|
|
Post by Gopher Mod on Jan 2, 2009 11:12:30 GMT -5
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,294
|
Post by Push R Truth on Jan 2, 2009 11:13:07 GMT -5
This helps support my theory that Morrison and Miz are the " Sexy Meat and Potatoes" of WWE Programming.
|
|
|
|
Post by blef on Jan 2, 2009 11:15:33 GMT -5
The latter. This one is just focusing on TV. The other thread is everything. |
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on Jan 2, 2009 12:08:04 GMT -5
Didn't Punk wrestle the most matches/have the most wins last year?
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Jan 2, 2009 12:11:59 GMT -5
So for my complaints about how Mickie sometimes doesn't get used on RAW, she's in the Top 5 for matches and wins. And equal to Beth on both.
|
|
Marvelously Mediocre
Fry's dog Seymour
Beggin' for a little SWAGGAH!
Haha. What a story Mark.
Posts: 21,224
|
Post by Marvelously Mediocre on Jan 2, 2009 12:14:48 GMT -5
so Punk's actually the biggest winner in WWE. more than TRIPLE H! and people still say he's not used right.
|
|
Agent P
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wooo
Posts: 18,180
|
Post by Agent P on Jan 2, 2009 13:44:22 GMT -5
Didn't Punk wrestle the most matches/have the most wins last year? As the person who did it last year...yes. |
|
Agent P
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wooo
Posts: 18,180
|
Post by Agent P on Jan 2, 2009 18:47:02 GMT -5
As the person who did it last year...yes. You did this last year? It's tough to keep up with, but interesting, nonetheless. It was insane. I'll find it and link it. |
|
|
|
Post by parder on Jan 2, 2009 19:33:14 GMT -5
so Punk's actually the biggest winner in WWE. more than TRIPLE H! and people still say he's not used right. But he's also 5th highest for losses, he's just been in a lot more matches than Triple H on TV at least (when you include house shows Triple H's total is a lot higher). In fact on Raw in 2008, he won only 50% of his matches. I think it's just a case that while he's clearly over enough to be booked in a lot of matches, he's not booked to be dominant. But that's not always such a bad thing when you consider the mixed reception Triple H has gotten amongst the IWC over the years. Punk's position in the storylines of 2008 has generally as the plucky, chasing babyface, and even when he was world champion, he was the underdog trying to prove himself to rest of the established main eventers, so it's not uncommon for someone like that in traditional WWE booking to have an almost 50-50 record. As long as he remains high in the babyface hierarchy, he'll have ups and downs before triumphing over the heel foe in the end. On the other hand he may be the lower order babyface who the heel conquers to gain heat for a money match with a higher up babyface. Punk has probably played both roles at times this year, but mostly the former. |
|
Lara
Don Corleone
IS A SWEETHEART
Posts: 1,292
|
Post by Lara on Jan 2, 2009 19:42:52 GMT -5
so Punk's actually the biggest winner in WWE. more than TRIPLE H! and people still say he's not used right. But he's also 5th highest for losses, he's just been in a lot more matches than Triple H on TV at least (when you include house shows Triple H's total is a lot higher). In fact on Raw in 2008, he won only 50% of his matches. I think it's just a case that while he's clearly over enough to be booked in a lot of matches, he's not booked to be dominant. But that's not always such a bad thing when you consider the mixed reception Triple H has gotten amongst the IWC over the years. Punk's position in the storylines of 2008 has generally as the plucky, chasing babyface, and even when he was world champion, he was the underdog trying to prove himself to rest of the established main eventers, so it's not uncommon for someone like that in traditional WWE booking to have an almost 50-50 record. As long as he remains high in the babyface hierarchy, he'll have ups and downs before triumphing over the heel foe in the end. On the other hand he may be the lower order babyface who the heel conquers to gain heat for a money match with a higher up babyface. Punk has probably played both roles at times this year, but mostly the former. Yeah, this. I think most people (aside from those who genuinely believe he's being buried) would agree that creative book him pretty carefully to remain credible, but not dominant. I think they've learned from the backlash to the Supercena push that booking someone to constantly go over everyone - even if they were originally pretty over - backfires pretty quickly. They've been careful to protect Punk (look at how he dropped the title, for example) so as not to kill his credibility, and he's had some great matches this year, but they've by no means booked him as unbeatable; and I do think that's because they're wary of giving him a superpush. It'll be interesting to see where they go with him in 2009, though. |
|
Agent P
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wooo
Posts: 18,180
|
Post by Agent P on Jan 2, 2009 20:13:01 GMT -5
2007's TV StandingsAnd this is a condensed version... Most Number Of Overall Wins: 1. C.M. Punk: 48 2. Jeff Hardy: 44 3. Batista: 39 4. Matt Hardy: 38 5. Kane: 33 Most Number Of Tag Team Wins: 1. The Highlanders: 16 2. Lance Cade & Trevor Murdoch: 15 T-3. Paul London & Brian Kendrick: 13 T-3. Cryme Tyme: 13 5. Deuce & Domino: 12
|
|
