|
|
Post by Snitsky on Mar 31, 2009 9:03:44 GMT -5
How come after all these years undertaker and kane are still allowed to be kayfabe brothers?
what happened to
billy and bart
the major brothers
the bashams
the dupps
the shamrocks
edge and christian
why does WWE expect us to forget these unions ever happened?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Tank on Mar 31, 2009 9:05:36 GMT -5
Well, most of the ones you listed are ones that they didn't really expect us to forget the union, because most of us and the casual fan forgot about them altogether.
As for E&C, that one's a mystery. Although, once I found out that they were born literally a month apart, I always had a problem believing they were "brothers".
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Mar 31, 2009 9:24:20 GMT -5
I think the reason they started trying to crush the whole Edge & Christian brother gimmick is because they wanted to push Edge and distance him from his goofy past, and Christian was still a relatively goofy character back in 2004. I think when an angle eventually calls for it, they'll be "brothers" again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Snitsky on Mar 31, 2009 10:02:00 GMT -5
taker and kane havt really needed each other in any recent storylines but i like that WWE keeps that intact
|
|
|
|
Post by George Harrison on Mar 31, 2009 10:05:09 GMT -5
because undertaker and kane are actually real brothers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Snitsky on Mar 31, 2009 10:15:27 GMT -5
because undertaker and kane are actually real brothers. what ever do you mean?  like matt and jeff??? NO |
|
