|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jul 7, 2023 2:49:09 GMT -5
The worst thing was those belts using the lineage that began in 2002. I still don't know why they would do that when you see who the first winners of those titles were. The funny thing is, they could literally cut the lineage data to the page for the original tag titles on the website, change everything else accordingly and then suddenly it DOES count towards it, because those webpages on WWE.com are literally all that is used to determine what belongs in what lineage. Everything else like Wikipedia bases their data on that. It’s that gossamer-thin a premise. Like, have they EVER mentioned title lineage on TV? |
|
|
|
Post by Brickstone Kid on Jul 7, 2023 11:25:13 GMT -5
For further reference for how far The Usos have come, they debuted on the main roster only a few months prior to this. And barely got any reactions at all. Me and my Friend used to joke their pops were so loud we were deaf. And look at them now. Me and my friends used to joke that if you pulled out the handkerchief hanging out of the Usos' back pocket, they would die. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulk With A Mustache on Jul 7, 2023 11:49:26 GMT -5
And they can't even name the tag team that won the first ever titles, due to reasons. AND… they dropped the legacy of the old World Tag Team Titles in favor of the 2002 WWE Tag Team Titles that start with He Who Shall Not Be Named three years after that incident!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jul 7, 2023 11:53:08 GMT -5
Nothing beats the classic tag belts.
|
|
