|
Post by Banjo Is Broken on Jan 4, 2023 1:04:13 GMT -5
Just think how much money Tatum Paxley could get if she started an OnlyFans.
|
|
|
Post by Andew9001 on Jan 4, 2023 5:18:06 GMT -5
Just to throw it out there that Mandy selling pics is a lot more dignified than Booker losing to Triple H at Mania 19
|
|
|
Post by The Heartbreak TWERK on Jan 4, 2023 11:33:08 GMT -5
Just to throw it out there that Mandy selling pics is a lot more dignified than Booker losing to Triple H at Mania 19 How do you just take a man's soul like that?
|
|
chrom
Backup Wench
Master of the rare undecuple post
Posts: 87,326
Member is Online
|
Post by chrom on Jan 4, 2023 11:47:14 GMT -5
Remember, Living Well is the best revenge a person can get.
|
|
Hypnosis
FANatic
Posts: 106,955
Member is Online
|
Post by Hypnosis on Jan 4, 2023 12:33:58 GMT -5
She's become a millionaire from softcore porn and donuts. Mandy is truly living the dream. Is she playing in a rock band?
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jan 9, 2023 14:39:04 GMT -5
Mandy will be appearing on the Tamron Hall show tomorrow which should make for interesting viewing.
Sorry, apologize, I meant “Former WWE’s Mandy”.
|
|
Legion
Fry's dog Seymour
Amy Pond's #1 fan
Hail Hydra!
Posts: 23,416
|
Post by Legion on Jan 9, 2023 16:01:39 GMT -5
I doubt she's going to slag them off, and if she does, I dont really know why.
Regardless of the issues with Mattel or Albert or whatever, by all accounts she was given a warning before anything else and carried on (got more explicit even), so she can't act surprised/hard done by by getting fired.
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips on Jan 9, 2023 16:28:35 GMT -5
“Yeah, those jerks fired me and the ensuing publicity for my site made me a millionaire in a month. Thanks a lot, assholes!”
|
|
XIII
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,971
Member is Online
|
Post by XIII on Jan 9, 2023 16:29:59 GMT -5
If I had to guess Mandy will just be there to promote one of her businesses and there will probably be little mention of the WWE(other than she’s a former WWE wrestler) or her site.
|
|
|
Post by sarkerpolseng on Jan 9, 2023 17:03:46 GMT -5
Mandy will be appearing on the Tamron Hall show tomorrow which should make for interesting viewing. Sorry, apologize, I meant “Former WWE’s Mandy”. Damn. It costs $30 to view it though.
|
|
|
Post by ThankGodForSidJustice on Jan 9, 2023 17:18:08 GMT -5
Is she playing in a rock band? Mandy Rose and The Toxic Attraction Band Mandy Rose: Lead Vocals, Guitar Jacy Jayne: Bass Guitar Gigi Dolin: Drums Sonya Deville: Lead Guitar
|
|
markymark
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 19,934
|
Post by markymark on Jan 10, 2023 10:21:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Finish Uncle Muffin’s Story on Jan 10, 2023 10:24:40 GMT -5
Going on national TV a few weeks after being fired is probably a sign she doesn't really care to come back anytime soon.
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jan 10, 2023 10:30:59 GMT -5
www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.php?id=166834So they asked her to pull down the controversial and she did and besides that, there wasn't any problems doing it...nor did they say that they told her why she was let go...so why did they let her go? And it's bizarre to me that WWE, knowing that she was going to be on this show during her 90 day probation...didn't say anything to the Tamron Hall show? Considering they were quick to get on Keith Lee saying he paid for his medical care or Sasha and Naomi walking out and with that audience basically reacting like she got messed around with...why wouldn't you put out a statement or something beforehand?
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jan 10, 2023 10:35:07 GMT -5
She didn’t slam the company and seemed to indicate she would be open to a return. And if the site had to come down for a return, that would be a conversation they could have. What it seemed like to me, and I can't tell because she said it was confidential so we'll likely never truly know, is that maybe they did ask her and she wasn't budging on that because how much she was making so they let her go but it didn't seem like that was the reason from what she said? The whole thing just leaves more questions than answers besides the fact Mandy is grateful for the opportunity and won't exactly be going broke anytime soon.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Jan 10, 2023 10:37:00 GMT -5
She didn’t slam the company and seemed to indicate she would be open to a return. And if the site had to come down for a return, that would be a conversation they could have. What it seemed like to me, and I can't tell because she said it was confidential so we'll likely never truly know, is that maybe they did ask her and she wasn't budging on that because how much she was making so they let her go but it didn't seem like that was the reason from what she said? The whole thing just leaves more questions than answers besides the fact Mandy is grateful for the opportunity and won't exactly be going broke anytime soon. I don’t think she said that they didn’t say her release was because of the site. I think she was saying they didn’t tell her before she dropped the title that she was dropping it because of the site.
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jan 10, 2023 10:40:45 GMT -5
I don’t think she said that they didn’t say her release was because of the site. I think she was saying they didn’t tell her before she dropped the title that she was dropping it because of the site. Which is still a weird thing to do, I guess. Like, it's not like they haven't had conversations about it, as Mandy said they did with others being confidential and...I don't know, we can't know the finer details, and that's the problem, there's still holes in this.
|
|
|
Post by Finish Uncle Muffin’s Story on Jan 10, 2023 10:43:25 GMT -5
www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.php?id=166834So they asked her to pull down the controversial and she did and besides that, there wasn't any problems doing it...nor did they say that they told her why she was let go...so why did they let her go? And it's bizarre to me that WWE, knowing that she was going to be on this show during her 90 day probation...didn't say anything to the Tamron Hall show? Considering they were quick to get on Keith Lee saying he paid for his medical care or Sasha and Naomi walking out and with that audience basically reacting like she got messed around with...why wouldn't you put out a statement or something beforehand? They get no value in responding to her and just give the story more oxygen. This will go away in a day or two, but the minute the company responds, that gives it more credibility. Plus, they've got enough going on from a press standpoint right now. Responding to Mandy is (rightfully) not priority #1.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2023 10:47:10 GMT -5
www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.php?id=166834So they asked her to pull down the controversial and she did and besides that, there wasn't any problems doing it...nor did they say that they told her why she was let go...so why did they let her go? And it's bizarre to me that WWE, knowing that she was going to be on this show during her 90 day probation...didn't say anything to the Tamron Hall show? Considering they were quick to get on Keith Lee saying he paid for his medical care or Sasha and Naomi walking out and with that audience basically reacting like she got messed around with...why wouldn't you put out a statement or something beforehand? Pretty sure WWE told her to tone down the content if not outright stopped and then went and put out more explicit material atleast that was the majority view coming out of her release. And why would WWE say anything? you are talking about 2 different regimes....The Keith Lee , Sasha and Naomi stuff was all under when Vince was in charge.
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jan 10, 2023 10:47:25 GMT -5
They get no value in responding to her and just give the story more oxygen. This will go away in a day or two, but the minute the company responds, that gives it more credibility. Plus, they've got enough going on from a press standpoint right now. Responding to Mandy is (rightfully) not priority #1. It's not but they also must know how it looks to not respond, right? Especially with how the audience reacted to it and seeing the pictures of her with the two belts? They were quick on the pulse of more useless things than this or even saying the wrong things like with Jimmy Uso last year. And it's also not like they don't have a small press department. They can respond to things even with Vince looming over everything, they're a big company. I don't know, I'd have said something like "We appreciate Mandy's time as NXT Women's Champion but a disagreement led us to having to go our separate ways and we wish her the best in her future endeavors". It wouldn't be inaccurate to what she said here.
|
|