|
Post by barryhorowitz4ever on Oct 18, 2005 21:26:46 GMT -5
i just saw a tiny clip of the ultimate warrior dvd, and all i can say, conserning hulk hogan complaining about someone acting unproffesionally, is...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA,bruther!
|
|
El Pollo Guerrera
Grimlock
His name has chicken in it, and he is good at makin' .gifs, so that's cool.
Status: Runner
Posts: 14,768
|
Post by El Pollo Guerrera on Oct 18, 2005 23:50:53 GMT -5
I STILL love the fact that Hogan admitted that he couldn't get it out of his trunks fast enough and it went off in his face.
The fireball incident from Halloween Havoc '98, I mean...
|
|
|
Post by darthpipes on Oct 19, 2005 22:09:24 GMT -5
That was pretty funny.
Hogan annoyed me a couple of time during this. He said Warrior did the "unforgiveable thing" by pointing out during his debut in WCW that he defeated Hogan the only time they met. Friggin Hogan and his ego. The fact that Warrior had beaten him cleanly was supposed to be the main selling point of the feud. Also, his claim that everyone was watching him leave Wrestlemania VI instead of watching the Warrior celebrate. I remember watching that match with my brother and some friends and we all were saying that they needed to get the camera the hell away from Hogan.
|
|
|
Post by jack22 on Oct 19, 2005 22:25:22 GMT -5
Well think of Hogan what you want but in 1990 even when Warrior had the strap there was still a hell of a lot more interest in what Hogan was doing.
If you think back to the Summer of 1990 the main program that summer was not Warrior's WWF title feud with Ravishing Rick Rude but rather Hogan's with our friend Mr Quake Earthtenta......Mr Tenta Earthquake I mean - but it's true that match carried more interest than anything Warrior was doing at the time.
As for the "ultimate no-no" Warrior commited I'm not too sure what Hogan meant as he never refered specifically to a moment in the promo. Perhaps he meant the fact that it went on for so long or the fact that Warrior was basically putting down the legend of Hogan when maybe the idea at the time was to try and re-create 1990 with two unbeatable, ultra, mega stars going off against each other.
|
|
ohnomellon
Trap-Jaw
Deal with it America! Deal with it!
Posts: 336
|
Post by ohnomellon on Oct 20, 2005 1:01:13 GMT -5
Here I thought the ultimate no-no was mentioning what happened in another promotion.
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Oct 20, 2005 2:07:08 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure Hogan meant that Warrior mentioning that he had already beaten Hogan would basically take away any heat for the feud. Any new fans would basically be saying "Oh, he's beaten Hogan already? Big deal"
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Oct 20, 2005 3:16:05 GMT -5
the most interesting part is by that points its like the fourth biggest no-no in the buisness mentioned on the DVD.
|
|
|
Post by omgimobsessed on Oct 20, 2005 3:42:25 GMT -5
I liked how Hulk and Bischoff were like "Nooooo! We didn't bring in Warrior so Hogan could avenge his loss at WM VI!". That and how Bisch admitted the match was one of the all time greatest stinkers.
|
|
|
Post by Pgarodactyl on Oct 20, 2005 8:21:04 GMT -5
Hogan still had the best line during that segment...
"And I think he went on for about another 10 minutes.."
|
|
|
Post by darthpipes on Oct 25, 2005 12:53:57 GMT -5
Hogan didn't like the fact that Warrior mentioned he had beaten him already. He's an idiot...that was what the selling point of the feud was supposed to be.
I think Bischoff brought the Warrior in because of his name appeal but Hogan's reason was to avenge his loss. He never got over it. Flair talks about it in his book, that was the reason behind The Renegade. I heard he even tried to bring Yokozuna into WCW to avenge that loss.
|
|
|
Post by jack22 on Oct 25, 2005 12:56:07 GMT -5
No the selling point wouldn't have been that Warrior already beat Hogan easily.
A) He didn't.(not EASILY)
B) That would have put Hogan in the face position as it would have been on him to make the comeback and defeat Warrior. Warrior was clearly being pushed as the face in that feud.
|
|