Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Jan 23, 2007 11:11:57 GMT -5
TNA has one hour and utilizes 4 titles well, i dont buy that argument 4 titles? World Title X-Division Title Tag Titles Which one am I missing? He must be thinking World X Cup or something.
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Jan 23, 2007 11:17:48 GMT -5
TNA has one hour and utilizes 4 titles well, i dont buy that argument You mean by being tossed around every few months? The point is they find time for them. Tossing around titles >>> Strip Poker.
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Jan 23, 2007 11:19:38 GMT -5
I still call for the "end this brand" vote.
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Jan 23, 2007 11:26:03 GMT -5
You mean by being tossed around every few months? The point is they find time for them. Tossing around titles >>> Strip Poker. Same can be said with all the bad Eric Young and VKM skits. It isn't like the Strip Poker event happens every other ECW episode.
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Jan 23, 2007 11:28:01 GMT -5
The point is they find time for them. Tossing around titles >>> Strip Poker. Same can be said with all the bad Eric Young and VKM skits. It isn't like the Strip Poker event happens every other ECW episode. So TNA has time for three titles, a VKM promo, a PCS digital short, and some Eric Young stuff (which UNLIKE anything people try to relate it to in WWE, does relate to a genuine rivalry). What's ECW's excuse?
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Jan 23, 2007 11:32:13 GMT -5
Same can be said with all the bad Eric Young and VKM skits. It isn't like the Strip Poker event happens every other ECW episode. So TNA has time for three titles, a VKM promo, a PCS digital short, and some Eric Young stuff (which UNLIKE anything people try to relate it to in WWE, does relate to a genuine rivalry). What's ECW's excuse? Well I haven't seen the X-Division title defended on TV for a while, it seems the whole X-Division is being based off the PCS skit. Two, in TNA, not all titles are being defended every week, it seems at least one title is defended. Lastly, ECW has a thin roster, much of which is a WWE fault, and that TNA has a roster to support three titles. About Eric Young, the guy was suppose to be fired then he appears as if nothing happened. His spaz gimmick is lame and overdone and he was in a rival with Ms Brooks. It's stupid as hell.
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Jan 23, 2007 11:50:05 GMT -5
So TNA has time for three titles, a VKM promo, a PCS digital short, and some Eric Young stuff (which UNLIKE anything people try to relate it to in WWE, does relate to a genuine rivalry). What's ECW's excuse? Well I haven't seen the X-Division title defended on TV for a while, it seems the whole X-Division is being based off the PCS skit. Two, in TNA, not all titles are being defended every week, it seems at least one title is defended. Lastly, ECW has a thin roster, much of which is a WWE fault, and that TNA has a roster to support three titles. About Eric Young, the guy was suppose to be fired then he appears as if nothing happened. His spaz gimmick is lame and overdone and he was in a rival with Ms Brooks. It's stupid as hell. This is going to be a stupid argument. TNA is trying to further major storylines and build toward PPVs with just a one hour show, while ECW is little more than a glorified Heat or Velocity. They're both totally different shows.
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Jan 23, 2007 11:52:52 GMT -5
Well I haven't seen the X-Division title defended on TV for a while, it seems the whole X-Division is being based off the PCS skit. Two, in TNA, not all titles are being defended every week, it seems at least one title is defended. Lastly, ECW has a thin roster, much of which is a WWE fault, and that TNA has a roster to support three titles. About Eric Young, the guy was suppose to be fired then he appears as if nothing happened. His spaz gimmick is lame and overdone and he was in a rival with Ms Brooks. It's stupid as hell. This is going to be a stupid argument. TNA is trying to further major storylines and build toward PPVs with just a one hour show, while ECW is little more than a glorified Heat or Velocity. They're both totally different shows. Yeah, I can remember what happened on ECW last week, i can't remember more than 33% of the things that happened on iMPACT last week. Difference.
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Jan 23, 2007 11:54:55 GMT -5
This is going to be a stupid argument. TNA is trying to further major storylines and build toward PPVs with just a one hour show, while ECW is little more than a glorified Heat or Velocity. They're both totally different shows. Yeah, I can remember what happened on ECW last week, i can't remember more than 33% of the things that happened on iMPACT last week. Difference. I'm not going to defend either show. TNA has sucked since Russo took charge. ECW has sucked since the beginning.
|
|
|
Post by Cypress on Jan 23, 2007 12:05:05 GMT -5
and RAW sucks more than both of them
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Jan 23, 2007 12:14:24 GMT -5
and RAW sucks more than both of them I don't care what anyone says. Nothing sucks more than, as RD Reynolds so aptly put it, "that THING on Sci Fi."
|
|
|
Post by Seth Drakin of Monster Crap on Jan 23, 2007 12:15:35 GMT -5
We need an ECW TV Title Single Elimination Turmoil Match featuring..........Every man in ECW besides Test and Bobby Lashley.
|
|
|
Post by The"threadicidal"bristolspapa on Jan 23, 2007 12:45:51 GMT -5
I'm suing. They took my idea from last week's book ECW thread. And don't say that it was bound to happen sooner or later. Whenever A happens before B, B was caused by A. That's a scientific fact. Oh wait. Anchorman, not anchor lady is the scientific fact.
Carry on Vince. I'm sorry.
|
|