|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Jan 28, 2007 22:49:16 GMT -5
THE UNDATAKAH!!!!!!!!!
HOLLA HOLLA HOLLA!
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulk With A Mustache on Jan 28, 2007 22:49:52 GMT -5
His victory has destroyed the WWE Current forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suck it Trebek! on Jan 28, 2007 22:50:25 GMT -5
WHOA!!
WTF is going on with the board?
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 28, 2007 22:50:46 GMT -5
Predictable. But it was either going to be him or HBK, so this leaves the Raw main event wide open.
|
|
|
|
Post by odanobunaga on Jan 28, 2007 22:51:03 GMT -5
Yup...Let´s hope The Undertaker wins Batista title.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 28, 2007 22:51:40 GMT -5
And yes, whether it's against Cena or Batista, I will for once be rooting for Taker to win.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Jan 28, 2007 22:51:57 GMT -5
The one guy that doesn't need the Rumble win to establish his credibility as a contender wins the thing. Great job, Vince, or whoever put that together.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Jan 28, 2007 22:52:34 GMT -5
The Undertaker deserves it I feel. Plus Batista may end up being almost as hated as he was towards ECW fans.
|
|
|
|
Post by ghettooverlord on Jan 28, 2007 22:53:17 GMT -5
The one guy that doesn't need the Rumble win to establish his credibility as a contender wins the thing. Great job, Vince, or whoever put that together. It's the one thing that he hasn't done. I'd assume, like the Kane title run everyone has been begging for, it's out of respect for his work throughout sixteen years. He deserved it. |
|
|
|
Post by Allison Reynolds on Jan 28, 2007 22:53:29 GMT -5
Loved it. UT winning made me jump with joy. I'm a big fan of the guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 28, 2007 22:55:43 GMT -5
And yes, whether it's against Cena or Batista, I will for once be rooting for Taker to win. So if he faces Lashley you're cheering for Lashley? |
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Jan 28, 2007 22:55:53 GMT -5
The one guy that doesn't need the Rumble win to establish his credibility as a contender wins the thing. Great job, Vince, or whoever put that together. It's the one thing that he hasn't done. I'd assume, like the Kane title run everyone has been begging for, it's out of respect for his work throughout sixteen years. He deserved it. Who cares if it's the one thing he hasn't done? That just means that he was over enough that he didn't need it, and despite the fact that he needs to retire, and SOON, he still doesn't need that Rumble win. The fans would have accepted him as a challenger with no build whatsoever if he just walked into 'Mania and challenged whichever champion he wanted anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 28, 2007 22:56:37 GMT -5
And yes, whether it's against Cena or Batista, I will for once be rooting for Taker to win. So if he faces Lashley you're cheering for Lashley? Are you joking? Hell no. |
|
|
|
Post by rrm15 on Jan 28, 2007 22:57:15 GMT -5
I'm still marking out. Awesome, awesome finish.
|
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 28, 2007 22:58:04 GMT -5
So if he faces Lashley you're cheering for Lashley? Are you joking? Hell no. Well you left him out so I had to ask. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Jan 28, 2007 22:58:45 GMT -5
Predictable. But it was either going to be him or HBK, so this leaves the Raw main event wide open. Would it be predictable if one hasn't any insiders info or the internet for that matter? |
|
|
|
Post by ghettooverlord on Jan 28, 2007 22:59:11 GMT -5
It's the one thing that he hasn't done. I'd assume, like the Kane title run everyone has been begging for, it's out of respect for his work throughout sixteen years. He deserved it. Who cares if it's the one thing he hasn't done? That just means that he was over enough that he didn't need it, and despite the fact that he needs to retire, and SOON, he still doesn't need that Rumble win. The fans would have accepted him as a challenger with no build whatsoever if he just walked into 'Mania and challenged whichever champion he wanted anyway. Yeah, I know, WWE sucks, blah blah, rah rah, RoH RoH? You're right, the match sucked because despite the fact that last ten minutes was quite the epic, Taker won and it ruined your day. Did you even watch the show? |
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Jan 28, 2007 23:01:17 GMT -5
Who cares if it's the one thing he hasn't done? That just means that he was over enough that he didn't need it, and despite the fact that he needs to retire, and SOON, he still doesn't need that Rumble win. The fans would have accepted him as a challenger with no build whatsoever if he just walked into 'Mania and challenged whichever champion he wanted anyway. Yeah, I know, WWE sucks, blah blah, rah rah, RoH RoH? You're right, the match sucked because despite the fact that last ten minutes was quite the epic, Taker won and it ruined your day. Did you even watch the show? First off, I've only watched one ROH show in my life, and it's a very early one, don't use that stupid little thing with me. Second, I did not watch the show, but that didn't change the fact that Taker DOESN'T NEED TO WIN THE RUMBLE. He's over enough any way. He could have lost the Rumble, dissappeared for two months, walked into 'Mania in the main event, challenged whoever he wanted to ,and the fans still would have accepted it. Give the Rumble win to someone who actually needs it, don't give it to a guy just because he's been around the longest. |
|
|
|
Post by #Classic Hi-Definition X on Jan 28, 2007 23:04:56 GMT -5
All right guys, simmah dahn nah.
|
|
|
|
Post by ghettooverlord on Jan 28, 2007 23:05:05 GMT -5
Second, I did not watch the show Well way to be armchair booker, because if you had watched it you'd realize how well executed and dramatic it was. Go watch the Rumble and get back to me. |
|
helped $lim jinx NXT. Woops
