|
Post by -Lithium- on May 29, 2008 23:07:17 GMT -5
Alright me and my friend have been having this ongoing argument for about two years now.
We were talking about how its weird that wrestlers wear tights. He said that if he wore them he would wear "loose tights". And I said those would be pants and theres no such thing as loose tights.
Im right, right?
|
|
Phosphor Glow
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Is a real girl!
Posts: 19,873
|
Post by Phosphor Glow on May 29, 2008 23:13:52 GMT -5
Well, loose tights is a contradiction in and of itself anyway.
But yeah, if they were "loose tights" they'd just be loose-fitting spandex pants.
|
|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on May 29, 2008 23:14:46 GMT -5
What about superheroes wearing tights?
|
|
|
Post by Maidpool w/ Cleaning Action on May 29, 2008 23:15:10 GMT -5
No, it's not weird, because in kayfabe world anything baggy would give your oppenent something else to grab onto and use against you.
That's why Greco-Roman wrestlers have tights, and usually have short hair.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Wonderful on May 29, 2008 23:15:44 GMT -5
Yep. They're called pants.
|
|
default
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Blames Everything On Snitsky. Yes, Even THAT.
Posts: 17,056
|
Post by default on May 29, 2008 23:24:01 GMT -5
loose tights can only be worn by jumbo shrimps.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Wonderful on May 29, 2008 23:26:16 GMT -5
loose tights can only be worn by jumbo shrimps. And loose lips Might sink ships But loose gooses Take trips To San Fransisco Double-dutch disco Tech TV hottie Do it for Scottie!
|
|
damna
Don Corleone
Sorry Anderson Silva, but Fedor is still number 1!
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by damna on May 29, 2008 23:27:42 GMT -5
a Gi is the only thing I can think of that would even come close to the term "loose tights"
Oh, and you are not allowed to pull hair in Greco-Roman wrestling lol.
|
|
|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on May 29, 2008 23:30:16 GMT -5
They should go back to the old days when guys used to wrestle nekkid. That way, they won't have to worry about pulling tights. But I guess they would have to worry about pulling something else. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on May 29, 2008 23:30:22 GMT -5
NOT what I thought this thread would be about.
|
|
|
Post by Rob's No. 1 Fan on May 29, 2008 23:49:13 GMT -5
Wrong.
Tights are called tights because of their style, not their condition. In reverse - if someone shrunk a pair of regular pants, should we suddenly call them tights?
A balloon is still a "balloon" even after it pops (and no longer 'balloons'). But then we make sure we clarify by saying "popped balloon".
So I guess it's fair to change tights (that aint tight no more) to "loose-tights".
.
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on May 29, 2008 23:51:58 GMT -5
We don't have loose tights at the Palace of Wisdom.
|
|
damna
Don Corleone
Sorry Anderson Silva, but Fedor is still number 1!
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by damna on May 29, 2008 23:53:15 GMT -5
We don't have loose tights at the Palace of Wisdom. Because you have no fatties to stretch them out?
|
|
|
Post by Rob's No. 1 Fan on May 30, 2008 19:32:09 GMT -5
wait a sec... dammit... this is buggin me now...
Ok, so I thought about it some more.. and... I think its like this...
... when we talk about things in the past... the former... the now defunct... the kapoot... we gotta still identify it. Like the dude who runs up to his tornado strewn house and yells, "My house!!" - which is actually just a big pile of crap now. So what he should really do is run up and yell, "My big pile of crap!!"
.. wait, no ... ok.. or like..
When we say "former president Clinton" - he aint no president or nothing. But we still clarify his identity but modify it with description. So I guess "loose tights" maybe should be changed to "former tights", or just... "tights that ain't" ... or, hell... maybe just call them "looses".
i dunno. damn.
.
|
|
Dirty Hazy
Hank Scorpio
Pictured Above: The Future Mrs. Hazy
Posts: 5,008
|
Post by Dirty Hazy on May 30, 2008 20:05:10 GMT -5
NOT what I thought this thread would be about. Do I even WANT to know what you thought it'd be about?
|
|