Should every PPV have a World/WWE/ECW title match?

[hypnoticgenes]

A lot of PPVs last year had no main title matches. What did you think about that?

[joeman]

I say sometimes, as the main titles should be defended in the major 4 ppvs to add more credibility to it. A title match can happen in a lower ppv, but not every ppv.

[Arturo Classico]

I feel it should be defended every PPV. Title belts are rarely defended on free tv so thay should be defended on all PPV's. No Way Out dosen't bug me that much since Wrestlemania is coming up soon, but Armeggedon was just a joke! Couldn't they have at least done, Batista vs Booker vs Finlay?

[anticonscience]

I say it should however when they seem to have PPVs every other week it's just not possible. I'd prefer to have good build up to a title match than a title match just for the sake of the belt being defended

[Rocky Angle]

Not necessarily. If they have something for the champ to do that is genuinely more interesting than a title match would be, then fine. But I do like to see lots of tile defences.

[Chris Decker-The Wild Rover]

i think so, but i think there should be a PWI rankings system for every belt. like a 3rd and 4th contender kind of like there is in actual sports. it makes it nicer. and if the no. 1 contender looses he gets bumped down and the 2nd seat gets moved up.

[Cranjis McBasketball]

SummerSlam, WrestleMania, Royal Rumble all should....the rest could, but isn't as important. I'm not even a fan of Survivor Series title defenses.