|
Post by ChitownKnight on Dec 1, 2007 19:58:10 GMT -5
who do you think should beat Ric Flair. I want either Mr. Kennedy to break the streak at the Royal Rumble (So he can face Jericho at Wrestlemania) or Jeff Hardy to beat Flair at Wrestlemania.
|
|
|
Post by Feargus McReddit on Dec 1, 2007 20:13:24 GMT -5
Mickie James.
What?
|
|
|
Post by machinegun on Dec 1, 2007 20:14:24 GMT -5
Hogan
|
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Dec 1, 2007 20:21:40 GMT -5
I'd rather it be someone who we haven't seen beat him 100 times.
MVP? Punk? Morrison? Rhodes? Smith? There's no one name that I think of and go "yeah, should be him!"
It'll probably be something uninteresting to me like Batista, HHH, or ...Vince.
If I had to guess on who it will be... probably, HBK. The Vince/HBK "feud" from a month or two ago remained unresolved and was full of cryptic statements from Vince. Then that Flair/HBK interaction on Raw backstage seemed a little odd as well.
|
|
|
Post by Woooooolhouse! on Dec 1, 2007 20:22:59 GMT -5
David Flair.
|
|
|
Post by RedSmile on Dec 1, 2007 20:27:05 GMT -5
It'll end up being Hornswaggle, you know its true....
If I were booking though, it'd be CM Punk
|
|
|
Post by DASH 243✅ on Dec 1, 2007 20:27:33 GMT -5
El Dandy He doubted him AND LOST!
|
|
|
Post by skiller on Dec 1, 2007 20:28:14 GMT -5
Just about anyone who's not named McMahon.
|
|
|
Post by poi zen rana on Dec 1, 2007 20:33:42 GMT -5
ever since someone on this board mentioned the idea of him passing on the nature boy gimmick i have been hoping they run a program like that with burke.
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Dec 1, 2007 20:44:00 GMT -5
I'd rather it be someone who we haven't seen beat him 100 times. So it must be somebody who hasn't yet debuted on WWE TV Seriously, I don't know... Does it matter anyway? Flair has lost to a lot of people, and I doubt this is his last run anyway, so whoever defeats him, I bet we'll see Ric Flair again quite soon.
|
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Dec 1, 2007 20:49:05 GMT -5
I'd rather it be someone who we haven't seen beat him 100 times. So it must be somebody who hasn't yet debuted on WWE TV Pretty much. Or people who debuted in the past year or two. Flair has been beaten silly by pretty much every single main event level guy, and a lot of the upper-card as well.
|
|
|
Post by MNM's Official "Fixer" on Dec 1, 2007 20:51:01 GMT -5
If Flair really does plan on retiring, he should lose to someone who could the rub. An up and coming star.
Not someone who's been around the block a ton of times. (I'm looking at you, Trips).
|
|
|
Post by supercheese on Dec 1, 2007 20:53:55 GMT -5
You'd want to put Flair out ontop, so how about a match that if Flair loses he leaves, he wins but next night on raw says he thinks his time has past and it's time to let it go and he walks away ontop...kinda.
|
|
|
Post by lmagicdancer1 on Dec 1, 2007 20:54:53 GMT -5
I think a good final match for flair would be against shawn or sting. We probably won't have more of a hint until after this monday, though.
|
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Dec 1, 2007 20:56:01 GMT -5
You'd want to put Flair out ontop, so how about a match that if Flair loses he leaves, he wins but next night on raw says he thinks his time has past and it's time to let it go and he walks away ontop...kinda. Flair just said he is Not going to retire until he DIES IN THE RING. So him coming out and saying he's done is not exactly in his character.
|
|
|
Post by supercheese on Dec 1, 2007 20:58:29 GMT -5
You'd want to put Flair out ontop, so how about a match that if Flair loses he leaves, he wins but next night on raw says he thinks his time has past and it's time to let it go and he walks away ontop...kinda. Flair just said he is Not going to retire until he DIES IN THE RING. So him coming out and saying he's done is not exactly in his character. Wrestlemania is four months away...WWE and continuity ya know
|
|
mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319
|
Post by mrjl on Dec 1, 2007 20:58:34 GMT -5
Now isn't the time to decide who should beat him, because whoever beats him should lose a match or two first and have a storyline built behind it.
|
|
marvelocity
Unicron
At last
Posts: 3,440
Member is Online
|
Post by marvelocity on Dec 1, 2007 20:59:11 GMT -5
If this was WCW, he would lose to Vince Russo.
But then he probably would be back a few weeks later, and nothing would be mentioned about the retirement stipulation.
|
|
|
Post by MiLo Duck on Dec 1, 2007 21:01:42 GMT -5
I think the whole thing should culminate in a match where it is title vs his "fired if you lose" status. Which ofcourse results in Ric Flair as champ, then if he actually wants to retire, retires champ.
|
|
|
Post by x on Dec 1, 2007 21:04:55 GMT -5
Pssh. Ric Flair lost his retirement match to Mr. Perfect the night after Royal Rumble 1993.
|
|