|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 26, 2007 22:37:00 GMT -5
My feeling is that Vince loves a suprise winner so I say CM Punk wins since he is one of the more over wrestlers in the company. Although if he wants a true shock than give it to Vladimir Kozlov. Can Kozlov defeat 49 MEN IN THE REYAL ROMBLE?! FOR DOUBLE DOUBLE E TITLE SHOT!?!
|
|
Garee
King Koopa
I miss the old days
Posts: 11,338
|
Post by Garee on Jan 26, 2007 22:54:44 GMT -5
Batista cannot beat him, the world would end
|
|
|
Post by dvy on Jan 26, 2007 23:56:03 GMT -5
'Taker wins...Vince ruins an expensive pair of pants at the thought of "two massive behemoths" battling it out for the belt.
It's Taker vs Sid 2000
|
|
nostradumbass
Tommy Wiseau
The only man to be booked in TNA and not look like a jackass
Posts: 89
|
Post by nostradumbass on Jan 27, 2007 0:07:51 GMT -5
He'll shbow us. We'll see!
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 27, 2007 0:11:21 GMT -5
|
|
HRH The KING
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS
Posts: 15,079
|
Post by HRH The KING on Jan 27, 2007 0:27:52 GMT -5
I see no need for the Undertaker to win the Rumble and the title.
How about doing something different for a change and try to make a new star by giving someone else a chance?
Just feed Taker some jabroni at Mania so he can keep his boring "WM record" intact.
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Jan 27, 2007 6:36:09 GMT -5
I see no need for the Undertaker to win the Rumble and the title. How about doing something different for a change and try to make a new star by giving someone else a chance? Just feed Taker some jabroni at Mania so he can keep his boring "WM record" intact. I second that. Minus the Mania streak... Out of his 14 wins, how many are really meaningful? I'd say we're around the 50% mark... being generous. So I really don't want to see Taker win the Rumble, let alone the title at Mania
|
|
|
Post by Austin's Middle Finger on Jan 27, 2007 7:06:15 GMT -5
I see no need for the Undertaker to win the Rumble and the title. How about doing something different for a change and try to make a new star by giving someone else a chance? Just feed Taker some jabroni at Mania so he can keep his boring "WM record" intact. I dunno... I have to side with the E for doing this match. I mean, unless they manage to pull out Hogan, Austin and the rest of the creaky knees crew, they don't have a big money match for this Mania. Batista vs Taker, no matter what you think of the men, has the potential of a big money match. Let workrate take a backseat for 20 minutes, because this has all the ingreedients of a Wrestlemania main event, something that Trips/Cena and Trips/Bats lacked. Of course, Batista breaking the streak could be the most retarded thing they could do.
|
|
|
Post by Brick Killed a Guy on Jan 27, 2007 10:04:04 GMT -5
Taker wins Rumble, then beats Batista for the title and retires "Trish Stratus style" (winning title in his last match)
Followed by WHC title tournament with semifinals and final at Judgement Day.
|
|
|
Post by dvy on Jan 27, 2007 19:18:57 GMT -5
Undertaker beat Sid for the belt at wrestlemania a decade ago+,the results would be very much the same.'Taker vs a big guy,but not a monster like Giant El Giante,Khali,etc..
|
|
|
Post by DrizzlinShytes on Jan 27, 2007 19:37:03 GMT -5
Look for them to set-up the next big sacrifice to Taker's legacy. Much like 93 the person who costs Taker the Rumble will be his victim at Mania.
|
|