|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 1:14:00 GMT -5
Yeah, people who talk about Wrestling on the Internet sure are stupid... *grabs your hands and hits you in the face with your own hands* Quit flaming yourself! Stop flaming yourself! Why you flaming yourself!?
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Jan 29, 2007 1:27:01 GMT -5
Not to be negative, but how come people complain about older guys getting the title and not letting the new generation get the rub, but when Taker wins it its alright? I don't think you're right dude, people hate the Undertaker going over. I think with a Projected Main Event of Batista/Undertaker the 75,000 tickets will be sold. If it was Undertaker/Kennedy I don't think it would be.
|
|
Boku AKA Da Green Guy
El Dandy
WC's Resident Pirate Otaku and Official Scapegoat
Always and Forever, Hurricane.
Posts: 8,371
|
Post by Boku AKA Da Green Guy on Jan 29, 2007 1:31:21 GMT -5
The reason I'm okay with it is that 'Taker isn't a greedy or power hungry individual.
He does what's best for the business.
His fued with Kennedy made me look at Kennedy as a possible main eventer.
And besides, there's no younger talent right now that is deserving of the Royal Rumble win right now.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Marzvon Zombie M.D. on Jan 29, 2007 1:40:53 GMT -5
No thanks. Give him a watch for being there the longest, and send him on his way. He needs to retire, ASAP. maybe true, but still better then anything batista can do and f*** he is almost as old as taker!
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 1:43:51 GMT -5
The reason I'm okay with it is that 'Taker isn't a greedy or power hungry individual. He does what's best for the business. Didn't Taker squash a bunch of guys at a Survivor Series, and Matt Hardy got in trouble for not wanting to be squashed?
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Marzvon Zombie M.D. on Jan 29, 2007 1:44:40 GMT -5
The reason I'm okay with it is that 'Taker isn't a greedy or power hungry individual. He does what's best for the business. Didn't Taker squash a bunch of guys at a Survivor Series, and Matt Hardy got in trouble for not wanting to be squashed? yea he fled the ring thinking his push would be messed up because of it ;D
|
|
Boku AKA Da Green Guy
El Dandy
WC's Resident Pirate Otaku and Official Scapegoat
Always and Forever, Hurricane.
Posts: 8,371
|
Post by Boku AKA Da Green Guy on Jan 29, 2007 1:46:17 GMT -5
The reason I'm okay with it is that 'Taker isn't a greedy or power hungry individual. He does what's best for the business. Didn't Taker squash a bunch of guys at a Survivor Series, and Matt Hardy got in trouble for not wanting to be squashed? Didn't Cena squash the entire ECW brand at the contract signing with RVD?
|
|
|
Post by Ultimo Chocula on Jan 29, 2007 1:47:21 GMT -5
Taker vs Batista, eh? Hmmm.......
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Jan 29, 2007 1:59:48 GMT -5
No thanks. Give him a watch for being there the longest, and send him on his way. He needs to retire, ASAP. maybe true, but still better then anything batista can do and wax he is almost as old as taker! Oh, yeah, no doubt there. I've gone on record as saying that Batista's the worst champion WWE's had in recent history.
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 2:11:22 GMT -5
Didn't Taker squash a bunch of guys at a Survivor Series, and Matt Hardy got in trouble for not wanting to be squashed? Didn't Cena squash the entire ECW brand at the contract signing with RVD? I don't like Cena, either. What's your point? ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2007 2:14:28 GMT -5
Didn't Taker squash a bunch of guys at a Survivor Series, and Matt Hardy got in trouble for not wanting to be squashed? Didn't Cena squash the entire ECW brand at the contract signing with RVD? Either example doesn't really prove that either are power hungry, it's more about people doing as they're told. But anyway it blows my MIND that there's such thing as being anti-Taker....I mean, is there even one thing anyone can say that he's doing wrong? ANYTHING!?
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 2:17:48 GMT -5
I've never been a fan of the Taker. I'll admit when he has a good match, but I'm not a fan of the gimmick, and I just generally don't care for him.
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Jan 29, 2007 2:18:32 GMT -5
I've never been a fan of the Taker. I'll admit when he has a good match, but I'm not a fan of the gimmick, and I just generally don't care for him. Same here, generally speaking. I haven't been a full on 'Taker fan since the Ministry days. That was the last time I was fanatical about being a fan of his.
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 2:20:38 GMT -5
I've never been a fan of the Taker. I'll admit when he has a good match, but I'm not a fan of the gimmick, and I just generally don't care for him. Same here, generally speaking. I haven't been a full on 'Taker fan since the Ministry days. That was the last time I was fanatical about being a fan of his. And I wasn't even a fan then. Crucifying people is way over the top (considering it was on a big T for Taker).
|
|
Boku AKA Da Green Guy
El Dandy
WC's Resident Pirate Otaku and Official Scapegoat
Always and Forever, Hurricane.
Posts: 8,371
|
Post by Boku AKA Da Green Guy on Jan 29, 2007 2:21:27 GMT -5
Didn't Cena squash the entire ECW brand at the contract signing with RVD? Either example doesn't really prove that either are power hungry, it's more about people doing as they're told. But anyway it blows my MIND that there's such thing as being anti-Taker....I mean, is there even one thing anyone can say that he's doing wrong? ANYTHING!? Thanks for proving a point that I was too lazy to say.
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 29, 2007 2:22:04 GMT -5
I'm only glad he won because he's a better option than Batista. If he was challenging Edge or Kennedy I'd be up in arms thinking of him leaving Mania with the title.
And as for Cena ... well screw my usual "quit putting older guys over all the time" thing, I hate Cena. I'd want Taker to crush him too.
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Jan 29, 2007 2:22:33 GMT -5
Same here, generally speaking. I haven't been a full on 'Taker fan since the Ministry days. That was the last time I was fanatical about being a fan of his. And I wasn't even a fan then. Crucifying people is way over the top (considering it was on a big T for Taker). Well, yeah, but when he burned that teddy bear and Vince just went into hysterics, I was a confirmed Ministry mark.
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Jan 29, 2007 2:52:29 GMT -5
I'd rather it have been Shawn, but I guess I'm ok with 'Taker.
|
|
MolotovMocktail
Grimlock
Home of the 5-time, 5-time, 5-time, 5-time 5-time Super Bowl Champion 49ers-and Wrestlemania 31
Posts: 14,054
|
Post by MolotovMocktail on Jan 29, 2007 3:18:10 GMT -5
He needed to get a Rumble win before he retired. The only thing left is for him to win a KOTR. Just have him get the title off Batista.
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Jan 29, 2007 3:25:00 GMT -5
He needed to get a Rumble win before he retired. The only thing left is for him to win a KOTR. Just have him get the title off Batista. I still don't get why he deserves it just because he hasn't gotten it before. The guys legacy is written in stone as legendary with or without a Rumble win. The guy has arguably the most notable win streak ever, and is just generally a legendary figure in the business. Who cares if he didn't win a Rumble?
|
|