|
Post by Doctor Tull-eus S. Venture on Jan 30, 2007 20:59:08 GMT -5
Hey i'm new around here, but i was just thinking if The Undertaker does face Batista at Wrestlemania, and does maintain his streak...he will have done the clean sweep of Evolution at Wrestlemainia.....HHH, Flair, Orton then Batista....maybe not interesting but a random observation non the less First, welcome to the boards! Second, this is a interesting observation, I just wish it would have happened back when Evolution menat something.
|
|
|
Post by shockthaworld2 on Jan 30, 2007 23:41:37 GMT -5
$10 says that the WWE doesn't mention 'Taker's streak leading up to WM, then Big Dave wins...I mean what do you people want? Continuity?.....Vince laughs at you all
|
|
Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on Jan 30, 2007 23:42:10 GMT -5
I'd like Kane or Edge to end it.
|
|
|
Post by samachine on Jan 30, 2007 23:45:36 GMT -5
If Taker gets to win the rumble he should have to lose his streak. It's only right
|
|
|
Post by krazysane on Jan 31, 2007 0:01:05 GMT -5
have him lose the streak to someone who isnt a main eventer.. someone young who has never won a world title.. thats the only way id accept a win over taker
|
|
oltrelamorte
Don Corleone
Comin' for you, Big Boss Man!
Posts: 1,375
|
Post by oltrelamorte on Jan 31, 2007 0:24:26 GMT -5
I hope Batista doesn't end his streak. I'm not much a Taker fan but to have his streak ended by someone as poopy as Turdtista is a slap to the face. I'd rather have Sexual Chocoloate Mark Henry or The Great Khali end it than Batista.
Orton should've ended it. Since he didn't, Edge should.
|
|
|
Post by extremek on Jan 31, 2007 1:01:08 GMT -5
I'd like Kane or Edge to end it. I second that.
|
|
|
Post by odanobunaga on Jan 31, 2007 1:11:33 GMT -5
Something that bogles my mind is that they are problably giving the biggest match of Batista carrer and Batista not only will get the most of it, but himself will become a legend.
If he gave a damn about wrestling...This could be good. This could be great. But he doesn´t.
|
|
|
Post by Rorschach on Jan 31, 2007 1:29:31 GMT -5
I'd like Kane or Edge to end it. I second that. I'll tear off and THIRD it.
|
|
|
Post by kickassforumguyme on Jan 31, 2007 2:49:07 GMT -5
Undertaker should retire with his streak.
He's been in the E for 15 years and he never jumped ship to WCW. I know he was there originally but he didn't make it big until his time in the E.
He didnt have many title runs or even long ones. Let him keep the streak along with his other accomplishments.
|
|
|
Post by Francis on Jan 31, 2007 4:41:15 GMT -5
I don't mind him losing the streak, it's just nobody at this time really deserves it.
Who's the young, hungry Steve Austin on the current roster? I don't see anyone.
Cena doesn't need it either, he's already over, so might as well let him keep the damn streak and have a nice title run.
|
|
Shake A Leg
Team Rocket
PLEASE DEAR GOD, LET HIM KEEP THE STREAK!
Posts: 966
|
Post by Shake A Leg on Jan 31, 2007 7:54:17 GMT -5
I don't mind him losing the streak, it's just nobody at this time really deserves it. Who's the young, hungry Steve Austin on the current roster? I don't see anyone. Cena doesn't need it either, he's already over, so might as well let him keep the damn streak and have a nice title run. He deserves to keep to the damn streak!
|
|
clifford
King Koopa
Shingo Takagi stan
Posts: 10,690
|
Post by clifford on Jan 31, 2007 8:00:56 GMT -5
Sorry I misread this as Undertaker Steak theory.... silly I know, but i'd have looooved to have heard a thought on Taker eating his T-Bones and Sirloins.... mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....................
|
|
|
Post by x on Jan 31, 2007 8:21:26 GMT -5
The streak has no point in it unless he loses it to someone.
When your in the business for 20+ years you aren't there to continually put yourself over. You are there to put younger talent over.
A win over the Undertaker at WrestleMania would immediatly be the biggest push of someone's life. But you can't give it to any current main eventer, they're already a WWE Main Eventer...they don't need any more of a push for now. If you gave that title win to a young guy you could make him a star...no matter who he is. If you took Daniel Rodimer, Kenny, Mitch whoever, as long as they're under 30 and go over Taker they are automatically a star.
Now to everyone who says "Taker can't lose the streak..."
If Triple H comes back and has a 20 year title reign and then retires with the belt will you be mad? Why? Because he didn't put anyone over. (Point made.)
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Jan 31, 2007 9:45:20 GMT -5
$10 says that the WWE doesn't mention 'Taker's streak leading up to WM, then Big Dave wins...I mean what do you people want? Continuity?.....Vince laughs at you all That's the only piece of continuity the WWE is consistant of. Don't tell me you forgot all the gazillions of videos leading up to the last 3 Manias, did you?
|
|
Mark4HBK
Unicron
How to kill a guy in three easy steps.
Posts: 2,521
|
Post by Mark4HBK on Jan 31, 2007 10:41:45 GMT -5
I've mentioned this in other threads, but it stands to be repeated - The Undertaker will not job at Mania unless Mark Calaway chooses to put his opponent over. Vince McMahon will never order 'Taker to job at Mania, as the legacy of the streak is WWE's "thank you" to Calaway for his 16+ years of loyal service to the company.
In other words, if Calaway suggests it, it could happen. Ain't nobody in the back going to suggest it to him, though...
|
|
bigjimmy
Don Corleone
WWF Attitude
Posts: 1,257
|
Post by bigjimmy on Jan 31, 2007 16:39:52 GMT -5
I've mentioned this in other threads, but it stands to be repeated - The Undertaker will not job at Mania unless Mark Calaway chooses to put his opponent over. Vince McMahon will never order 'Taker to job at Mania, as the legacy of the streak is WWE's "thank you" to Calaway for his 16+ years of loyal service to the company. In other words, if Calaway suggests it, it could happen. Ain't nobody in the back going to suggest it to him, though... i have said the same thing, he never had a significant title run so the streak is his legacy (that will probably be broken after he retires) and i do belive it should stay in tact!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2007 17:54:52 GMT -5
The trouble with anyone beating Taker at Wrestlemania is simple, Wrestlemania has been for the last few years the stable of the hardcore WWE fans for a while. The same fans who booed the crap out of Cena against HHH, the fans who went mad who marked for the excellently booked Batista/HHH feud, the fans who mared like hell for the Rock/Hulk Hogan.
The point is if anyone, ANYONE short of Kane (due to the years long history) beats Undertaker at Wrestlemania the fans there will boo the crap out of it. Its inevitably gonna be Taker vs Batista. Even I don't think the creative team is that stupid. Vince still has something resembling a brain, even if its hidden under years of steroids and ego. They would be fools to have Batista beat Taker. If Cena beat Taker, yeah I could understand that, even go for it if the booking was good enough (I know they work well together, watch their Smackdown match from back in summer '03, it was very, VERY good). But either way, if Taker loses, the Wrestlemania fans will riot.
In any case, its gonna be interesting this year. Most people thought HHH's ego would beat Cena, but they forgot Cena is the new Hogan. The go who does five moves that pops the kids and the girls and wins the match AGAINST ALL ODDS. If Taker faces Cena, Cena will win, no doubt about that. If Taker faces Batista... it could go either way. They'd be fools to give the streak to Batista, but they CAN be stupid enough to actually go for it. But at the same time they could genuinely give Taker that win and have him lose to a rising contender, e.g. Mr. Kennedy.
My point is, at this point the title situation at Wrestlemania is wide open. In the end all it comes down to is who Taker challenges. If Cena, we know whose winning, for better or for worse. If Batista... it might get a little more interesting. Time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by Hulk With A Mustache on Jan 31, 2007 19:08:58 GMT -5
I hope Undertaker doesn't lose at WrestleMania.
|
|
|
Post by normcoleman on Jan 31, 2007 21:28:38 GMT -5
I can honestly see Cena being the one to break it. Rememeber, he is New Hogan.
|
|