Snuka is not mentioned on the HOF website. They did pay tribute to him when he passed away, so it's not like they totally UnPersoned him. Hogan got this too after his scandal, albeit temporarily.

2) Yeah it's just a name on a website. But I think it's just the idea of her getting the Benoit treatment. Which she deserves.

3) Yes, if you get rid of Sunny, where do you stop? There's the Snuka example, which we think they acted on (no doubt as it was a fairly big MSM story, like Benoit but on a lesser scale of course). Then you got Carlos Colon, and his role in Brody's death. I can see people being all What About with accidental killings too (Scott Hall, Great Khali...watch some people complain if and when Rey Mysterio gets in.) There's also that certain celebrity who some blame for like 500K+ deaths and some extra at a certain other FAN-unfriendly incident 1.5 years ago.

Then you got all the non-death scandals. Spousal abuse (Austin, Savage). Convicted rapist (Tyson). People who said inflammatory/inappropriate things (Hogan, Warrior). Horrible fathers (Fritz). The whole Moolah thing (though I somehow still hold an "allegedly" near that). All of Flair's antics. There's Chyna and "what if they Google her?" She was much like Sunny except I don't think she harmed another person.

There's also the things only wrestling fans will care about, like Dusty being a horrible booker and someone who was there to just put himself over.

I think Superstar Billy Graham was removed too, at his insistence over the Abdullah thing. Yet he hasn't been behaved (his rants about how so and so should use steroids)

At this rate, Bobby Eaton will be the only HOF-worthy person out there!

Benoit, Snuka and maybe Colon (since it hasn’t really been proven) shouldn’t be in. Any accidental death was just that an accident. The fact that Sunny has shown 0 remorse and 0 redeeming qualities is what makes her deserving of being booted

[sungod2020]

May 16, 2022 9:12:48 GMT -5 WoodStoner1 said:

May 13, 2022 10:10:34 GMT -5 Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!! said:

They never officially removed him but they did take him off the website and considering there's no actual hall, it's the closest thing they have

As I said before, probably dozens of times in this thread alone...

1) Yeah I think Snuka is not mentioned on the HOF website. They did pay tribute to him when he passed away, so it's not like they totally UnPersoned him. Hogan got this too after his scandal, albeit temporarily.

2) Yeah it's just a name on a website. But I think it's just the idea of her getting the Benoit treatment. Which she deserves.

3) Yes, if you get rid of Sunny, where do you stop? There's the Snuka example, which we think they acted on (no doubt as it was a fairly big MSM story, like Benoit but on a lesser scale of course). Then you got Carlos Colon, and his role in Brody's death. I can see people being all What About with accidental killings too (Scott Hall, Great Khali...watch some people complain if and when Rey Mysterio gets in.) There's also that certain celebrity who some blame for like 500K+ deaths and some extra at a certain other FAN-unfriendly incident 1.5 years ago.

Then you got all the non-death scandals. Spousal abuse (Austin, Savage). Convicted rapist (Tyson). People who said inflammatory/inappropriate things (Hogan, Warrior). Horrible fathers (Fritz). The whole Moolah thing (though I somehow still hold an "allegedly" near that). All of Flair's antics. There's Chyna and "what if they Google her?" She was much like Sunny except I don't think she harmed another person.

There's also the things only wrestling fans will care about, like Dusty being a horrible booker and someone who was there to just put himself over.

I think Superstar Billy Graham was removed too, at his insistence over the Abdullah thing. Yet he hasn't been behaved (his rants about how so and so should use steroids)

At this rate, Bobby Eaton will be the only HOF-worthy person out there!

To add to that, Mr. Fuji was a malicious prankster and The Steiners were backstage terrors, even at one point sodomizing some poor sap with a pencil. Which brings me to the question, "where do you draw the line between separating the character and the person playing it" to where you can no longer enjoy/honor their on-screen work?

As far as whether or not to keep Sunny in the HOF goes, even without her legal troubles, does she really have a Hall of Fame worthy career? The only accolade she has is being the first modern diva. She never got anybody she managed over, she never had any memorable storylines(except maybe using Phineas Godwinn which ended up with her being slopped), she couldn't act her way out of a paper bag. She only got over because she was hot and guys wanted to look at her. 

If she was booted from the Hallowed Halls, would there really be such an outcry?  I can understand if it was one of the bigger names, but if you removed Sunny from WWF/E history, would anyone really notice? How crucial is she to the WWE canon?

[Ben Wyatt]

May 13, 2022 21:05:04 GMT -5 fortknox said:

DeMott has had his issues, but at the end of the day he'sa man who lost his daughter to horrific circumstances.  

[Baldobomb-22-OH-MAN!!!]

May 15, 2022 10:55:40 GMT -5 Ringmaster said:

May 14, 2022 13:34:33 GMT -5 ayumidah said:

Another new mugshot and she's STILL SMILING in it agggh!

She very likely could believe like in the multiple other cases she's had she will simply get off having to pay a bond.

I don't think the gravity of her killing another person has set in and, frankly, I don't think it ever will.

Since she's still blaming it on a phantom heart attack she probably still believes she's innocent.