|
Post by MGH on Feb 9, 2007 17:48:29 GMT -5
IMPACT RATING by Mike Johnson @ 5:44:00 PM on 2/9/2007
Last night's edition of TNA Impact did a 1.1 cable rating.
-PWInsider.com
|
|
Mr.K-itty
Don Corleone
I watch Sesame Street daily
itt: post cats gogogo!!!
Posts: 1,755
|
Post by Mr.K-itty on Feb 9, 2007 18:03:35 GMT -5
so umm...is that good? i dont really undertand how the ratings point system works...iMPACT! was pretty good last night tho...
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Feb 9, 2007 18:05:34 GMT -5
so umm...is that good? i dont really undertand how the ratings point system works...iMPACT! was pretty good last night tho... For Impact, it's about the normal rating. It tends to fluctuate between 0.7 and 1.1 if I'm not mistaken.
|
|
Agent P
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wooo
Posts: 18,180
|
Post by Agent P on Feb 9, 2007 18:08:13 GMT -5
This is about as high as they get.
|
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Feb 9, 2007 18:26:55 GMT -5
Considering how Russo is screwing up booking I am impressed at the 1.1
Just to clarify ratings are predicated on the idea that 1 share = 1 household
So if 3 people watch a show at 1 house the 1.1 rating might mean that slomething less than 3 million viewers watched the show
|
|
|
Post by King of the Indies on Feb 9, 2007 18:34:53 GMT -5
Maybe Russo knows something we don't...
|
|
|
Post by tommyvercetti on Feb 9, 2007 19:47:20 GMT -5
Russo = ratings.
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie Finster on Feb 9, 2007 19:57:18 GMT -5
I heard elsewhere that it was esactly a 1.12, which is their highest rating at the 9 PM slot yet, and they did a 1.32 amongst the 18-34 males.....or something like that.
|
|
|
Post by AmericanDragon420 on Feb 9, 2007 20:50:47 GMT -5
Naw, he's killing TNA[/iwc mark]
|
|
|
Post by thwak is T.hawk on Feb 9, 2007 20:52:20 GMT -5
face it IWC, russo knows how to get people to tune into TNA and book T.V. Wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Feb 9, 2007 20:56:54 GMT -5
face it IWC, russo knows how to get people to tune into TNA and book T.V. Wrestling. Because ratings have been SOARING since he showed up? They had gotten these ratings back last summer for awhile too. He hasn't turned anything around yet.
|
|
|
Post by Jason Todd Grisham on Feb 9, 2007 21:13:11 GMT -5
They got a 1.1 once or twice last summer if I recall correctly, he's been consistant. Which is something D'amore never was able to churn out.
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Feb 9, 2007 21:19:43 GMT -5
They got a 1.1 once or twice last summer if I recall correctly, he's been consistant. Which is something D'amore never was able to churn out. I went and looked it up before I decided to post it. From April - July last year their average rating was a 1.0. They had a 0.6 and a 0.8 in there because of a midnight showing and because they had to go head to head with WWE Hall of Fame. They weren't getting 1.1 consistently now until the move to 9 PM. When Russo first showed up they continued the trend of 0.8 and such for 2 months. Sorry, I'm not giving him credit for something I'm not seeing him responsible for. And watching the show for the last month + it's hard to credit him for anything.
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Feb 9, 2007 22:08:30 GMT -5
will this be like the WSX rating the other day and will wind up being several percentage points smaller than first reported? lol
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Feb 10, 2007 12:22:23 GMT -5
As reported earlier, TNA Impact yesterday did a 1.1 rating. While Impact has done a 1.1 before, the show last night ended up drawing 1.6 million viewers, slightly edging out their previous viewer record.
Credit: PWTorch.com
|
|
|
Post by I Got Heat on Feb 10, 2007 12:41:30 GMT -5
Russo > IWC
|
|
|
Post by CrazySting on Feb 10, 2007 13:13:29 GMT -5
Impact's viewership was 1.6 million viewers compared to ECW's 1.78 million. Vince is gonna love that.
|
|
Ace Diamond
Patti Mayonnaise
Believes in Adrian Veidt, as Should We All.
mmm...flavor text
Posts: 36,043
|
Post by Ace Diamond on Feb 10, 2007 13:32:28 GMT -5
I really don't know how to read this, mostly because I feel people will watch it anyway just to see a few of the wrestlers, and not care too much about the wrestling, though to the show's credit the main event was decent. The crowd cheering for Scott Steiner beating down the faces was a bit dumb though. Seriously, just because somebody comes back it should not equal instant face pops.
|
|
|
Post by spongeboobnopants on Feb 10, 2007 16:25:58 GMT -5
I really don't know how to read this, mostly because I feel people will watch it anyway just to see a few of the wrestlers, and not care too much about the wrestling, though to the show's credit the main event was decent. The crowd cheering for Scott Steiner beating down the faces was a bit dumb though. Seriously, just because somebody comes back it should not equal instant face pops. true, but Steiner was pretty good during his last run. Had a good feud with Joe and had some good lines such as "you're a halfbreed" and "Sloppy Joe".
|
|
|
Post by G✇JI☈A on Feb 10, 2007 17:55:29 GMT -5
OK how many of the 1.6 million will buy the PPV this Sunday?
|
|