Feuds where the heel won.

[I Like Your Poetry]

As much as WWE likes to showcase the classic "good triumping over evil"...this isn't always the case.


Take the tail-end of the disasterous Hornswoggle/Bastard Child angle. When it became a JBL vs. Finlay feud, JBL beat Finlay at Wrestlemania in his own match type AND made Hornswoggle cry.

[Deleted]

everyone JBL faced after he won the title until he lost it to Cena

[Curt Hawkins Fan]

Triple H from Sept. 2nd 2002-Royal Rumble 2005.

[Matt Rogers]

I'd say Jericho pretty much destroyed Michaels last year.

[clifford]

Triple H in his feud with Jericho mid 2000.

[Kroot bringing Justice]

Triple HHH v Booker

[Nic Nemeth]

Didn't anyone Dreamer faced beat him in the feud?

[Bubble Lead]

The majority of Triple Hs heel feuds.

Hell, he even went over Austin, who people try and paint as a guy who steamrolled over everyone and never lost.

Its pretty amusing how HHH is exempt from both the "face must win at WM" and "face must go over the especially nefarious, dastardly heel" rules.

I remember after WM 25 a lot of HHH defenders saying he had to win at WM 25 and beat Orton as badly as he did because a face has to win at WM and a face has to win in such a personal feud. How dare anyone complain or question that! Yet this doesn't apply to the countless times heel dickhead HHH beat the snot out of faces.

*shrug*

[Soultastic]

Edge won his last match against Cena

[Hakumental]

Chavo made Rey "quit for good" during their feud - although I've heard people argue that Rey was the real villain in that saga.

[Munkie91087]

Triple H went over Cactus Jack in 2000...I'm noticing a pattern here.

[Topher is Human]

Nov 25, 2009 21:21:06 GMT -5 Bubble Lead said:

The majority of Triple Hs heel feuds.

Hell, he even went over Austin, who people try and paint as a guy who steamrolled over everyone and never lost.

Its pretty amusing how HHH is exempt from both the "face must win at WM" and "face must go over the especially nefarious, dastardly heel" rules.

I remember after WM 25 a lot of HHH defenders saying he had to win at WM 25 and beat Orton as badly as he did because a face has to win at WM and a face has to win in such a personal feud. How dare anyone complain or question that! Yet this doesn't apply to the countless times heel dickhead HHH beat the snot out of faces.

*shrug*

Uhh, but he has lost most of the recent WMs... Like all of them from 20-24.

[mysterydriver]

Big Daddy V destroyed The Boogeyman in their ECW Feud.

[Ben Wyatt]

Edge clearly won the fued with Matt Hardy.

Also, Punk over Jeff Hardy

[The Ichi]

I would say that Austin won the feud against Angle in 2001, even though team WWF won over team Invasion...so it's hard to tell really.

[DrizzlinShytes]

Ric Flair over Luger and Sting.

[Bubble Lead]

Nov 25, 2009 22:02:53 GMT -5 Topher is Human said:

Nov 25, 2009 21:21:06 GMT -5 Bubble Lead said:

The majority of Triple Hs heel feuds.

Hell, he even went over Austin, who people try and paint as a guy who steamrolled over everyone and never lost.

Its pretty amusing how HHH is exempt from both the "face must win at WM" and "face must go over the especially nefarious, dastardly heel" rules.

I remember after WM 25 a lot of HHH defenders saying he had to win at WM 25 and beat Orton as badly as he did because a face has to win at WM and a face has to win in such a personal feud. How dare anyone complain or question that! Yet this doesn't apply to the countless times heel dickhead HHH beat the snot out of faces.

*shrug*

Uhh, but he has lost most of the recent WMs... Like all of them from 20-24.

Yeah I know. I was talking about him winning WM 2000.

Not saying he never loses or anything. Just saying that he won the majority of his heel feuds which is a rarity in WWE land.

[Hawk Hart]

Nov 25, 2009 22:02:53 GMT -5 Topher is Human said:

Nov 25, 2009 21:21:06 GMT -5 Bubble Lead said:

The majority of Triple Hs heel feuds.

Hell, he even went over Austin, who people try and paint as a guy who steamrolled over everyone and never lost.

Its pretty amusing how HHH is exempt from both the "face must win at WM" and "face must go over the especially nefarious, dastardly heel" rules.

I remember after WM 25 a lot of HHH defenders saying he had to win at WM 25 and beat Orton as badly as he did because a face has to win at WM and a face has to win in such a personal feud. How dare anyone complain or question that! Yet this doesn't apply to the countless times heel dickhead HHH beat the snot out of faces.

*shrug*

Uhh, but he has lost most of the recent WMs... Like all of them from 20-24.

For that argument to be valid, you really have to look at how he lost.

20: Heel: He lost to Benoit in the triple threat cleanly.
21: Heel: He put over his buddy Batista cleanly.
22: Face: Put Cena over cleanly.
24: Face: Didn't take the fall in a triple threat with Orton and Cena.

Now you have to look at every Mania he was in the main event before that.

2000: Heel: Beat the Rock, Big Show, and Foley in a 4 way for the WWF title.
17: Heel: Lost to Taker in a rather dirty way.
X8: Face: Pinned Jericho clean in a match for the Undisputed title.
XIX: Heel: Pinned Booker T clean when Booker was, arguable, the hottest he ever was in WWE.


In terms of sheer numbers, Triple H does seem to be exempt from the face must win rule.

[MrBRulzOK]

Well Sheamus won not only his feud with Goldust, but also the one with Shelton Benjamin.

Also, Jack Swagger seemed to win out in his first feud with Tommy Dreamer.

[Deleted]

- The Rock over Mankind
- Chris Jericho over HBK
- HHH over Austin (he won the last match these two had one on one)
- Edge over Matt Hardy
- CM Punk over Jeff Hardy