|
|
Post by whitecrxsses on Oct 16, 2009 11:56:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by SsnakeBite, the No1 Frenchman on Oct 16, 2009 12:00:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Oct 16, 2009 12:03:06 GMT -5
Bit of a paradox, isn't it? If they are irrellevant and unknown, thus qualifying them for mention on the wiki, would that not make them relevant and notworthy, thereby disqualifying them? Then, once they are disqualified, they become illigible again.
|
|
|
|
Post by whitecrxsses on Oct 16, 2009 13:27:37 GMT -5
Bit of a paradox, isn't it? If they are irrellevant and unknown, thus qualifying them for mention on the wiki, would that not make them relevant and notworthy, thereby disqualifying them? Then, once they are disqualified, they become illigible again. No, because since this site is in no way an official and reliable source of information (  ), it doesn't count for notability. |
|
|
|
Post by Bullhead on Oct 16, 2009 15:27:23 GMT -5
Hey! Finally something I'm qualified for!
|
|
|
|
Post by farmeriggy on Oct 16, 2009 15:40:17 GMT -5
I have a page on the real one. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by whitecrxsses on Oct 17, 2009 6:11:11 GMT -5
BAMP
Anyone?
|
|
), it doesn't count for notability.