|
|
Post by robferatu on Jan 31, 2007 1:21:14 GMT -5
I like this idea.
Makes me want to buy the PPV now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Jan 31, 2007 1:55:22 GMT -5
So Batista only defends his title on Major PPVs.
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Jan 31, 2007 2:06:28 GMT -5
I hate this Idea. I hate having opponents tag with each other before they wrestle. And why does Batista rarely defend his title?
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Jan 31, 2007 2:09:04 GMT -5
So Batista only defends his title on Major PPVs. Just like the good old days of Hogan, Flair, and Sting. The World Title isn't something that should be defended all the time, it's gotta be earned. It seems like a bigger deal when the title is defended |
|
Dean-o
Grimlock
Haha we're having fun Maggle!
Posts: 13,865 
|
Post by Dean-o on Jan 31, 2007 2:54:45 GMT -5
So Batista only defends his title on Major PPVs. Just like the good old days of Hogan, Flair, and Sting. The World Title isn't something that should be defended all the time, it's gotta be earned. It seems like a bigger deal when the title is defended But if the title was on (Insert IWC favorite) they would be a fighting champion!  |
|
|
|
Post by Austin's Middle Finger on Jan 31, 2007 13:02:16 GMT -5
So Batista only defends his title on Major PPVs. Just like the good old days of Hogan, Flair, and Sting. The World Title isn't something that should be defended all the time, it's gotta be earned. It seems like a bigger deal when the title is defended Yeah. I'm no fan of Batista, but they've been booking his title run pretty well so far. We also get to see less of him on SD, which is always a good thing. |
|
