Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on Jan 30, 2007 22:47:04 GMT -5
Just wondering.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 30, 2007 22:52:11 GMT -5
Uh.....f*** NO.
|
|
Godhand
Team Rocket
The feel good poster of the year
Posts: 803
|
Post by Godhand on Jan 30, 2007 22:53:07 GMT -5
NO f***ING WAY.
|
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Jan 30, 2007 22:55:27 GMT -5
Ok, there's two yes's, surely a joke, but just in case, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOURSELVES!!
|
|
The G.O.A.T.
Don Corleone
This post may or may not be credited to Rajah.com
Posts: 1,433
|
Post by The G.O.A.T. on Jan 30, 2007 22:56:36 GMT -5
Ok, there's two yes's, surely a joke, but just in case, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOURSELVES!! |
|
Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on Jan 30, 2007 22:58:01 GMT -5
Ok, there's two yes's, surely a joke, but just in case, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOURSELVES!! |
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 30, 2007 23:00:27 GMT -5
Insert the brilliant logic of "I never saw the original, so I voted for the new one! lolz!"
|
|
AmandaJ
Don Corleone
My heart...after you broke it.
Posts: 1,969
|
Post by AmandaJ on Jan 30, 2007 23:02:20 GMT -5
The question is, would anybody actually admit that they did?
|
|
|
|
Post by skiller on Jan 30, 2007 23:03:25 GMT -5
It's really no contest. Old ECW > than any other ECW ever.
|
|
Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on Jan 30, 2007 23:03:26 GMT -5
The question is, would anybody actually admit that they did? No, because they would get TEH FLAM3'D!!ONEONEONE |
|
The G.O.A.T.
Don Corleone
This post may or may not be credited to Rajah.com
Posts: 1,433
|
Post by The G.O.A.T. on Jan 30, 2007 23:04:16 GMT -5
The question is, would anybody actually admit that they did? apparently not How can you with that pathetic lashley/Test fued |
|
|
|
Post by amplifierWORSHIP! on Jan 30, 2007 23:07:31 GMT -5
old ECW was revolutionary and entertained me to no end
new ECW makes me whine and complain on internet forums
period!
|
|
|
|
Post by #Classic Hi-Definition X on Jan 30, 2007 23:08:33 GMT -5
The question is, would anybody actually admit that they did? If they did, they'd probably get blasted for it, because heaven forbid someone like this ECW better than the old ECW. |
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on Jan 30, 2007 23:09:33 GMT -5
In a word, no
|
|
|
|
Post by Lenny: Smooth like Keith Stone on Jan 30, 2007 23:09:42 GMT -5
I know who the two Yes votes are.....
Those two jailbait "die hards" that love Kelly Kelly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Jan 30, 2007 23:10:53 GMT -5
Not even if the New ECW gave out free Zebra Cakes & Asian Hookers.
|
|
Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on Jan 30, 2007 23:12:42 GMT -5
Another vote for "Shucks, YES".
Oh dear.
|
|
|
|
Post by heyguesswhatidid on Jan 30, 2007 23:13:54 GMT -5
I voted no, but remember, the old ECW had junk like Bilvis Wesley.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 30, 2007 23:14:56 GMT -5
I voted no, but remember, the old ECW had junk like Bilvis Wesley. Yes, difference being it had more than enough to make up for it. Sort of like WWE 99-01. |
|
|
|
Post by heyguesswhatidid on Jan 30, 2007 23:16:33 GMT -5
I voted no, but remember, the old ECW had junk like Bilvis Wesley. Yes, difference being it had more than enough to make up for it. Sort of like WWE 99-01. True, but I found late 2000 ECW to be pretty bad. Maybe I was just to big of a Raven Vs. Tommy Dreamer mark. |
|
