PKO
King Koopa
Posts: 12,601
|
Post by PKO on Jun 23, 2021 13:08:18 GMT -5
The name is terrible. Even going along with the storyline that it’s an insulting name, it’s still actively terrible as a branded name. It looks unappealing written down, it sounds bad, it has no clear meaning. It’s a failure. What has happened in the last year or so? Doudrop, the Retribution names, Shorty G, Chelsea Green was going to be Victorious at one point...there have been bad names in the past but these are particularly bad and they just keep on coming As for the storyline, I actually think the bare bones of it has potential. Eva is a terrible actress still, but this is simple stuff. And yet; after just two weeks there is already dissension between the two of them, to the point that Doudrop caused Eva to lose a match on purpose. Really? On week two?! It seems like storylines are either dragged out or rushed, with no in-between. That’s a development that should happen after weeks of Eva mistreating Doudrop not on their second appearance. I’m just happy Eva got over her cold. Poor poor woman. How very WWE of them to write that line during a pandemic 😂
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jun 23, 2021 13:10:35 GMT -5
What has happened in the last year or so? Doudrop, the Retribution names, Shorty G, Chelsea Green was going to be Victorious at one point...there have been bad names in the past but these are particularly bad and they just keep on coming They got sick of everyone’s names sounding too much like regular people, I guess? *shrug*
|
|
Dr. Bolty, Disaster Enby
Grimlock
Blanket burrito season is back, and I never left the blankets
Posts: 12,801
Member is Online
|
Post by Dr. Bolty, Disaster Enby on Jun 23, 2021 13:25:59 GMT -5
What has happened in the last year or so? Doudrop, the Retribution names, Shorty G, Chelsea Green was going to be Victorious at one point...there have been bad names in the past but these are particularly bad and they just keep on coming They got sick of everyone’s names sounding too much like regular people, I guess? *shrug* I think that they're trying too hard to not have name overlap ever on a massive roster. Like, go with a weird name now just in case they want a normal-ish one later.
|
|
Pushed to the Moon
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Tony Schiavone in Disguise
Working myself into a shoot
Posts: 15,819
|
Post by Pushed to the Moon on Jun 23, 2021 16:50:00 GMT -5
I was watching the Foley Austin interview and wondering how the name Mankind would be received these days. (Let alone Doud(rop) Love)
|
|
A damn road sign
Samurai Cop
"What the hell am I? A school crossing?"
Posts: 2,424
|
Post by A damn road sign on Jun 23, 2021 16:54:51 GMT -5
I was watching the Foley Austin interview and wondering how the name Mankind would be received these days. (Let alone Doud(rop) Love) An overlooked part of the awesome Mick Foley ‘For All Mankind’ documentary from a few years back was that we got a short glimpse at the list of proposed names Mick was faxed by WWE in a similar vain to the list Steve Austin received. One of my favourites was ‘ERIC EARGONE.’
|
|
Pushed to the Moon
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Tony Schiavone in Disguise
Working myself into a shoot
Posts: 15,819
|
Post by Pushed to the Moon on Jun 23, 2021 17:03:38 GMT -5
I was watching the Foley Austin interview and wondering how the name Mankind would be received these days. (Let alone Doud(rop) Love) An overlooked part of the awesome Mick Foley ‘For All Mankind’ documentary from a few years back was that we got a short glimpse at the list of proposed names Mick was faxed by WWE in a similar vain to the list Steve Austin received. One of my favourites was ‘ERIC EARGONE.’ I assume he'd have been leading a faction of Ghostbusters.
|
|
|
Post by mistery on Jun 24, 2021 13:03:45 GMT -5
Apparently Eva Marie is already back on the alumni section of WWE.com.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jun 24, 2021 13:11:48 GMT -5
Apparently Eva Marie is already back on the alumni section of WWE.com. She was never taken out of it to start with. It’s WWE.com being slack as usual.
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Jun 24, 2021 13:17:21 GMT -5
Apparently Eva Marie is already back on the alumni section of WWE.com. She was never taken out of it to start with. It’s WWE.com being slack as usual. Like, if you told me WWE.com still has Sting in the Raw section, I would believe you.
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Jun 24, 2021 13:23:18 GMT -5
And yup, she's under present superstars now.
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jun 24, 2021 13:29:44 GMT -5
And yup, she's under present superstars now. THEY CAN FIX IT UP THAT QUICKLY? *headdesk*
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Jun 24, 2021 13:31:21 GMT -5
And yup, she's under present superstars now. THEY CAN FIX IT UP THAT QUICKLY? *headdesk* Guess that's what happens when you put SRS on the case.
|
|
|
Post by häšhtå.gdālėÿ on Jun 24, 2021 13:50:23 GMT -5
And yup, she's under present superstars now. THEY CAN FIX IT UP THAT QUICKLY? *headdesk* When Eva freakin’ Marie asks for something, you come throughdrop.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Jun 24, 2021 14:16:32 GMT -5
And yup, she's under present superstars now. THEY CAN FIX IT UP THAT QUICKLY? *headdesk* That part is undoubtedly just a database checkmark. so an update ID Eva Marie -> Section Raw Superstars type lien code could easily fix it. why they don't more often... Laziness?
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Jun 24, 2021 14:58:46 GMT -5
THEY CAN FIX IT UP THAT QUICKLY? *headdesk* That part is undoubtedly just a database checkmark. so an update ID Eva Marie -> Section Raw Superstars type lien code could easily fix it. why they don't more often... Laziness? Didn't they fire the entire team at one point last year or year before? Not the recent division they did it to be before that. Like they were left with two people to do the work of the entire office.
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Jun 24, 2021 15:01:38 GMT -5
That part is undoubtedly just a database checkmark. so an update ID Eva Marie -> Section Raw Superstars type lien code could easily fix it. why they don't more often... Laziness? Didn't they fire the entire team at one point last year or year before? Not the recent division they did it to be before that. Like they were left with two people to do the work of the entire office. Yeah, last year they pretty much fired most of the social media and website teams, including those doing some of the original YouTube content at the time, basically leaving very few and UUDD to carry that load.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Jun 24, 2021 15:02:33 GMT -5
That part is undoubtedly just a database checkmark. so an update ID Eva Marie -> Section Raw Superstars type lien code could easily fix it. why they don't more often... Laziness? Didn't they fire the entire team at one point last year or year before? Not the recent division they did it to be before that. Like they were left with two people to do the work of the entire office. possibly. Would explain why a lot of people that have been on TV for a while not having profiles.
|
|
Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 234,829
Member is Online
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Jun 24, 2021 17:05:42 GMT -5
And yup, she's under present superstars now. THEY CAN FIX IT UP THAT QUICKLY? *headdesk* Now watch Eva leave the company in a month and her profile stays in current sueprstars for three years
|
|
|
Post by Hypnosis on Jun 24, 2021 17:16:48 GMT -5
Didn't they fire the entire team at one point last year or year before? Not the recent division they did it to be before that. Like they were left with two people to do the work of the entire office. possibly. Would explain why a lot of people that have been on TV for a while not having profiles. I have to check the Smackdown Hotel WWE roster page for that reason now.
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Jun 24, 2021 17:18:48 GMT -5
It hurts to see SRS using this incredible power for Eva Marie's profile page when he could be getting the government to declassify more files on UFOs or unearthing the long-lost Mambo No. 4
|
|