|
|
Post by Banned Member on Feb 1, 2007 19:49:24 GMT -5
I think it could work. Michaels could probably drag a better match out of Batista than 'Taker could, and a 'Taker/Cena brawl would probably be a really fun thing to watch. For once I agree with you. |
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Feb 1, 2007 20:31:29 GMT -5
Taker and Cena is an odd mix to me. I think Batista/Taker is a better mix and really would be great to see Taker beat Bats for the title, but if their gonna end Taker's streak this year then it has to be Cena/Taker because Batista has about two years left in the tank. HBK works well with everyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by T.J. "the Crippler" Stevens on Feb 1, 2007 20:57:12 GMT -5
Honestly, I'd rather see Cena Vs. Michaels. And only because it will consolidate the two of them into one match. That way, I'll only be pissed off for one match instead of two. And at least one of them would actually (  ) have to lose. If they put it on the "Free For All" on the TV Guide Channel, it'd be the best Wrestlemania ever. |
|
HRH The KING
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS
Posts: 15,079
|
Post by HRH The KING on Feb 1, 2007 20:58:10 GMT -5
I want to see Cena vs Michaels.
|
|
adamclark52
El Dandy
I'm one with the Force; the Force is with me
Posts: 8,139 
|
Post by adamclark52 on Feb 1, 2007 21:01:54 GMT -5
The thing you don't realize is would you rather it be Cena who ends the streak or Batista. Since I really hate both, but hate Batista less, I'd have to go with Batista.
|
|
) have to lose. If they put it on the "Free For All" on the TV Guide Channel, it'd be the best Wrestlemania ever.
