Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 17, 2007 15:40:01 GMT -5
Other - Yokozuna. Beating Bret Hart for the title just to drop it to a Hulk Hogan who was practically gone from the company already was idiocy.
|
|
Jeff
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,074
|
Post by Jeff on Jan 17, 2007 15:42:14 GMT -5
Kane is not a transitional champion as he transitioned it to the same guy.
|
|
Rockhound
Unicron
Mugger Kitty Strikes Again!
Posts: 2,956
|
Post by Rockhound on Jan 17, 2007 15:45:34 GMT -5
Other - Yokozuna. Beating Bret Hart for the title just to drop it to a Hulk Hogan who was practically gone from the company already was idiocy. Yokozuna held the title on more then one occasion. I'll give you a multiple title holder who had a reign that qualifies as transitional during the Attitude Era and that's Mankind. He won only because Ventura didn't want to count a win for a cheating face(coming from the guy who said "win if you can, lose if you must, but always cheat, but anyway..). Then Trips beat Foley the next night.
|
|
|
Post by dennisisevil on Jan 17, 2007 18:31:16 GMT -5
Edge. I think he deserved a longer run with the belt.
|
|
Rockhound
Unicron
Mugger Kitty Strikes Again!
Posts: 2,956
|
Post by Rockhound on Jan 17, 2007 18:47:43 GMT -5
Edge. I think he deserved a longer run with the belt. Again, Edge held the belt more than once.
|
|
|
Post by HevyDevy on Jan 17, 2007 18:49:43 GMT -5
Edge. I think he deserved a longer run with the belt. Again, Edge held the belt more than once. sadly both times were really short.
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Jan 17, 2007 19:03:11 GMT -5
Kane without a doubt...
He'll be remembered anyway for all the crap he's been through (and also as Undertaker's "little brother") but I think he deserved, and could still deserve, a real title reign.
I'd really like to see him win the Rumble and going against Batista (or Cena... but it's even more wishful thinking) at Mania, but we know it's not gonna happen. And it's stupid considering the lack of main eventers on both shows...
Hell, if Mysterio got a title reign (awful, I'll admit), if RVD got it (and blew it), if they had to dust off Booker T and the King gimmick, why not Kane as the Really Unstoppable Monster role???
|
|
|
Post by wrestlinggod13 on Jan 17, 2007 19:34:06 GMT -5
Flair's 2nd WWF Title reign (Sept-Oct. 92) should have been a bit longer and more eventful.
|
|
Rockhound
Unicron
Mugger Kitty Strikes Again!
Posts: 2,956
|
Post by Rockhound on Jan 17, 2007 19:41:02 GMT -5
Kane without a doubt... He'll be remembered anyway for all the crap he's been through (and also as Undertaker's "little brother") but I think he deserved, and could still deserve, a real title reign. I'd really like to see him win the Rumble and going against Batista (or Cena... but it's even more wishful thinking) at Mania, but we know it's not gonna happen. And it's stupid considering the lack of main eventers on both shows... Hell, if Mysterio got a title reign (awful, I'll admit), if RVD got it (and blew it), if they had to dust off Booker T and the King gimmick, why not Kane as the Really Unstoppable Monster role??? Because the unstoppable monster angle died when they started calling him a big red retard.
|
|