MasonK565
El Dandy
Biggest Damian Wayne fan on FAN.
Posts: 8,577
|
Post by MasonK565 on Jun 3, 2009 19:36:02 GMT -5
I really would like TNA to get a new show here in America that would actually showcase todays talent and events. TNA is hiring too much talent to fit on that 2 hour time card. We are already seeing wrestlers take a sit by not seeing Morgan, Kiroyoshi (or watever it is), Holldiday, Rhino, Bashir, NO Limit, and others not getting a chance to shine. Knockouts are also not appearing as well. I like the idea of Epics and it will connect to fans and create new ones in Europe, but I think TNA should get a new show. But i think the shows shouldn't be brand exclusive until after a year the new show was made. X Division and the KO titles could go to different shows and the tag titles could be for all of TNA. I think then TNA could make a hardcore title to make show exclusive, and Legends title going to another. Wrestlers could be exclusive also so more superstars get a chance. The hardcore title would be good because so many wrestlers could fit in to that division such as Stevie, Douglas, Raven, Abyss, Morgan, Team 3D, Rhino, and others could easily join as well. This would also open a hole for the knockouts too, so they can get in more matches. Are these decent ideas or should I just shut up and go away.
|
|
Jimmy
Grimlock
Posts: 13,317
|
Post by Jimmy on Jun 3, 2009 19:37:18 GMT -5
I think they should consider a one hour live show on Sunday's, similar to Sunday Night Heat was for the WWF in 1998.
|
|
|
Post by rawthentic on Jun 3, 2009 19:57:16 GMT -5
Nope. One show is fine.
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Jun 3, 2009 20:00:27 GMT -5
Where's TNA needs to fix the show they already have?
|
|
|
Post by Cap'n Crud on Jun 3, 2009 20:25:41 GMT -5
Where's TNA needs to fix the show they already have? This The only thing TNA would do with a second show is show more Mick Foley, Sting, and the rest of the over the hill players taking up air time.
|
|
|
Post by destrucity on Jun 3, 2009 21:38:55 GMT -5
I like that there are 7 choices for yes and only one no.
|
|
metylerca
King Koopa
Loves Him Some Backstreet Boys.
Don't be alarmed.
Posts: 12,479
|
Post by metylerca on Jun 3, 2009 21:48:47 GMT -5
I like that there are 7 choices for yes and only one no.
|
|
ICBM
King Koopa
Didn't know we did status updates here now
Posts: 12,288
|
Post by ICBM on Jun 3, 2009 22:35:10 GMT -5
First off there is nothing wrong with Impact, you have your opinions but almost 2 million other viewers might feel differently
Second, no second show needed, WWE is over saturating the market as it is TNA has no need to compete this way
|
|
Professor Chaos
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bringer of Destruction and Maker of Doom
Posts: 16,332
|
Post by Professor Chaos on Jun 4, 2009 3:46:15 GMT -5
I gotta say no just because WWE's over saturated me so much feeling I have to watch their 6 hours per week (9 on PPV weeks) in order to keep up. TNA's great I get my 2 hour fix 1 night a week and that's it (cept for PPV weeks). I wish WWE never brought back SuperStars. Feel like I gotta watch the thing but already had 2 hours or wrestling to watch on Thursday's with TNA so now it's overkill. During the week I actually appreciate wednesday's cause there's no wrestling that I feel obligated to watch.
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Jun 4, 2009 7:19:35 GMT -5
First off there is nothing wrong with Impact, you have your opinions but almost 2 million other viewers might feel differently Second, no second show needed, WWE is over saturating the market as it is TNA has no need to compete this way Theres a lot wrong with Impact, I watch the show but it needs work. The fact that it's a two hour show and it just has a random feel to it, you don't know if it's the middle of the show, start of the show or the freaking mainevent. Love it or hate it but WWE has used the same pacing in their shows for years, you always know what part of the show their on. Which does make it better for the viewer. (even if the show does seem like a rerun sometimes)
|
|
|
Post by sphere on Jun 4, 2009 13:47:34 GMT -5
I think TNA needs a second show. TNA has a huge roster of talent, and they have a lot of people under contract who we dont know about and are stalling their debut. Case in point: Sarah Stock was to debut on Impact and get the top babyface push until TNA called in Victoria. If TNA had a second show they could have Sarah Stock debut on the second show as the top babyface. Yea, ICBM, WWE has too much programming during the week, but look how many of their talent is being exposed on TV cause of that. Its win-win for the viewers that want to see new WWE superstars and are sick of watching the one staple show with the same people dominating the show every week.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Jammer on Jun 4, 2009 15:03:24 GMT -5
I like the idea of an hour show on Sunday nights, from 7-8. Then, as someone above stated, they could do the shows live on PPV nights. I still remember how awesome those live, pre-PPV WCW Main Events and WWE Sunday Night Heats were.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Jun 4, 2009 16:12:56 GMT -5
No. There's enough televised wrestling as it is.
|
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on Jun 4, 2009 16:55:08 GMT -5
No, it does not.
|
|
domrep
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by domrep on Jun 4, 2009 17:58:34 GMT -5
A web show would be a good idea b/c it pushes their "expansion" initiative that WWE seems to not grasp.
Something that can be posted on Twitter, YouTube, etc. Maybe a 45 minute webshow per week, that combines Spin Cycle, TNA Today and an exclusive match or matches.
|
|
|
Post by Jay Carroll on Jun 4, 2009 22:12:10 GMT -5
I like the idea of an hour show on Sunday nights, from 7-8. Then, as someone above stated, they could do the shows live on PPV nights. I still remember how awesome those live, pre-PPV WCW Main Events and WWE Sunday Night Heats were. I agree with this. Or, put it on Saturdays like how TBS had WCW Saturday Night
|
|
|
Post by HisRoyalGreeness on Jun 6, 2009 18:20:58 GMT -5
I was just thinking about this. TNA should have a show dedicated to the Knockouts. I honestly never thought I'd be down for a show featuring nothing but female wrestlers but the women in TNA have changed my thinking entirely. They've got a deep enough roster of ladies that can wrestle and play a role. A lot of people are going to disagree with this and I understand but here goes...You could put a show involving nothing but Knockouts head to head with Raw and it would hold its own or possibly even beat Raw in the ratings after people caught on to it. Why would I possibly say something so ludicrous? Simple. The Knockouts are TNA's bread and butter based on the ratings breakdowns I've seen. They would capture the male audience and maybe girls would catch on and get behind it. Add that to the fact that Raw is as stale as its ever been and you've got a bit of a battle. Did you know that Monday Night Raw was watched by less viewers than that of TNA (insert show name here). It could happen.
|
|
|
Post by GaTechGrad on Jun 6, 2009 19:14:20 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind a Saturday morning show to take the place of the Impact repeat.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Jammer on Jun 6, 2009 20:10:33 GMT -5
No. There's enough televised wrestling as it is. Yes, but of the seven hours of weekly wrestling, five are from the WWE. So tell me, why should TNA limit their exposure because of the WWE's overexposure? If the WWE feels the need for five hours weekly, what's wrong with TNA aiming for three?
|
|
Toates Madhackrviper
King Koopa
Is owed an Admin life-debt.
This avatar is so far out of date I might as well stick with it forever now.
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by Toates Madhackrviper on Jun 6, 2009 20:22:14 GMT -5
I was just thinking about this. TNA should have a show dedicated to the Knockouts. I honestly never thought I'd be down for a show featuring nothing but female wrestlers but the women in TNA have changed my thinking entirely. They've got a deep enough roster of ladies that can wrestle and play a role. A lot of people are going to disagree with this and I understand but here goes...You could put a show involving nothing but Knockouts head to head with Raw and it would hold its own or possibly even beat Raw in the ratings after people caught on to it. Why would I possibly say something so ludicrous? Simple. The Knockouts are TNA's bread and butter based on the ratings breakdowns I've seen. They would capture the male audience and maybe girls would catch on and get behind it. Add that to the fact that Raw is as stale as its ever been and you've got a bit of a battle. Did you know that Monday Night Raw was watched by less viewers than that of TNA (insert show name here). It could happen. And it would increase the likelyhood of Being hired I agree either a Knockout show or a Heat type program would do wonders for TNA right now.
|
|