The Raven
Hank Scorpio
Where The Raven flies, there's Jeopardy!: Sports Edition
Posts: 5,907
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 14:44:31 GMT -5
Post by The Raven on Jul 1, 2007 14:44:31 GMT -5
So can I, I would just like to know what the maximum allowable size is, so I can adjust it accordingly.
Big, big penis. I've explained this.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 14:48:21 GMT -5
Post by Kash Flagg on Jul 1, 2007 14:48:21 GMT -5
I've been looking around, but to be honest, I don't know.
|
|
The Raven
Hank Scorpio
Where The Raven flies, there's Jeopardy!: Sports Edition
Posts: 5,907
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 14:53:59 GMT -5
Post by The Raven on Jul 1, 2007 14:53:59 GMT -5
Oh well, thank you for attempting to help me.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 15:23:59 GMT -5
Post by Tyfo on Jul 1, 2007 15:23:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 15:24:02 GMT -5
Post by Drillbit Taylor on Jul 1, 2007 15:24:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 15:24:45 GMT -5
Post by MGH on Jul 1, 2007 15:24:45 GMT -5
I'm really starting to despise that guy.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 15:31:59 GMT -5
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jul 1, 2007 15:31:59 GMT -5
taken care of. again.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 16:37:22 GMT -5
Post by maxx420 on Jul 1, 2007 16:37:22 GMT -5
So can I, I would just like to know what the maximum allowable size is, so I can adjust it accordingly. Big, big penis. I've explained this. 500 X 250 or 250 X 500, one of the two.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 16:38:04 GMT -5
Post by Kash Flagg on Jul 1, 2007 16:38:04 GMT -5
Thank you Maxx. Yer a gem.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 21:54:33 GMT -5
Post by kawalimus on Jul 1, 2007 21:54:33 GMT -5
Ok this a question about current climate on forums.
With Benoit stuff going on and the possible political involvement, this opens the door for LOTS of rulebreaking discussions. But thing about that rule is it says if politics pertains to wrestling they can be discussed. But what's gonna happen if there really is some political involvement? I'm cautious approaching some political stuff and some my stuff already been deleted and I wanna know if there might be temporary redefining of political rules while the Benoit and senator stuff is going on.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 22:02:51 GMT -5
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jul 1, 2007 22:02:51 GMT -5
I'd suggest that this will be dealt with on a case by case basis, as we've never really dealt with anything quite like this before, however it'd probably be better to go with 'just the facts' without putting opinion into it. That said, I'll let Madison address this in more detail
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 22:08:22 GMT -5
Post by kawalimus on Jul 1, 2007 22:08:22 GMT -5
OK thanks cause sometimes I look for my stuff and it's deleted but other times I look back and it's still there.
Only problem I see is saying "post just facts" would be like saying you could only post the results of wrestling matches and not discuss them.
When I see my stuff deleted I think mods think I'm trying to raise commotion and I'm a trouble maker and I have been on trouble on different boards before. And one day I'm gonna log on and see I'm banned cause of something I posted about politics but I thought it was within the rules.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 22:22:29 GMT -5
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jul 1, 2007 22:22:29 GMT -5
Unless you've been warned personally the deletions aren't any kinda personal thing. And you'll (almost) always receive two warnings for any rule breaks.
|
|
NIXON
Unicron
Hail to the Chief Bootknocker
Posts: 3,354
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 22:52:29 GMT -5
Post by NIXON on Jul 1, 2007 22:52:29 GMT -5
Is it ok to make a Who do you dislike on this board? thread in response to the "Who do you mark for" thread? Not to flame, but just to list the people you don't get along with, or who's posts you don't enjoy. I wasn't sure if it would be considered flaming or not. Just thought I would ask cause I am a warning away from being banished.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 23:05:00 GMT -5
Post by Allison Reynolds on Jul 1, 2007 23:05:00 GMT -5
Sorry Losaphone, but we can't allow a thread like that. I don't see how it could be a good thing personally, and some of the other moderators have deleted threads like that before.
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 23:06:01 GMT -5
Post by Joe Neglia on Jul 1, 2007 23:06:01 GMT -5
In regards to other posters? No, let's stay away from that topic, please. It can and will lead to trouble, arguing, bad feelings and Kash kicking a Wal-Mart greeter in the nuts.
|
|
NIXON
Unicron
Hail to the Chief Bootknocker
Posts: 3,354
|
AskaMod
Jul 1, 2007 23:12:11 GMT -5
Post by NIXON on Jul 1, 2007 23:12:11 GMT -5
Alright then. Glad I asked first. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Kash Flagg on Jul 2, 2007 7:05:00 GMT -5
Well there goes my trip to Wal-Mart.
|
|
Brain Of F'n J
Hank Scorpio
Not that cool enough to have one of these....wait.
We Discodians must stick apart.
Posts: 6,890
|
AskaMod
Jul 2, 2007 12:52:15 GMT -5
Post by Brain Of F'n J on Jul 2, 2007 12:52:15 GMT -5
Okay ... just noticed the filter changed something it didn't before. I was using F, followed by **k (I was quoting St. Carlin). It used to let this stand. Now, it's "smurf", which kinda smurfs up the flow of the quote. Is the asterik-solution no longer viable?
Jed Shaffer ~Normally, it wouldn't bug me, but I wanted to have George's exact words for impact purposes (with appropriate *'s).
|
|
|
AskaMod
Jul 2, 2007 12:53:44 GMT -5
Post by Joe Neglia on Jul 2, 2007 12:53:44 GMT -5
We ask that everything following the F is an asterick, not just part of it.
|
|