Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Mar 16, 2008 1:58:39 GMT -5
I dont like triple threats or fatal forways for the main event at Wrestlemania. It should be one on one. It should be the two most over guys on the roster for the WWE title. If WWE was perfect every year there would be a rivalry like Austin vs Rock.
Whats your idea of a perfect WWE?
|
|
Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Mar 16, 2008 2:05:53 GMT -5
One where Eddie, Owen and scores of others hadn't died. Austin hadn't hurt his neck. And The Rock didn't go to Hollywood. I would have loved to see many stars who were never in their prime at the same time...be in their primes at the same time. I have to disagree with you on the Rock not going to Hollywood. In my eyes The Rock is a hero to wrestling fans, or at least he should be. The Rock and Stone Cold where the only guys I know that could control the audience like they did. Plus what else can the Rock do if he stayed anyways? He's been 7 times WWE champion. I just wished he would return once every year or something. |
|
|
|
Post by WWE Trademarked My Name on Mar 16, 2008 2:23:27 GMT -5
I think Austin controlled audiences a whole lot better than The Rock, when the Rock was on fire he had them in the palm of his hands when he didn't... well watch Rock/Lesnar and Rock/Hogan.
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Mar 16, 2008 2:28:38 GMT -5
|
|
damna
Don Corleone
Sorry Anderson Silva, but Fedor is still number 1!
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by damna on Mar 16, 2008 2:29:26 GMT -5
-A viable cruiserweight division
- Less predictable outcomes
- A viable US & IC title picture
- A competitve tag team divison
- Paul Heyman on commentary
- Snitsky!
|
|
greeby
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,088
|
Post by greeby on Mar 16, 2008 2:36:44 GMT -5
One which presumes I have a memory (As you may have noticed, those recaps really grind my gears)
One with less PPVs and thus more time to really build a fued
One that accepts that certain folks are never gonna get a pop so they shouldn't be pushed again and again.
One where the tag-teams mean something
One where, if you're gonna base your women's division around pretty girls, fine. Just make sure they're either a good worker or have the passion needed to become one. Don't wave a quarter of a million out there and expect to get women who care enough to pick up the business. Oh, and accept that looks alone don't translate into being over. (see Massaro, Ashley and McCool, Michelle)
That's all I can think of right now
|
|
|
|
Post by Mister Yummy on Mar 16, 2008 3:30:36 GMT -5
Onw with one weekly live show and one weekly segment show(Ala Prime Time Wrestling), as well as weekend morning syndicated shows featuring mostly jobber squashes.
One with only one "Brand".
One without McMahons being pushed down my throat every week.
One where you never see the on-screen athority figure, unless something BIG is happenening. Said figure should be entirely neutral in terms of face/heel alignment, never play favorites, and be as fair as possible.
One where non-titles matches almost never happen.
One where titles aren't hot-shotted around month after month.
One with a women's division that means something, as opposed to useless filler. They've got Victoria and Beth Pheonix. Find 5 or 10 more girls like that, and you're set!
One with less PPV's
One with less expensive PPV's
One that tours in my area more often.
One that keeps kayfabe, at all costs.
One where wrestling trumps entertainment.
One where they get the 'F' back in.
I could keep going...
|
|
Marvelously Mediocre
Fry's dog Seymour
Beggin' for a little SWAGGAH!
Haha. What a story Mark.
Posts: 21,224
|
Post by Marvelously Mediocre on Mar 16, 2008 8:44:47 GMT -5
One where titles aren't hot-shotted around month after month. there's hardly ever a title change nowadays |
|
erik316wttn
Samurai Cop
Wrestlecrap's #1 SUNNY mark
Posts: 2,490
|
Post by erik316wttn on Mar 16, 2008 8:46:52 GMT -5
The very first thing I'd change is having the WWE and WHC titles change hands on TV every so often. Not all the time, but it would at least make main events in which the champion defends the title on TV less predictable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citizen Snips on Mar 16, 2008 8:52:00 GMT -5
Stevie Richards: WWE Champion
|
|
greeby
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,088
|
Post by greeby on Mar 16, 2008 9:05:38 GMT -5
One with a women's division that means something, as opposed to useless filler. They've got Victoria and Beth Pheonix. Find 5 or 10 more girls like that, and you're set! They had that in OVW a year or so ago, a couple moved up, a lot left for other companies. Besides, if you go out and sign 5 women like Beth, she's not gonna seem very impressive, now is she? |
|
pacino
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,504
|
Post by pacino on Mar 16, 2008 13:23:41 GMT -5
Onw with one weekly live show and one weekly segment show(Ala Prime Time Wrestling), as well as weekend morning syndicated shows featuring mostly jobber squashes. One with only one "Brand". One without McMahons being pushed down my throat every week. One where you never see the on-screen athority figure, unless something BIG is happenening. Said figure should be entirely neutral in terms of face/heel alignment, never play favorites, and be as fair as possible. One where non-titles matches almost never happen. One where titles aren't hot-shotted around month after month. One with a women's division that means something, as opposed to useless filler. They've got Victoria and Beth Pheonix. Find 5 or 10 more girls like that, and you're set! One with less PPV's One with less expensive PPV's One that tours in my area more often. One that keeps kayfabe, at all costs. One where wrestling trumps entertainment. One where they get the 'F' back in. I could keep going... they would lose a lot of profit in your WWE |
|
metylerca
King Koopa
Loves Him Some Backstreet Boys.
Don't be alarmed.
Posts: 12,479
|
Post by metylerca on Mar 16, 2008 13:29:07 GMT -5
Onw with one weekly live show and one weekly segment show(Ala Prime Time Wrestling), as well as weekend morning syndicated shows featuring mostly jobber squashes. One with only one "Brand". One without McMahons being pushed down my throat every week. One where you never see the on-screen athority figure, unless something BIG is happenening. Said figure should be entirely neutral in terms of face/heel alignment, never play favorites, and be as fair as possible. One where non-titles matches almost never happen. One where titles aren't hot-shotted around month after month. One with a women's division that means something, as opposed to useless filler. They've got Victoria and Beth Pheonix. Find 5 or 10 more girls like that, and you're set! One with less PPV's One with less expensive PPV's One that tours in my area more often. One that keeps kayfabe, at all costs. One where wrestling trumps entertainment. One where they get the 'F' back in. I could keep going... WWEROH? |
|
|
|
Post by robferatu on Mar 16, 2008 13:40:12 GMT -5
I was all for Cena vs. Hardy, but thankfully they didn't decide to go that route.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrestlecrapcrap on Mar 16, 2008 15:46:18 GMT -5
Onw with one weekly live show and one weekly segment show(Ala Prime Time Wrestling), as well as weekend morning syndicated shows featuring mostly jobber squashes. One with only one "Brand". One without McMahons being pushed down my throat every week. One where you never see the on-screen athority figure, unless something BIG is happenening. Said figure should be entirely neutral in terms of face/heel alignment, never play favorites, and be as fair as possible. One where non-titles matches almost never happen. One where titles aren't hot-shotted around month after month. One with a women's division that means something, as opposed to useless filler. They've got Victoria and Beth Pheonix. Find 5 or 10 more girls like that, and you're set! One with less PPV's One with less expensive PPV's One that tours in my area more often. One that keeps kayfabe, at all costs. One where wrestling trumps entertainment. One where they get the 'F' back in. I could keep going... The Mcmahons haven't been 'shoved down our throats' for ages now. And what was that about the titles? Personally I'd like more Wrestlemania's to be like 21, where stars are created, although I appreciate that this can't happen every year, as you can't keep changing your top guy because otherwise it stops having meaning and it gives no top guy a chance to stake their claim and be an influence in the company. I just think of those kind of Manias as the perfect ones though, because it's always good to watch a new star born. |
|
|
|
Post by stevierichardsfan on Mar 16, 2008 16:10:12 GMT -5
better tag divison
|
|
|
|
Post by The Thread Barbi on Mar 16, 2008 16:19:45 GMT -5
Well played, sir, well played. |
|
|
|
Post by Shy Guy on Mar 16, 2008 16:36:49 GMT -5
one where torrie wilson isn't employed. or ashley. or maryse.
also, no diva search.
|
|
|
|
Post by Real Folk Bruce on Mar 16, 2008 16:41:06 GMT -5
I'll leave it just as it is. WWE has and always will be the most entertaining wrestling promotion of all time.
|
|
Bo Rida
Fry's dog Seymour
Pulled one over on everyone.
Got away with it, this time.
Posts: 23,699
Member is Online
|
Post by Bo Rida on Mar 16, 2008 17:30:26 GMT -5
I think WM17 is as close as we'll ever get.
However if it was prefect we wouldn't be able to moan and then this site would be shut down and we'll all be sad.
|
|
