Who interviews for RF Video?

[Gillberg: 0-175]

He sucks. He lowers his voice and trips over his lines towards the end of a question. It's like "VINCE RUSSO, HOW WAS IT BOOKING WCW? I mean because at th-th-end it was likeandyeah..."

[Hiroshi Hase]

Whoever it is doesn't seem to know their wrestling, as when he was interviewing Hall and Nash, and said how cool it would've been if they faced each other, and Nash had to correct him and say that they did feud in WCW.

And that he didn't know that Bret beat Nash at Survivor Series in 95.

I mean, I get that you can't know everything but it helps before you interview the person to watch some footage or read up on them so you don't sound flustered when you interview them.

[mcmahonfan85]

yjc1019 said:

Whoever it is doesn't seem to know their wrestling, as when he was interviewing Hall and Nash, and said how cool it would've been if they faced each other, and Nash had to correct him and say that they did feud in WCW.

so is that the Kevin Nash shoot interview everyone is always talking about, saying its so good? cause when ever i try to find his shoot it always is this really crappy one done by Scott Hudson, and if that is was people call "good" they're a bunch of idiots. i mean this thing goes into great detail about his career. "Question 6: What was it like forming the nWo at Bash at the Beach? Question 7: Talk about the reformation of the nWo in January 1999 Question 8: What was it like coming back to WWE in 2002?" (also at one point it seems like Hudson hasn't caught on that WWE kicked WCW ass and put them out of business)

[Hiroshi Hase]

mcmahonfan85 said:

yjc1019 said:

Whoever it is doesn't seem to know their wrestling, as when he was interviewing Hall and Nash, and said how cool it would've been if they faced each other, and Nash had to correct him and say that they did feud in WCW.

so is that the Kevin Nash shoot interview everyone is always talking about, saying its so good? cause when ever i try to find his shoot it always is this really crappy one done by Scott Hudson, and if that is was people call "good" they're a bunch of idiots. i mean this thing goes into great detail about his career. "Question 6: What was it like forming the nWo at Bash at the Beach? Question 7: Talk about the reformation of the nWo in January 1999 Question 8: What was it like coming back to WWE in 2002?" (also at one point it seems like Hudson hasn't caught on that WWE kicked WCW ass and put them out of business)

Oh god no, that one was horrible, I got that for like 3 or 4 dollars at an ROH show a few years back.

This one is a bit better, but I preferred Hall's as he seemed very open in conversation.

Hall and Nash also do a shoot together and it's somewhat entertaining, but honestly they ask the same questions they asked Hall on the singles shoot, like "Did you find it difficult to work with Hogan?" or "How were you treated when you came back to WWE in 2002?"

[jordenisgood]

Not sure if he does them all, but the owner of RF Video and former ROH owner Rob Feinstein usually conducts the interviews.

[Bobby Womack]

the pedo has done a lot of the interviews but i dont think the OP is referring to him, because despite being a child rapist he does seem to know his wrestling

[Hiroshi Hase]

rs2t said:

the pedo has done a lot of the interviews but i dont think the OP is referring to him, because despite being a child rapist he does seem to know his wrestling

Perhaps it was someone else, because the person I heard on the Hall/Nash shoot didn't sound like they knew certain things about the guys they were interviewing.

[jordenisgood]

rs2t said:

the pedo has done a lot of the interviews but i dont think the OP is referring to him, because despite being a child rapist he does seem to know his wrestling

I love the blind hate for Rob Feinstein who was found INNOCENT of the charges and the supposid "real" chat log that can be found online, was proven to be doctored by the state appointed computer analyst who checked his computer and phone.

But either way, I guess he'll never live it down.

[dewe]

jordenisgood said:

rs2t said:

the pedo has done a lot of the interviews but i dont think the OP is referring to him, because despite being a child rapist he does seem to know his wrestling

I love the blind hate for Rob Feinstein who was found INNOCENT of the charges and the supposid "real" chat log that can be found online, was proven to be doctored by the state appointed computer analyst who checked his computer and phone.

But either way, I guess he'll never live it down.

But why did he show up at the house?

[Mr. Mediocre]

jordenisgood said:

rs2t said:

the pedo has done a lot of the interviews but i dont think the OP is referring to him, because despite being a child rapist he does seem to know his wrestling

I love the blind hate for Rob Feinstein who was found INNOCENT of the charges and the supposid "real" chat log that can be found online, was proven to be doctored by the state appointed computer analyst who checked his computer and phone.

But either way, I guess he'll never live it down.

Considering that a. he wasn't charged at all and b. this is the first I've heard that the chat log was doctored and, of course c. he went to the house regardless, I'm going to say that you don't have your facts entirely straight.

[jordenisgood]

A. He was charged but never actually prosecuted because it was bullshit.
B. Maybe you didn't hear everything, which could explain why you didn't know the chat log had been doctored.
C. He did go to the house, because he was under the impression that the person living there who was willing to engage in sexual activity was of age, and male.

So that makes him gay, sure... but everyone already knew that. Point remains, the chat log that was released, was fake to some degree (doctored to make the person in question a minor). I'm sorry that you've not heard of that part. Maybe you didn't look it up? Maybe it didn't appear on the newsite that you visit? I don't know. I didn't know of the incidient until well after it happened, and when I did look up information the fact the chat log was doctored is one of the things I found.

I don't know what you are referring to with "he wasn't charged?" does that mean he wasn't found guilty? Because, no he was not. He was on the other hand taken into custody and had charges against him for the attempted sexual exploiation of a male minor, but all charges were eventually dropped.

So yeah...

[jordenisgood]

And I should make it known ... no, I'm not Rob Feinstein, lol.

[Mr. Mediocre]

jordenisgood said:

A. He was charged but never actually prosecuted because it was bullcrap.
B. Maybe you didn't hear everything, which could explain why you didn't know the chat log had been doctored.
C. He did go to the house, because he was under the impression that the person living there who was willing to engage in sexual activity was of age, and male.

So that makes him gay, sure... but everyone already knew that. Point remains, the chat log that was released, was fake to some degree (doctored to make the person in question a minor). I'm sorry that you've not heard of that part. Maybe you didn't look it up? Maybe it didn't appear on the newsite that you visit? I don't know. I didn't know of the incidient until well after it happened, and when I did look up information the fact the chat log was doctored is one of the things I found.

I don't know what you are referring to with "he wasn't charged?" does that mean he wasn't found guilty? Because, no he was not. He was on the other hand taken into custody and had charges against him for the attempted sexual exploiation of a male minor, but all charges were eventually dropped.

So yeah...

Let's see:

1. The only place that I've ever seen anyone claim that the chat log was altered was DOI. Given that they adore Rob Feinstein and are all about discrediting anything remotely related to the current ROH product, I'm disinclined to believe anything they say. It should also be noted that Feinstein used to work for them (and might still work there), so of course there's no conflict of interest there.

2. It's been four years since the incident and yet I can't find any place besides DOI that's ever argued the chat doctoring. This also isn't mentioned on Perverted Justice's wikipedia page (though it is noted that there used to be potential for it prior to safeguarding) or on Rob Feinstein's page. If it was doctored and was apparently common knowlede four years ago, it would be up there. It should also be noted that if Perverted Justice went to all the trouble of doctoring chats and ruined innocent people's lives, they'd no longer be in operation. Seriously.

And I should note that if I were entrapped by a group that ruined my life by doctoring chat logs, I'd almost certainly sue the everloving crap out of that group.

3. I mean he wasn't charged. He wasn't found guilty because the cops never charged him. He wasn't charged because there were no cops there. He wasn't found innocent, either. PJ didn't get their first conviction until after the incident. But hey, spin it how you want:

In March 2004, Rob Feinstein was caught in an internet sting designed to catch sexual predators (set up by Perverted-Justice.com). Feinstein, who believed he was talking to a 14 year old boy, claimed he was a wrestler with Pro Wrestling Guerrilla and eventually asked the boy if he could meet him at his home later, having implied in the chat that he was considering the boy's offer for sex.[2] When Feinstein arrived at the home, he was met by a news crew. Although no formal charges were ever brought against him by police, the incident proved to be disastrous publicity for both Ring of Honor and Feinstein. It caused a temporary split with Total Nonstop Action Wrestling, the cancellation of an upcoming show in Glen Burnie, Maryland[3] , and eventually resulted in Feinstein selling his share of Ring of Honor.

EDIT: All of that said...if you can find any place that isn't DOI that alleges that Perverted-Justice doctored the Feinstein chats, I'd like you to link it up. I've been wrong before and am certainly man enough to admit when I'm wrong.