|
Post by The Varsity Club on Jan 16, 2009 17:48:31 GMT -5
forget a new title...how about introducing a new creative dept.
|
|
|
Post by Robbymac on Jan 16, 2009 17:54:34 GMT -5
forget a new title...how about introducing a new creative dept. Because after 2008 I think the current one is doing pretty damn good.
|
|
nealo
Unicron
BRING IT BACK!!
Posts: 3,166
|
Post by nealo on Jan 16, 2009 18:04:05 GMT -5
they so shudda went for Women's tag titles on SD instead of Diva's i mean theres a diva tag match ont her like every onyther week. and they keep building diva tag teams
|
|
|
Post by DASH 243✅ on Jan 16, 2009 18:31:02 GMT -5
I say bring back the FTW title!
|
|
|
Post by BorneAgain on Jan 16, 2009 18:40:03 GMT -5
Meh, they need to combine the tag titles, combine the Woman's titles , turn the ECW belt into the TV title, and have all those three tour each show.
Add the hardcore belt just for ECW, and you're set.
|
|
mattperiolat
King Koopa
Thank you, Brodie... for everything.
Posts: 11,445
|
Post by mattperiolat on Jan 16, 2009 20:51:22 GMT -5
I was just going to suggest a WWE Television Championship. With Superstars launching on WGN in April, it's a title that could be defended beyond RAW and give the lower card something to feud over while re-elevating the IC title.
Honestly, I really want the brand extension scrapped, the roster consolidated, the tag and women's titles combined and just better writing overall.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Woodrow on Jan 16, 2009 21:07:10 GMT -5
I was just going to suggest a WWE Television Championship. With Superstars launching on WGN in April, it's a title that could be defended beyond RAW and give the lower card something to feud over while re-elevating the IC title. Honestly, I really want the brand extension scrapped, the roster consolidated, the tag and women's titles combined and just better writing overall. A TV championship is a great idea. The face plate could have a TV with the WWE logo smashing out of it.
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on Jan 16, 2009 21:11:22 GMT -5
....and WWE needs a light pole deathmatch. I really don't think it does, and I doubt it's ever going to happen anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Janitor From Mars on Jan 16, 2009 21:14:46 GMT -5
Bring back the S.H.I.T title from WCW (Saskatchewan Hardcore Invitational Title) and have it defended only in hardcore matches.
|
|
MolotovMocktail
Grimlock
Home of the 5-time, 5-time, 5-time, 5-time 5-time Super Bowl Champion 49ers-and Wrestlemania 31
Posts: 13,975
|
Post by MolotovMocktail on Jan 16, 2009 21:41:31 GMT -5
f*** no, especially no new tag titles. ECW should maybe get a TV Title, though. I'm against bringing back the Hardcore, especially if it goes back to 24/7. That thing is a statistician's nightmare.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Jan 16, 2009 21:47:03 GMT -5
Dear God, no! There are already too many titles in WWE right now as is.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Jan 16, 2009 21:50:56 GMT -5
We don't need this to be like the InVasion 2001 when nearly everyone had a title. An extra one at this point is unnecessary if that is the plan they are going through with.
|
|
|
Post by Hanz Moleman on Jan 16, 2009 21:56:15 GMT -5
I really, really think we may be seeing the end of the brand extension with the economic crisis. And I know that may sound like a cop out, but it seems plausible in my mind. I really think one of the reasons we have the brand extension is just so WWE can have a stacked roster, rather than consolidate and let TNA pick up some of the roster. Im not a TNA fan or anything but I think sometimes the reason WWE has so many people that go unused is just so TNA can't gain any talent.
The last thing WWE needs, is another title.
|
|
kingoftheiwc
El Dandy
Coles whipping boy is better then you.
Posts: 7,923
|
Post by kingoftheiwc on Jan 16, 2009 22:00:53 GMT -5
I think you may be right kennedy fan because we are essentialy seeing the jobbers let go , and a bunch of cross over apperances from various superstars in the E. I would say this keep the announcers where they are and just have Grish do back stage interviews.
|
|
mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319
|
Post by mrjl on Jan 16, 2009 22:22:12 GMT -5
I don't particularly think it's likely. They are just tossing out possibilities. And honestly as often as Miz and Morrison are on Raw it doesn't matter they aren't actually Raw wrestlers.
If they do decide to bring back a CW here's s a more likely(in my opinion) list of people who might go for it.
Rey Evan Bourne Jaime Noble Cody Rhodes Dolph Ziggler Chavo DJ Gabriel Low Ki Beth Phoenix Hornswaggle
|
|
Thrillho
Dennis Stamp
0 Days since last "incident"james.anderson1989jamesandersonmusicJimBillAnderson
Posts: 3,740
|
Post by Thrillho on Jan 16, 2009 22:23:53 GMT -5
Can I just point out to anyone who didn't read the article on wwe.com, the new title idea is only a small part of the article.
Out of the other suggestions. I'm more looking forward to McMahon meeting Dolph Ziggler and joining The Legacy.
|
|
Ben Wyatt
Crow T. Robot
Are You Gonna Go My Way?
I don't get it. At all. It's kind of a small horse, I mean what am I missing? Am I crazy?
Posts: 41,511
Member is Online
|
Post by Ben Wyatt on Jan 16, 2009 22:26:24 GMT -5
NO NEW TITLES.
For the love of god.........
|
|
|
Post by gaff on Jan 16, 2009 22:30:12 GMT -5
I am of the agreement that there are far to many titles already and make an attempt at restoring the titles they have back to former glories, I mean, if its not the WWE or the WHC title then no one is really caring about it, which is ludicros
However if the E are seriously going to create another title then something different would be good, a title for RAW though simply because of the logistics of it
The Internet title - when the title is going to be defended on RAW the annoucers give you 5 possible opponents who will challenge the champion on next weeks RAW and from Tuesday-Sunday you have to go on wwe.com and debate who should be the no1 contender and why, all guys would have a 20 second promo exlusively to wwe.com to help sway your decision, then on the Sunday wwe.com would announce the winner and post some links to certain posts that helped them come to a decision
I think wwe.com would get massive amounts of hits from it, for me its a natural progression, they use the net for everything now, imagine how in touch with the business the fans would feel if they believe they are responsible for a certain match on Monday Night RAW
|
|
kingoftheiwc
El Dandy
Coles whipping boy is better then you.
Posts: 7,923
|
Post by kingoftheiwc on Jan 16, 2009 22:31:56 GMT -5
I would mark for the Internet Title.
|
|
Dr. T is an alien
Patti Mayonnaise
Knows when to hold them, knows when to fold them
I've been found out!
Posts: 31,366
|
Post by Dr. T is an alien on Jan 16, 2009 23:26:32 GMT -5
The only new title that I could deal with in a positive way is either a consolidated tag title or a TV title that is defended against the lowercard guys on all 3 (soon to be 4) shows.
|
|