|
|
Post by Iheartblackpeople on Nov 19, 2007 15:53:39 GMT -5
Out of the 3 brand split rookies who have really took off to make a name for themselves (and receive heavy criticism from the IWC) who really is the best performer in the ring?
And no, theres no none of the above option.
They've all made tremendous strides in the past twelve months, but im gonna say cena probably because he has had the largest opportunity to grow (i.e. he's been main-eventing the most consistently for the longest)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2007 16:01:20 GMT -5
I think Orton is a little better out there still, but Cena is definitely the most IMPROVED of the three.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Nov 19, 2007 16:03:50 GMT -5
I hate to say it, but Cena, if only because he can FU Khali.
|
|
|
|
Post by CrazySting on Nov 19, 2007 16:09:26 GMT -5
Cena's the most improved, and has had great matches this year.
Orton's had great matches this year too, and his selling is awesome.
Batista...he's had good matches so he's obviously not clueless, but a lot of the time it's taker doing most of the work.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Nov 19, 2007 16:15:18 GMT -5
Orton is a better seller, has better in-ring physchology than Cena. Cena can attract the fans better and more athletic than Orton(despite being a fireman's carry, I doubt anyone save a few can FU Khali).
Batista is out of place in this list imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheMediocreWarrior on Nov 19, 2007 16:33:30 GMT -5
Going with Orton. The chinlocks kind of grow on you after a while.
|
|
Jeff
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,074
|
Post by Jeff on Nov 19, 2007 17:10:00 GMT -5
Orton
|
|
|
|
Post by Real Folk Bruce on Nov 19, 2007 17:15:54 GMT -5
Cena,because he's had some good matches this year,and his years in
OVW and UPW were awesome.Cena is an excellent wrestler,he only
limits his moves to fit the rapper brawler persona.
Ortons good too,but he isn't as athletic as Cena.But Orton has more
psychology.
And Batista can have good matches too,but he has to be carried by the
guy he's fighting.
|
|
|
|
Post by valiens on Nov 19, 2007 17:24:51 GMT -5
Orton because I like his stomp better than cena's throwing fists. His headlocks are growing on me too and I like his in-ring acting better. He really does look like a pit viper.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,940
|
Post by Mozenrath on Nov 19, 2007 17:57:03 GMT -5
Orton is good, but Cena just oozes energy. Cena edges it out.
I love that no one has voted for Big Dave.
|
|
|
|
Post by VRM: LET'S GO BLUESHIRTS!! on Nov 19, 2007 18:22:02 GMT -5
AS much as I hate to vote for him, Cena.
He definitely has more growth potential than Orton...and Batista is....well....Batista...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2007 18:24:13 GMT -5
Cena definately. Orton is ok, Batista is... Batista. Cena has made huge leaps forward... all Orton does well imo is selling
|
|
|
|
Post by acressl on Nov 19, 2007 18:24:40 GMT -5
Cena. Orton comes close, but he seems too inconsistent still. Plus, there's a few things he still must learn. Batista's not even on the radar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Branimal on Nov 19, 2007 18:42:32 GMT -5
The only reason I selected Cena is because of Orton's total lack of charisma over the last few years. He's literally turning into a robot.
Honestly, I've only enjoyed Batista in his matches with DA UNDATAKAH! Other than that..he seems pretty useless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bishblast on Nov 19, 2007 18:44:54 GMT -5
If we're gonna base this one good matches each has had, it'd be Cena by a landslide.
Cena can sell well, has pretty good intensity, and great crowd psychology, but is weak in his offense and has little in the way of scientific skill.
Orton sells alright, has a decent offense, and good ring psychology, but is unable to connect with a crowd, has little to no intensity, and just slightly more technical skill than Cena.
Batista has great matches with certain people, can show great intensity, and decent crowd psychology, but also has a very weak offense, a very poor seller and bumper, and next to no technical skill.
I've gotta go with Cena, honestly, here. The only glaring negative I can say about his in ring performances is that he has the tendency to look clumsy or akward. Otherwise, a very solid in ring performer who is able to take it to the 4 star level with many opponents.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Oates' Moustache on Nov 19, 2007 18:59:39 GMT -5
I'm gonna say Batista, because he's...............
No I can't pull this off, it's too silly. His name on that poll has to be some sort of joke, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by CrazySting on Nov 19, 2007 19:19:40 GMT -5
To be fair to Batista, he makes a little go a long way. Taker isn't talented enough to carry anyoe to a good match (Khali and Mark Henry prove that) so obviously Dave has some talent. Not much, mind you. But some.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2007 19:21:15 GMT -5
ROFL @ no Batista votes
|
|
|
|
Post by Fruity Delicious Skittles on Nov 19, 2007 19:48:00 GMT -5
Cena. Orton comes close, but he seems too inconsistent still. Plus, there's a few things he still must learn. Batista's not even on the radar. You mind telling us what you know that, according to you, Orton doesn't? |
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Nov 19, 2007 20:21:43 GMT -5
Cena consistently puts on better matches, thus he gets my vote.
|
|
