Shake A Leg
Team Rocket
PLEASE DEAR GOD, LET HIM KEEP THE STREAK!
Posts: 966
|
Post by Shake A Leg on Feb 4, 2007 10:35:51 GMT -5
WrestleMania matches keep changing like some of my friends on Myspace keep changing their background layout.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2007 10:40:34 GMT -5
To me Cena-Taker is the biggest draw of all the combinations. I know the IWC will explode if Cena ends the streak. But would you rather have Batista end it?
|
|
|
Post by Psy on Feb 4, 2007 10:44:54 GMT -5
To me Cena-Taker is the biggest draw of all the combinations. I know the IWC will explode if Cena ends the streak. But would you rather have Batista end it? I'd rather that Undertaker retired with the streak intact. RIGHT FRICKIN' NOW!
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Feb 4, 2007 10:49:43 GMT -5
Taker should have his streak intact
It would be a nice way to remember him
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2007 11:05:29 GMT -5
If cena beats undertaker, it will be a huge landmark in pro wrestling history. Smarks will hate it for a while, but after time, mabe two years, It'll (or they will) go away. The moment will last forever, and I kind of think that now is the time to do it, reguardless of how many people won't understand. The IWC would've been saying the exact same thing about Andre the Giant at Wrestlemania 3, reguardless of probable years of trashing him on the Internet. But I ask, would the wrestlemania 3 match have ever been etched into stone if Andre just decided to win? No, it probably would have been forgotten 3 years later after Wrestlemania 6. It would have been viewed as the main event of Wrestlemania 3, but nothing more. Not to be an ass or anything, but all I see Hogan vs. Andre as IS the main event of WM 3. After seeing such things as F-5's and F-U's and Chokeslams on people like Big Show and Mark Henry and Umaga, its real hard to think Hogan slamming Andre was so great anymore, ESPECIALLY after the steroid cases against Hogan.
|
|
Matt Rogers
King Koopa
member is currently offline <stalking Emma Watson>
Omae wa mo shindeiru.
Posts: 11,869
|
Post by Matt Rogers on Feb 4, 2007 11:06:40 GMT -5
If cena beats undertaker, it will be a huge landmark in pro wrestling history. Smarks will hate it for a while, but after time, mabe two years, It'll (or they will) go away. The moment will last forever, and I kind of think that now is the time to do it, reguardless of how many people won't understand. The moment will last forever. Meaning I will hate it. Forever.
|
|
erik316wttn
Samurai Cop
Wrestlecrap's #1 SUNNY mark
Posts: 2,490
|
Post by erik316wttn on Feb 4, 2007 11:07:00 GMT -5
Although I think Cena/HBK would be the better match (and I think a more interesting buildup should they still have the tag straps by WM), if someone is going to end Taker's streak, I'd rather it be Cena than Batista.
Not that I want to see it end, but if it has to at least Cena will be around a while. Although he doesn't need the rub, either.
|
|
|
Post by royboy8 on Feb 4, 2007 11:15:37 GMT -5
To me Cena-Taker is the biggest draw of all the combinations. I know the IWC will explode if Cena ends the streak. But would you rather have Batista end it? IF Takers streak is ended, Cena is the only person that should do it. He's going to be around for years to come, is the top star and would really benefit down the road with the win(along with the entire company) It reminds me a lot of Hogan Andre.
|
|
Ben Wyatt
Crow T. Robot
Are You Gonna Go My Way?
I don't get it. At all. It's kind of a small horse, I mean what am I missing? Am I crazy?
Posts: 41,798
|
Post by Ben Wyatt on Feb 4, 2007 11:15:42 GMT -5
Im not believing anything I read until the actual PPV, as the card has changed about 473 times.
And if Taker loses his streak to anyone, I will vomit with rage
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2007 11:17:02 GMT -5
If cena beats undertaker, it will be a huge landmark in pro wrestling history. Smarks will hate it for a while, but after time, mabe two years, It'll (or they will) go away. The moment will last forever, and I kind of think that now is the time to do it, reguardless of how many people won't understand. The moment will last forever. Meaning I will hate it. Forever. I shall hate it also. It'll kill Cena's wrestling career. Look at the Rock beating Hogan. And that's when the Rock had reached Megastar status.
|
|
Jeff
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,074
|
Post by Jeff on Feb 4, 2007 11:20:52 GMT -5
Less let my just fly off to Calgary to buy a copy.
The MNM/Hardy thing I hope happens but with London & Kendrick and maybe the WGTT involved aswell.
|
|
|
Post by Shy Guy on Feb 4, 2007 11:24:01 GMT -5
undertaker should remain undefeated at wrestlemania
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Feb 4, 2007 11:41:32 GMT -5
If Taker was to ever lose it then i think it should be Mr Kennedy
I NEVER want it broken though
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips on Feb 4, 2007 11:49:45 GMT -5
Not to be an ass or anything, but all I see Hogan vs. Andre as IS the main event of WM 3. After seeing such things as F-5's and F-U's and Chokeslams on people like Big Show and Mark Henry and Umaga, its real hard to think Hogan slamming Andre was so great anymore, ESPECIALLY after the steroid cases against Hogan. Not to be an ass in return, but if you see Hulk vs Andre as just another WM main event...you must need glasses. Thick ones. Coke bottles.
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Feb 4, 2007 11:57:57 GMT -5
Look into the future guys and gals, if Taker would never have his streak broken then future generations of "smarks" will blindly shout about how he held everyone down and never put anyone over, the streak being their "main point."
I wouldn't mind seeing Kennedy get the nod myself, because I look at him as someone who could easily be the next Rock (Except for the fact that I don't think that the movie career would be good for him...don't know why).
If the match is Cena/Taker it builds tension on both sides of the "knowing" level. Smarks will be in near riot mode near the PPV with every little "rumor" that Cena is going to win. It would allow the WWE to use the internet to their advantage.
I don't like the idea of Michaels/Batista. I understand the whole "Michaels wants a belt and if he can't get ______'s he goes for ________'s!" but it seems sloppy. If anything I would want their to be a Michaels/Taker match to determine who gets the Wrestlemania shot and, suddenly, Randy Orton costs Michaels the match. That would lead to a resurgence of Randy's best known gimmick, The Legend Killer and build to a nice match at Mania.
That leaves me thinking that Edge could go to Smackdown to face Batista. Edge could jump, citing that his partner cost him the tag titles and claiming the John Cena was ducking him. One spear to Batista and we are building up two title matches with two streaks on the line!
|
|
Christianv2
Dennis Stamp
Wrestlecrapper since 2001
Posts: 4,279
|
Post by Christianv2 on Feb 4, 2007 11:57:59 GMT -5
I pretty sure that they said there wont be a MITB this year.
|
|
|
Post by T Vang is a HO-DADDY~! on Feb 4, 2007 12:39:25 GMT -5
Mystery is right about Cena/Taker....No matter what happens in the end, this match builds intrigue. If they went with Batista, no one in their right mind would believe they'd put a 40yr old over a 40yr old. Also, UT isn't just old school, out of the active wrestlers, he built the old school and in the old school, when you retire, you go out on your back, that's just how it is...
|
|
erik316wttn
Samurai Cop
Wrestlecrap's #1 SUNNY mark
Posts: 2,490
|
Post by erik316wttn on Feb 4, 2007 12:58:48 GMT -5
I can see WWE doing this strictly for the match quality.
Cena/Taker can be good. Cena can get it done when he really wants to, and Taker works well with smaller guys. Batista/HBK will rely pretty much on the sole talents of Shawn Michaels. Batista/Taker would be a disaster.
|
|
|
Post by tna on Feb 4, 2007 13:21:55 GMT -5
sounds interesting to me
|
|
BHB
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,778
|
Post by BHB on Feb 4, 2007 13:56:55 GMT -5
A Money In The Bank AND TLC?! Wow. Seems a bit too much to me.
|
|