|
|
Post by hil on Feb 24, 2009 12:18:48 GMT -5
I was wondering, everyone assumes that because PUNK is in MITB that there'll be no IC match at WM. Given that there is a PPV between now and WM, couldn't Punk drop the belt to say Regal at teh next PPV and Regal face someone at WM for the title? Is there really going to be no IC title match at WM? AGAIN!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Robbymac on Feb 24, 2009 12:20:46 GMT -5
This is becoming as predictable as every WM ending in 3 being in Chicago and has to stop sooner or later. Wrestlemania 3: Pontiac, MI Wrestlemania 13: Chicago, IL Wrestlemania 23: Detroit, MI  |
|
|
|
Post by heyguesswhatidid on Feb 24, 2009 12:21:25 GMT -5
There's no PPV between now and WM
|
|
Marvelously Mediocre
Fry's dog Seymour
Beggin' for a little SWAGGAH!
Haha. What a story Mark.
Posts: 21,224
|
Post by Marvelously Mediocre on Feb 24, 2009 12:22:20 GMT -5
only one WM ending in 3 has been in Chicago and there is not another ppv before Mania.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth Drakin of Monster Crap on Feb 24, 2009 12:23:17 GMT -5
I dont think it will happen. I also dont think the United States Title will be defended as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Feb 24, 2009 12:23:59 GMT -5
Punk is in MitB, thus cementing the fact the IC title is more or less irrelevant, even to the one who's holding it [kayfabe], thus it won't be defended
|
|
Hanzo
Dennis Stamp
"You want Cena to go to ECW?!"
Posts: 4,666
|
Post by Hanzo on Feb 24, 2009 12:25:03 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!No, seriously, what's your question?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Feb 24, 2009 12:27:12 GMT -5
I love how, in the same damn show, they have Ricky Steamboat proclaiming winning the IC belt was the highlight of his career, yet they have the IC champ going into MITB.
Senseless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Feb 24, 2009 12:31:02 GMT -5
I love how, in the same damn show, they have Ricky Steamboat proclaiming winning the IC belt was the highlight of his career, yet they have the IC champ going into MITB. Senseless. They really need to give a young up and coming heel a long title reign. Look at what Orton's title reign did for the IC title. Yeah, he didn't defend it at Mania, but the title meant more than it does now. |
|
Shaq-Fu
Trap-Jaw
fun fun fun
Posts: 499
|
Post by Shaq-Fu on Feb 24, 2009 12:31:31 GMT -5
It's kinda weird looking back, but really Santino's reign was something of a recent highpoint for the title. At least he seemed to care about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Feb 24, 2009 12:32:23 GMT -5
At the rate they're going RVD and Regal might be like the old Dolphins team, popping corks every Mania that passes without an IC title match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robbymac on Feb 24, 2009 12:33:39 GMT -5
At the rate they're going RVD and Regal might be like the old Dolphins team, popping corks every Mania that passes without an IC title match. With those two it might not be champagne, but some other foreign substance. |
|
|
|
Post by hil on Feb 24, 2009 12:33:50 GMT -5
This is becoming as predictable as every WM ending in 3 being in Chicago and has to stop sooner or later. Wrestlemania 3: Pontiac, MI Wrestlemania 13: Chicago, IL Wrestlemania 23: Detroit, MI Ah - my apologies, could've sworn that was the case. Being English - tis all the US |
|
PKO
King Koopa
Posts: 12,613
|
Post by PKO on Feb 24, 2009 12:34:26 GMT -5
I thought they'd done quite a good job the past few months in promoting how important the Intercontinental Championship was with the tournment and the Punk/Regal feud. I'm really in two minds about the IC champion being in the Money in the Bank match. I mean, surely the champion should be happy that he's holding the IC championship? But then again why wouldn't he want an opportunity at the TOP belt?
They could probably solve all my doubts with a simple promo from CM Punk saying how important the IC title is to him but how he wants the main gold.
|
|
|
|
Post by chunkylover53 on Feb 24, 2009 12:54:26 GMT -5
What I want to know is, what was the point on Punk winning the IC belt if he was already World Heavyweight Champion?
|
|
|
|
Post by 'Foretold' Joker on Feb 24, 2009 13:13:42 GMT -5
He could of course lose it before WM on Raw and thus a small match for it is created.
I'd like to see one of the new young heels given a chance with it perhaps Cody or Ted they could defend it against say Kofi.
|
|
Big L
Grimlock
Posts: 13,883
|
Post by Big L on Feb 24, 2009 14:19:27 GMT -5
What I want to know is, what was the point on Punk winning the IC belt if he was already World Heavyweight Champion? i guess so they can say that he's held all three major titles on raw |
|
|
|
Post by johnnyk9 on Feb 24, 2009 14:20:15 GMT -5
All WWE titles should be defended at Mania but it won't happen
|
|
|
|
Post by Gregor-2012 on Feb 24, 2009 14:22:53 GMT -5
I'd like to see one but i dont think the Punk/Regal feud is good enough for Mania and Punk is fairly good in MITB matches.
Plus there is no PPV between now and Mania, there never has been! What show were you thinking of?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay-Jay on Feb 24, 2009 14:23:25 GMT -5
I was hoping CM Punk vs Kane for the IC title would happen at Wrestlemania with Kelly Kelly turning on Punk to give Kane the win. Punk won't win MITB again anyways. If the US title match happens, it will be MVP (c) vs Mr. Kennedy. If not, both will be in MITB
|
|
