|
Post by badantoineaccid on Nov 14, 2007 2:40:29 GMT -5
well seeing as the brands are sorta mixing it up some recently (hoping it kinda stays like that), losing one set of tag titles would work. I mean I completely forgot who was tag champs on RAW for a while. Hardcore title. 24/7 rules apply. Give Heat and Velocity the TV title. Womens title can be go around each brand. Cruiserweight goes to ECW, and..... that's all I can think of. So let's bring this together now RAW,SD,ECW: Tag Titles Hardcore Womens RAW WWE Title ECW ECW Title SD World Title Heat/Velocity TV title hey! I think I did it..... (in my dream) I saved the WWE Edit: After reading it, I realized I forgot the IC and US title.... I didn't save anything. Just added more titles ...... what the smell? IT'S IMPOSSIBLE!
|
|
|
Post by Shiori C: WC Blue Moon Poster on Nov 14, 2007 8:25:42 GMT -5
I can't believe how many people want the titles to be spread among the brands or, to refine that point, how many want some titles defended across brands, and some to be brand exclusive.
Come on, either you defend them all across all the brands or you don't defend any. And none of you would give a crap about the Women's Title not being defended on Smackdown if Victoria wasn't on Smackdown.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2007 14:15:38 GMT -5
Since ECW doesn't have a secondary title, keep it on that program exclusively. The I-C & US titles stay on their respective shows.
Dump a set of tag titles, and have them defended on all shows.
WWE, World, Women's & Cruiserweight to be defended on all shows.
Well, not "all" shows. Some shows you need #1 contenders matches. Elijah Burke needs a title sometime, and his ECW title shot isn't coming anytime soon.
Give these guys something to fight over. Otherwise the belts are meaningless.
Plus, it crosses brand lines when a guy on ECW is wrestling for the Cruiserweight title and somebody like Jamie Noble comes out and screws the challenger. There's an undercard match for the next major PPV.
|
|