Legion
Fry's dog Seymour
Amy Pond's #1 fan
Hail Hydra!
Posts: 23,380
|
Post by Legion on Feb 4, 2007 14:00:05 GMT -5
It would be a shame for Undertaker to lose to Cena simply because Cena is a big enough star without the win.
They never fed Undertaker to Rock or Austin at WM, and they were as big/bigger than Cena, so i dont see it happening in this case.
|
|
Desi
Dennis Stamp
Do Not Approve
Posts: 4,522
|
Post by Desi on Feb 4, 2007 14:11:13 GMT -5
I'll believe it when I see it.
|
|
Blindkarevik
Grimlock
Rock... Paper... Straight-edge!
I Like To <blank>
Posts: 14,343
|
Post by Blindkarevik on Feb 4, 2007 14:18:25 GMT -5
Man, I've written and re-written this post so many times, in so many different ways... trying to find justification as to why Cena/Taker is a bad idea.
However, when I really sat down to think of it..... I realized I'm writing it strickly as a huge Undertaker mark who is already mourning the loss of his Wrestlemania Win Streak to John Cena.
We all know it'll happen... it makes the most sense. Cena is being marketed as the the best parts of Hogan and Austin together, therefore he's untouchable. This year is the 20th anniversary of the Hogan/Andre match.. and since the likelihood of Hogan/Big Show is pretty much out the window, Cena/Taker is the best option.
And while I want Taker's winstreak to remain intact, as do a lot of the rest of you... or at least to not be destroyed by Cena, I think we all know that's exactly what will happen. From a booking standpoint, Taker really doesn't need another title reign at this point... it'd be nice, but it's not necessary at all. Cena, on the other hand, will actually have something to fight for at Wrestlemania... to end Taker's win streak, and to take out the last remaining threat he has for the championship.... Cena enters as the underdog, and Taker really has nothing to gain.
And although, my Undertaker markdom makes me completely blind to every bit of logic and storytelling out there, and my longstanding prerequisite for Wrestlemania still stands... (That being: let Undertaker win at WM, then job him out the rest of the year for all I care).... I have to admit, Cena victorious at Wrestlemania would be the abosolute best option.
Even if it does force me to stop watching WWE altogether for quite some time.
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Feb 4, 2007 14:22:19 GMT -5
Man, I've written and re-written this post so many times, in so many different ways... trying to find justification as to why Cena/Taker is a bad idea. However, when I really sat down to think of it..... I realized I'm writing it strickly as a huge Undertaker mark who is already mourning the loss of his Wrestlemania Win Streak to John Cena. We all know it'll happen... it makes the most sense. Cena is being marketed as the the best parts of Hogan and Austin together, therefore he's untouchable. This year is the 20th anniversary of the Hogan/Andre match.. and since the likelihood of Hogan/Big Show is pretty much out the window, Cena/Taker is the best option. And while I want Taker's winstreak to remain intact, as do a lot of the rest of you... or at least to not be destroyed by Cena, I think we all know that's exactly what will happen. From a booking standpoint, Taker really doesn't need another title reign at this point... it'd be nice, but it's not necessary at all. Cena, on the other hand, will actually have something to fight for at Wrestlemania... to end Taker's win streak, and to take out the last remaining threat he has for the championship.... Cena enters as the underdog, and Taker really has nothing to gain. And although, my Undertaker markdom makes me completely blind to every bit of logic and storytelling out there, and my longstanding prerequisite for Wrestlemania still stands... (That being: let Undertaker win at WM, then job him out the rest of the year for all I care).... I have to admit, Cena victorious at Wrestlemania would be the abosolute best option. Even if it does force me to stop watching WWE altogether for quite some time. I agree with you except for onething is he beats Taker the boos will reign worse than ever before. They're coming back and it Detriot they will be as bad as it was in Chicago. If they want to keep him face they have to have him lose. If a heel turn happens Cena will win, simple as that. I can't buy Cena beating Taker cleanly, but we'll see what happens.
|
|
Blindkarevik
Grimlock
Rock... Paper... Straight-edge!
I Like To <blank>
Posts: 14,343
|
Post by Blindkarevik on Feb 4, 2007 19:18:10 GMT -5
The boos are coming back?
I haven't watched RAW in quite a while and thought that stage had passed... gives me hope for Taker's streak.
|
|
|
Post by undertakerfan4life on Feb 4, 2007 19:35:00 GMT -5
they will never have a TLC and a Ladder match on the same card, they have never done it before
|
|