|
|
Post by cenas4dahkids on Feb 2, 2007 16:07:10 GMT -5
All of the stories are very intersting...
|
|
erisi236
Fry's dog Seymour
... enjoys the rich, smooth taste of Camels.
Not good! Not good! Not good!
Posts: 21,904
|
Post by erisi236 on Feb 2, 2007 16:09:58 GMT -5
Story lines are ok, but they have their limits. 26 minutes of stories and 8 minutes of wrestling (on a wrestling show mind you) goes way beyond my limit.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2007 16:20:43 GMT -5
I didn't absolutely HATE it, I generally try to weed out the things I liked over things I didn't, and I just found it particularly hard with this one, I still love that Jerry Lynn is wrestling again(is there some reason why he stopped? I'm really hoping this isn't just a one time return for a while and then leave us again thing), the LAX/Dudleys thing may potentially renew my interest in the Dudleys, AJ/Christian dream team.
The bad stuff in TNA's case often ends up being hilarious, the consultant storyline is a gas, like, come on Kurt figure it out!
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Feb 2, 2007 16:25:09 GMT -5
I like storyline, cause it builds characters and gives people a reason to order PPV, and gives purpose to the fights cause no one wants to see people fight each other for no damn reason. Well, not for long,anyway.
I thought the Sabin thing was done well, until the Depends, then it was stupid overkill. The LAX vid was cool, till Tenay and West kinda ruined it by shilling the 2 hour special. D-Von''s promo was cool, as well as Mitchell's. Also, the matches were entertaining, cause I'm not watching the clock for most of the match. If crap is entertaining, time is secondary.
Oh, and the Daniels vid ruled.
|
|
Chainsaw
T
A very BAD man.
It is what it is
Posts: 90,480
|
Post by Chainsaw on Feb 2, 2007 16:26:01 GMT -5
It wasn't the talkfest it was last week, but it could have been better.
Trust me, as half-baked as some of these plotlines are, they're still not as bad as some of the stuff the E's been cooking up lately.
|
|
|
|
Post by mcmahonfan85 on Feb 2, 2007 16:28:43 GMT -5
all tell you what i really liked: two days after announcing he was leaving ring of honor, samoa joe competed in a "pay-per-view caliber" match that ended in an epic three-minute no contest. this is a wonderful sign of things to come for all of joe's fans.
|
|
|
|
Post by cenas4dahkids on Feb 2, 2007 16:40:40 GMT -5
all tell you what i really liked: two days after announcing he was leaving ring of honor, samoa joe competed in a "pay-per-view caliber" match that ended in an epic three-minute no contest. this is a wonderful sign of things to come for all of joe's fans. Actually nothing would change since Roh never had free shows to begin with.... |
|
|
|
Post by mcmahonfan85 on Feb 2, 2007 16:51:12 GMT -5
all tell you what i really liked: two days after announcing he was leaving ring of honor, samoa joe competed in a "pay-per-view caliber" match that ended in an epic three-minute no contest. this is a wonderful sign of things to come for all of joe's fans. Actually nothing would change since Roh never had free shows to begin with.... i know one thing, i would rather pay $20 to see joe put on a good match that is well worth the money than to see him wrestle a "ppv caliber match" that lasts three minutes. |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Feb 2, 2007 16:52:37 GMT -5
Actually nothing would change since Roh never had free shows to begin with.... i know one thing, i would rather pay $20 to see joe put on a good match that is well worth the money than to see him wrestle a "ppv caliber match" that lasts three minutes. Joe isn't having 3 minute matches on PPV. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2007 16:53:58 GMT -5
all tell you what i really liked: two days after announcing he was leaving ring of honor, samoa joe competed in a "pay-per-view caliber" match that ended in an epic three-minute no contest. this is a wonderful sign of things to come for all of joe's fans. Actually nothing would change since Roh never had free shows to begin with.... Actually....if you have the fight network you get free ROH. I'm a very lucky boy. |
|
|
|
Post by cenas4dahkids on Feb 2, 2007 16:54:22 GMT -5
i know one thing, i would rather pay $20 to see joe put on a good match that is well worth the money than to see him wrestle a "ppv caliber match" that lasts three minutes. Joe isn't having 3 minute matches on PPV. my point... |
|
|
|
Post by MNM's Official "Fixer" on Feb 2, 2007 16:56:04 GMT -5
I enjoyed Christian Cgae last night. "Was that a whine? Did i hear a whine somewhere?" Priceless
|
|
|
|
Post by mcmahonfan85 on Feb 2, 2007 16:57:05 GMT -5
i know one thing, i would rather pay $20 to see joe put on a good match that is well worth the money than to see him wrestle a "ppv caliber match" that lasts three minutes. Joe isn't having 3 minute matches on PPV. oh yeah, you're right. by the way, didn't the match kurt angle guaranteed would be match of the year (angle vs. joe) go only 13 minutes? |
|
|
|
Post by cenas4dahkids on Feb 2, 2007 16:58:35 GMT -5
Joe isn't having 3 minute matches on PPV. oh yeah, you're right. by the way, didn't the match kurt angle guaranteed would be match of the year (angle vs. joe) go only 13 minutes? It was still a good match... |
|
|
|
Post by mcmahonfan85 on Feb 2, 2007 16:59:18 GMT -5
Joe isn't having 3 minute matches on PPV. my point... so wait, your point is we shouldn't shill out money to see a samoa joe roh match but we should shill out money to see a samoa joe tna match because impact is free? |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Feb 2, 2007 17:02:51 GMT -5
so wait, your point is we shouldn't shill out money to see a samoa joe roh match but we should shill out money to see a samoa joe tna match because impact is free? What? Who's telling you not to shill out for ROH matches with Joe? and I didn't understand the second part. |
|
|
|
Post by cenas4dahkids on Feb 2, 2007 17:04:18 GMT -5
so wait, your point is we shouldn't shill out money to see a samoa joe roh match but we should shill out money to see a samoa joe tna match because impact is free? No my point is if you wanted a 20 min samoa joe match you're going to have to pay for it(roh dvd, tna dvd, tna ppv, ect). It was always that way. Now that he's going to be tna only you'll have to give tna money insted of roh. It's roughy the same amount of money for the dvds anyway... |
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Feb 2, 2007 17:12:07 GMT -5
Joe isn't having 3 minute matches on PPV. oh yeah, you're right. by the way, didn't the match kurt angle guaranteed would be match of the year (angle vs. joe) go only 13 minutes? Kurt Angle's a @#$%ing lunatic. We already knew that. |
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Feb 2, 2007 17:13:31 GMT -5
Bottom line the show was good. Wrestling 8 minutes? You're being too critical. There was far more than 8 min on the show. Once again they only have one hour. Lets watch the 2 hour show and see how much we get along with compelling stories
|
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Feb 2, 2007 17:15:24 GMT -5
I honestly don't care how long the matches are, as long as they accomplish something and entertain me.
Granted, I haven't seen the last couple weeks of Impact, so I can't comment on those, specifically.
Now, on a pay per view or at a live show, I expect longer matches.
|
|
